Skip to main content
Log in

New challenges in the 2011 revised middle school curriculum of South Korea: mathematical process and mathematical attitude

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ‘future-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum focused on creativity and personality’ was revised in August of 2011 with the aim of nurturing students’ mathematical creativity and sound personalities. The curriculum emphasizes: contextual learning from which students can grasp mathematical concepts and make connections with their everyday lives; manipulation activities through which students may attain an intuitive idea of what they are learning and enhance their creativity; and reasoning to justify mathematical results based on their knowledge and experience. Since students will not be able to engage in the intended mathematical process with the study-load imposed by the current curriculum, the newly revised curriculum modifies or deletes some parts of the contents that have been traditionally taught mechanically. This paper provides a detailed overview of the main points of the revised curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1995). Geometry and proof. Mathematics Teacher, 88, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. H. & Lin, F. L. (2009). Developing learning strategies for enhancing below average students’ ability in constructing multi-steps geometry proof. Proceedings of ICMI Study, 19(I) 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epp, S. (2003). The role of logic in teaching proof. The American Mathematical Monthly, 110, 886–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2005). Seminar for investigating revision direction for the national mathematics curriculum (in Korean). Research Material ORM 2005-26. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

  • Lew, H. C. (1999). New goals and directions for mathematics education in Korea. In C. Hoyles, C. Morgan, & G. Woodhouse (Eds.), Rethinking the mathematics curriculum (pp. 218–227). London: Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, H. C. (2008). Some characteristics of the Korean national curriculum and its revision process. In Z. Usiskin & E. Willmore (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in Pacific Rim countries—China. Information Age Publishing: Japan, Korea, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (1997). The 7th elementary school curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.

  • Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). Mathematics curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology.

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Center, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrows’ world: First results from PISA 2003. France: Organization for Economy and Cooperation and Development.

  • OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. France: Organization for Economy and Cooperation and Development.

  • Park, H. S. (1991). Historical development of mathematics education in Korea. In J. H. Woo (Ed.), Proceedings of the Korea/US seminar on comparative analysis of mathematics education in Korea and the United States (pp. 1–25). Seoul: Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. Y. (2003). Research on teaching method of the value of approximation: Focusing on comparison of the value of approximation in South and North Korean textbooks (in Korean). Unpublished Thesis, Jun-Nam University.

  • Park, M. J. (2010). An investigation on the value of approximation (in Korean), Unpublished Thesis, Young-Nam University, South Korea.

  • Senk, S. L. (1985). How well do students write geometry proofs? Mathematics Teacher, 78, 448–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, J. H. (1992). A Korean perspective on mathematics education. Journal of the Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2(1), 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J. S. & Cho, W. Y. (2003). Concept image of function and ability to define function (in Korean). Proceedings of Mathematics Education Researches, 15, 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H. J., Kim, Y. J., Lee, K. W., & Jeon, J. C. (2007). A study on developing a key competence in the primary/secondary school curriculum for the future of Koreans (in Korean). Research Report RRC 2007–1. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hee-chan Lew.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Key feature of primary school curriculum

One of the most significant changes in the 2011 revised curriculum is the establishment of grade bands, which were put in place in order to reduce rigidity and enhance flexibility in organizing and managing school curricula by fostering inter-grade connectedness and integration. Accordingly, primary school mathematics is divided into three grade bands consisting of 1–2, 3–4, and 5–6. Problem-solving, which was a key content in ‘regularity and problem-solving’ which was one of the five areas presented in the 2007 curriculum, is classified as process knowledge rather than content knowledge apart from the remaining four areas: ‘number and operations’, ‘geometry’, ‘measurement’ and ‘probability and statistics’. It is covered through activities utilizing content knowledge of the four areas. A new domain, namely ‘relations’, which deals with ratio, equations and finding regularities, is added.

1.2 Key feature of high school curriculum

The ‘math’ subject that is required for 9th grade students in the current mathematics curriculum is included in the National Common Basic Curriculum and has been designated as an 8-unit (4 h/week for two semesters) required course. At the 11th and 12th grade level students are to select and take the courses that suit their needs depending on their future career goals, interests and aptitudes from among six 6-unit elective courses of ‘Calculus and basic statistics’ (6 units), ‘Math I’ (6 units), ‘Math II’ (6 units), ‘Integrals and statistics’ (6 units), ‘Geometry and vectors’ (6 units), and ‘Practical use of mathematics’ (6 units). However, in the 2011 reformed curriculum, the math subject will consist of six 5-unit elective courses (‘math I’, ‘math II’, ‘calculus I’, ‘calculus II’, ‘geometry and vectors’, ‘probability and statistics’), and the volume of the content will also be reduced by 20 %. In addition, the curriculum will consider various levels of students by providing basic courses and intensive courses.

Integrating separate chapters will be conducive to largely reducing the amount of unnecessarily complicated calculation and will provide students with more opportunities to pose fundamental questions and ponder upon why each theme is introduced. Through such process students are expected to personally experience the value of mathematics and recognize why mathematics is required and useful in understanding and describing natural and social phenomena.

‘Basic math’ is a basic course designed for students who are not equipped with a sound foundation of middle school math. Students can select this course in order to reach a systematic understanding of fundamental mathematical concepts, principles and rules needed for taking the general math courses. ‘math I’ and ‘math II’ include basic contents needed for covering calculus. ‘calculus I’ and ‘calculus II’ consist of basic calculus, calculus of polynomial functions and calculus of transcendental functions. Additionally, as the knowledge of probability and statistics is greatly required in modern society, ‘probability and statistics’ is provided as one independent subject, and ‘geometry and vectors’ is also placed as an independent subject.

Lastly, ‘Intensive math I’ is designed for students to systematically understand higher levels of mathematical concepts, principles and rules based on the mathematical knowledge and skills that they acquired in general math. ‘intensive math II’ helps students attain higher levels of mathematical knowledge and thinking skills, and logical reasoning abilities, giving students opportunities to develop the skills and attitudes to rationally solve problems, eventually providing them with the foundation for future learning in the natural sciences, engineering and social sciences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lew, Hc., Cho, Wy., Koh, Y. et al. New challenges in the 2011 revised middle school curriculum of South Korea: mathematical process and mathematical attitude. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 109–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0392-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0392-3

Keywords

Navigation