Abstract
Comparing English and Norwegian pupils’ attitude towards mathematics, in this article I develop a deeper understanding of the factors that may shape and influence ‘pupil attitude towards mathematics’, and argue for it as a socio-cultural construct embedded in and shaped by students’ environment and context in which they learn mathematics. The theoretical framework leans on work by Zan and Di Martino (The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph 3, pp. 157–168, 2007) to elicit Norwegian and English pupils’ attitude of mathematics as they experience it in their respective environments. Whilst there were differences which could be seen to be accounted for by differently ‘figured’ environments, there are also many similarities. It was interesting to see that, albeit based on a small statistical sample, in both countries students had a positive attitude towards mathematics in year 7/8, which dropped in year 9, and increased again in years 10/11. This result could be explained and compared with other larger scale studies (e.g. Hodgen et al. in Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. 29(3), 2009). The analysis of pupils’ qualitative comments (and classroom observations) suggested seven factors that appeared to influence pupil attitude most, and these had ‘superficial’ commonalities, but the perceptions that appeared to underpin these mentions were different, and could be linked to the environments of learning mathematics in their respective classrooms. In summary, it is claimed that it is not enough to identify the factors that may shape and influence pupil attitude, but more importantly, to study how these are ‘lived’ by pupils, what meanings are made in classrooms and in different contexts, and how the factors interrelate and can be understood.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloomer, M., & Hodkinson, P. (2000). Learning careers: Continuity and change in young people’s dispositions to learning. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 583–598.
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In Jo Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. London: Ablex Publishing.
Brown, L., & Reid, D. A. (2006). Embodied cognition: Somatic markers, purposes and emotional orientations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 179–192.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cogan, L. S., & Schmidt, W. H. (1999). An examination of instructional practices in six countries. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna, & I. Huntley (Eds.), International Comparisons in mathematics education (pp. 68–85). London: Falmer.
Crossan, B., Field, J., Gallacher, J., & Merrill, B. (2003). Understanding participation in learning for non-traditional adult learners: Learning careers and the construction of learning identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 55–67.
Daskalogianni, K., & Simpson, A. (2000). Towards a definition of attitude: The relationship between the affective and the cognitive in pre-university students. In Proceedings of PME 24 (Vol. 2, pp. 217–224). Hiroshima.
DeBellis, V., & Goldin, G.A. (1999), Aspects of affect: Mathematical intimacy, mathematical integrity. In Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 249–256. Haifa: PME.
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Toward a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Fennema, E. (1989). The study of affect and mathematics: A proposed generic model for research. In Adams McLeod (Ed.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 205–219). New York: Springer.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J.A. (1976), Fennema–Sherman mathematics attitude scales. JSAS: Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6(1), MsNo. 1225.
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (1996). Rethinking characterisations of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkohnen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Goldin, G. A. (2000). Affective pathways and representations in mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 209–219.
Greer, B., Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1996). “The answer is really 4.5”: Beliefs about word problems. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkohnen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 271–292). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Grønmo, L. S., & Onstad, T. S. (Eds.). (2009). TIMMS 2007: Tegn til bedring? Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo.
Hannula, M. S. (2002). Attitude towards mathematics: Emotions, expectations and values. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 25–46.
Hannula, M., Evans, J., Philippou, G., & Zan, R. (2004), Affect in mathematics education—exploring theoretical frameworks, In Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 107–136).
Hart, L. (1989). Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean. In Adams McLeod (Ed.), Affect and mathematical problem solving (pp. 37–45). New York: Springer.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–100). New York: Macmillan.
Hodgen, J., Kuechemann, D., Brown, M., & Coe, R. (2009). Lower secondary school students’ attitudes to mathematics: Evidence from a large-scale survey in England. In M. Joubert (Ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for research into learning mathematics (Vol. 29, No. 3).
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Klette, K. (2007). Bruk av arbeidsplaner i skolen? Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift, 4, 344–358.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: CUP.
Leder, G. (2010). Beliefs: What lies behind the mirror? (downloaded 23rd November 2010). http://www.math.umt.edu/tmme/monograph3/leder_monograph3_pp.39_50.pdf.
Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (1996). Measuring mathematical beliefs and their impact on the learning of mathematics: A new approach. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkohnen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 95–113). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Lester, F. K. (1996). Implications of research on students’ beliefs for classroom practice. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkohnen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 345–353). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26–47.
Malmivuori, M. L. (1996). Self-confidence in students’ belief structures. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 4, 121–126.
McLeod, D.B. (1987). A constructivist approach to research on attitude toward mathematics. In Proceedings of the 21st PME (Vol. 1., pp 133–140). Montreal.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualisation. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 575–596). New York: Macmillan.
Op ‘t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2006). “Accepting emotional complexity”: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 193–207.
Pepin, B. (1999). The influence of national cultural traditions on pedagogy: Classroom practices in England, France and Germany. In J. Leach & B. Moon (Eds.), Learners and pedagogy (pp. 124–139). London: Sage Publications.
Pepin, B. (2009a). The role of textbooks in the ‘figured world’ of English, French and German classrooms—a comparative perspective. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships: Identities and participation (pp. 107–118). London: Routledge.
Pepin, B. (2009b). ‘Negativity’ and learner identity: Classroom tasks, the ‘minus sign’ and classroom environments in English, French and German classrooms. In J. Maass & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education—new research results (pp. 179–196). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Pepin, B. (2010). How educational systems and cultures mediate teacher knowledge: ‘listening’ in English, French and German classrooms. In K. Ruthven & T. Rowlands (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 119–137). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ruthven, K. (1987). Ability stereotyping in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 243–253.
Schreiner, C. (2008). Noen som passer for meg? Ungdoms valg av utdanning og yrke. Kimen (1) Oslo: Naturfagsenteret.
Stedøy, I. (Ed.). (2004). Mathematics education—the Nordic way, A Pre-ICME 10 production. Trondheim: NTNU trykk.
Toerner, G. (1996). Mathematical beliefs—a search for a common ground: Some theoretical considerations on structuring beliefs, some research questions, and some phenomenological observations. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkohnen, & G. Toerner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 73–94). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., Lasure, S., Van Vaerenbergh, G., Bogaerts, H., & Ratinck, E. (1999). Learning to solve mathematical applications problems: A design experiment with fifth graders. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(3), 195–229.
Warwick, D., & Osherson, S. (Eds.). (1973). Comparative research methods: An overview. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woods, P. (1996). Inside schools: Ethnography in educational research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 113–121.
Zan, R., & Di Martino, P. (2007). Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph, 3, 157–168.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to the teachers and students in the English and Norwegian schools, and to my Master students, for their support with this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Questionnaire
Appendix: Questionnaire
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pepin, B. Pupils’ attitudes towards mathematics: a comparative study of Norwegian and English secondary students. ZDM Mathematics Education 43, 535–546 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0314-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0314-9