Abstract
This paper reports on how the geometry component of the National Curricula for mathematics in Japan and in one selected country of the UK, specifically England, is interpreted in school mathematics textbooks from major publishers sampled from each country. The findings we report identify features of geometry, and approaches to geometry teaching and learning, that are found in a sample of textbooks aimed at students in Grade 8 (aged 13–14). Our analysis raises two issues which are widely recognised as very important in mathematics education: the teaching of mathematical reasoning and proof, and the teaching of problem-solving. In terms of the teaching of mathematical reasoning and proof, our evidence indicates that this is dispersed in the textbook in England while it is concentrated in geometry in the textbook in Japan. In terms of the teaching of mathematical problem-solving and modeling, our analysis shows that it is more concentrated in the textbook from England, and rather more dispersed in the textbook from Japan. These findings indicate how important it is to consider ways in which these issues can be carefully designed in the geometry sections of future textbooks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atiyah, M. (2001). Mathematics in the 20th century. American Mathematical Monthly, 108(7), 654–666.
Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1995). Geometry and proof. Mathematics Teacher, 88(1), 48–54.
Department for Education. (2013). The National Curriculum in England: Framework document for consultation. London: DFE.
Department for Education and Employment. (1999). Mathematics: The National Curriculum for England. London: DfEE.
Department for Education and Employment. (2001). Key Stage 3 National Strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: DfEE.
Foxman, D. (1999). Mathematics textbooks across the world: Some evidence from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Slough: NFER.
Fujii, T., & Matano, H. (Eds.). (2012). Mathematics International Grade 8. Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki.
Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2013). Reasoning-and-proving in geometry in school mathematics textbooks in Japan. International Journal of Educational Research (accepted).
Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2011). From text to ‘Lived’ resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. New York: Springer.
Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2007). From intended curriculum to written curriculum: Examining the ‘voice’ of a mathematics textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.
Howson, G. (1991). National Curricula in mathematics. Leicester: The Mathematical Association.
Howson, G. (1995). Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of Grade 8 texts (TIMSS monograph 3). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Hoyles, C., Foxman, D., & Küchemann, D. (2002). A comparative study of geometry curricula. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
Kamens, D. H., & Benavot, A. (1991). Elite knowledge for the masses: The origins and spread of mathematics and science education in national curricular. American Journal of Education, 99(2), 137–180.
Koedinger, K. R. (1998). Conjecturing and argumentation in high-school geometry students. In R. Lehrer & D. Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 319–347). Mahwah: LEA.
Mariotti, M., & Balacheff, N. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on didactical and epistemological perspectives on mathematical proof. ZDM International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(3), 341–344.
MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science & Technology). (2008). Course of Study Section 3 Mathematics 9 (in Japanese; published in English in 2010). English version retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/04/11/1298356_4.pdf.
Millet, A., & Johnson, D. C. (1996). Solving teachers’ problems? The role of the commercial mathematics scheme. In D. C. Johnson & A. Millet (Eds.), Implementing the Mathematics National Curriculum: Policy, politics and practice (pp. 54–70). London: Paul Chapman.
Miyakawa, T. (2012). Proof in geometry: A comparative analysis of French and Japanese textbooks. In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 225–232). Taipei: PME.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Minnich, C.A., Stanco, G.M., Arora, A., Centurino, V.A.S., & Castle, C.E. (Eds.). (2012). TIMSS 2011 encyclopedia: Education policy and curriculum in mathematics and science (Vols. 1 and 2). Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Pelgrum, W. J., Eggen, T., & Plomp, T. (1986). Second International Mathematics Study: The implemented and attained mathematics curriculum: A comparison of eighteen countries. Washington, DC: Center for Education Statistics.
Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 33(5), 158–175.
Peterson, B. E. (2008). A look at Japanese junior high school mathematics textbooks. In Z. Usiskin & E. Willmore (Eds.), Mathematics Curriculum in Pacific Rim Countries: China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore (pp. 209–231). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Remillard, J., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Lloyd, G. (Eds.). (2008). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction. New York: Routledge.
Reys, B. J., Reys, R. E., & Chávez, O. (2004). Why mathematics textbooks matter. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 61–66.
Rezat, S. (2006). The structure of German mathematics textbooks. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 38(6), 482–487.
Robitaille, D. (1980). Intention, implementation, realization: The impact of curriculum reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 72(4), 299–306.
Robitaille, D.F., McKnight C., Schmidt, W.H., Britton, E., Raizen, S., & Nicol, C. (1993). Curriculum frameworks for mathematics and science, TIMSS monograph no. 1. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Ruddock, G. (1998). Mathematics in the School Curriculum: An international perspective. London: NFER.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (Eds.). (1997). Many visions, many aims: A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Shimizu, S., & Watanabe, T. (2010). Principles and processes for publishing textbooks and alignment with standards: A case in Japan. Paper presented at the APEC conference on replicating exemplary practices in mathematics education, Thailand, 7–12 March 2010.
Sinclair, N. (2008). The history of the geometry curriculum in the United States. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Straker, A., Fisher, T., Hyde, R., Jennings, S., & Longstaffe, J. (2008). Exploring mathematics 5 class book. Harlow: Person.
The Chicago School Mathematics Project Staff. (1971). The CSMP development in geometry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(3&4), 281–285.
Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253–295.
Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (Eds.). (1989). The IEA Study of Mathematics I: Analysis of mathematics curricula. Oxford: Pergamon.
Unesco (1986). The place of science and technology in school curricula: A global survey. Paris: Unesco.
Usiskin, Z. (1987). Resolving the continuing dilemmas in school geometry. In M. M. Lindquist & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), Learning and teaching geometry, K-12 (pp. 17–31). Reston: NCTM.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Villani, V., et al. (1994). Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21st century (discussion document for an ICMI Study). L’Enseignement Mathematique, 40(3–4), 345–357.
Vincent, J., & Stacey, K. (2008). Do mathematics textbooks cultivate shallow teaching? Applying the TIMSS Video Study criteria to Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(1), 82–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 13.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, K., Fujita, T. Interpretations of National Curricula: the case of geometry in textbooks from England and Japan. ZDM Mathematics Education 45, 671–683 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0515-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0515-5