Abstract
The didactic triangle links mathematics, teachers and students in a consideration of teaching–learning interactions in mathematics classrooms. This paper focuses on teachers and teaching in the development of fruitful learning experiences for students with mathematics. It recognises primarily that teachers are humans with personal characteristics, subject to a range of influences through the communities of which they are a part, and considers aspects of teachers’ personhood, identity and agency in designing teaching for the benefit of their students. Teaching is seen as a developmental process in which inquiry plays a central role, both in doing mathematics in the classroom and in exploring teaching practice. The teacher-as-inquirer in collaboration with outsider researchers leads to growth of knowledge in teaching through development of identity and agency for both groups. The inclusion of the outsider researcher brings an additional node into the didactic triangle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Teachers’ names here are pseudonyms.
The learning communities in mathematics (LCM) project in Norway in which a team of around 12 didacticians collaborated with up to 30 teachers from 8 schools to promote inquiry in classrooms (see, e.g., Jaworski, 2008).
References
Apter, M. (1989). Negativism and the sense of identity. In G. Breakwell (Ed.), Threatened identities. London: Wiley.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1998). Joint activity in mathematics classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Boaler, J., & Wiliam, D. (2001). ‘We’ve still got to learn!’ Students’ perspectives on ability grouping and mathematics achievement. In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 77–92). London: Taylor and Francis.
Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Falmer Press.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.
Freudenthal, H. (1978). Weeding and sowing. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
Gates, P. (1989). Developing consciousness and pedagogical knowledge through mutual observation. In P. Woods (Ed.), Working for teacher development (pp. 11–38). London: Taylor and Francis.
Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytical lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–126.
Harré, R. (1998). The singular self. London: Sage Publications.
Heron, J. (1992). Feeling and personhood: Psychology in another key. London: Sage Publications.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Jaworski, B. (1990). Video as a tool for teachers’ professional development. British Journal of In-service Education, 16(1), 60–65.
Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.
Jaworski, B (1996). A study of teacher enquiry into the processes of mathematics teaching. In Proceedings of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
Jaworski, B. (1998). Mathematics teacher research: Process practice and the development of teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3–31.
Jaworski, B. (2004). Grappling with complexity: Co-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. X, pp. 17–32). Bergen: Bergen University College.
Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211.
Jaworski, B. (2008). Development of the mathematics teacher educator and its relation to teaching development. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education, mathematics teacher educator as a developing professional (Vol. 4, pp. 335–361). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Jaworski, B. (2011). Teaching mathematics to address fundamental human rights. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute, University of Utrecht.
Jaworski, B., & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the macro-micro divide: Using an activity theory model to capture complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 219–236.
Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 133–150.
Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Developing mathematical thinking. London: Addison Wesley.
McIntyre, D. (1993). Theory, theorizing and reflection in initial teacher education. In J. Calderhead & P. Gates (Eds.), Conceptualising reflection in teacher development (pp. 39–52). London: Falmer.
Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is mathematics T.I.R.E.D? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345–368.
Nolder, R. (1992). Bringing teachers to the centre of the stage. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London, Kings College.
Open University. (1988). ME234: Using mathematical thinking, video anthology. Milton Keynes: Open University.
Potari, D., & Jaworski, B. (2002). Tackling complexity in mathematics teacher development: Using the teaching triad as a tool for reflection and enquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(4), 351–380.
Pring, R. (2004). Philosophy of education. London: Continuum.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.
Skott, J. (2001). The emerging practices of a novice teacher: The roles of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 3–28.
Skovsmose, O., & Säljö, R. (2008). Learning mathematics through inquiry. NOMAD, 13, 31–51.
Stenhouse, L. (1984). Evaluating curriculum evaluation. In C. Adelman (Ed.), The politics and ethics of education. London: Croom Helm.
Sutherland, R. (2007). Teaching for learning mathematics. London: Open University Press.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Toward a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wells, G. (Ed.). (2001). Action, talk and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. NY: Teachers College Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, H., & Goldenburg, M. P. (1998). Some conceptions are difficult to change: One middle school mathematics teacher’s struggle. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(3), 269–293.
Zack, V., Mousley, J., & Breen, C. (1997). Developing practice: Teachers’ inquiry and educational change. Victoria: Deakin University.
Zaslavsky, O., & Leikin, R. (2004). Professional development of mathematics teacher educators: Growth through practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1, 5–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaworski, B. Mathematics teaching development as a human practice: identifying and drawing the threads. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 613–625 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0437-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0437-7