Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mathematics education research embracing arts and sciences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a young field in its own right (unlike the ancient discipline of mathematics), mathematics education research has been eclectic in drawing upon the established knowledge bases and methodologies of other fields. Psychology served as an early model for a paradigm that valorized psychometric research, largely based in the theoretical frameworks of cognitive science. More recently, with the recognition of the need for sociocultural theories, because mathematics is generally learned in social groups, sociology and anthropology have contributed to methodologies that gradually moved away from psychometrics towards qualitative methods that sought a deeper understanding of issues involved. The emergent perspective struck a balance between research on individual learning (including learners’ beliefs and affect) and the dynamics of classroom mathematical practices. Now, as the field matures, the value of both quantitative and qualitative methods is acknowledged, and these are frequently combined in research that uses mixed methods, sometimes taking the form of design experiments or multi-tiered teaching experiments. Creativity and rigor are required in all mathematics education research, thus it is argued in this paper, using examples, that characteristics of both the arts and the sciences are implicated in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L. (2000). Working on the inside: using one’s own practice as a site for studying teaching and learning. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 365–402). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. J. (2004). Mathematics education in its cultural context. In T. P. Carpenter, J. A. Dossey, & J. L. Koehler (Eds.), Classics in mathematics education research (pp. 201–207). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reprinted from Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19 (1988), 179–191.

  • Brown, T. (1997). Mathematics education and language: Interpreting hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (2007). Putting philosophy to work. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. Yackel, E., & McClain, K. (Eds.) (2000). Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Confrey, J. (1991). Steering a course between Piaget and Vygotsky. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: A textbook of creativity. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, W. (2000). Means for meaning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 99–131). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukas, H. & Hoffmann, B. (Eds.) (1979). Albert Einstein: The human side. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Duval, R. (1999). Representations, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 3–26). Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, & Environmental Education.

  • Einstein, A. (1970). Out of my later years. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1973). Ideas and opinions. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1976). Relativity: The special and the general theory. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. (1979). The world as I see it. New York: Citadel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhart, M. A. (1988). The ethnographic research tradition and mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewert, G. D. (1991). Habermas and education: A comprehensive overview. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 345–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagatsis, A., Sriraman, B., Elia, I., & Modestou, M. (2006). Exploring young children’s geometrical strategies. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 11(2), 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundy, S. (1990). Curriculum: Product of praxis. New York: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1978). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2000). Bridging the gap between everyday and classroom mathematics: An investigation of two teachers’ intentional use of semiotic chains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.

  • Hartnett, A. E. (1982). The social sciences in educational studies: A selective guide to the literature. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1973). Thematic origins of scientific thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler, K. (2005). What is “good” educational research? Educational Researcher, 34(6), 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. K., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keats, J. (1880/1953). Ode on a Grecian urn. In H. B. Forman (Ed.), The poetical works of John Keats (pp. 233–234). London: Oxford University Press.

  • Kemmis, S. (1999). Action research. In J. P. Keeves & G. Lakomski (Eds.), Issues in educational research (pp. 150–160). New York: Pergamon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C., Pehkonen, E., & Törner, G., (Eds.) (2002). Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Lester, F. K. Jr. (Ed.) (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

  • McCormick, R., Bynner, J., Clift, P., James, M., & Brown, C. M. (Eds.) (1977).Calling education to account. London: Heinemann.

  • Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2007). Students’ improper proportional reasoning: A result of the epistemological obstacle of “linearity”. Educational Psychology, 27(1), 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millroy, W. L. (1992). An ethnographic study of the mathematics of a group of carpenters. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Monograph 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the mathematics classroom: An unknown quantity? In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 101–114). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontiveros, J. Q. (1991). Piaget and Vygotsky: Two interactionist perspectives in the construction of knowledge. In Paper presented at the fifth international conference on theory of mathematics education, Paderno Del Grappa, 20–27 June 1991.

  • Peirce, C. S. (1992). The essential Peirce (Vol. 1). In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.) Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce (Vol. 2). In The Peirce Edition Project (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1985), The role of visually mediated processes in high school mathematics: A classroom investigation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1992). Prototypes, metaphors, metonymies, and imaginative rationality in high school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 595–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1993). Mathematics—‘A bunch of formulas’? Interplay of beliefs and problem solving styles. In I. Hirabayashi, N. Nohda, K. Shigematsu, & F.-L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Tsukuba, Japan, July 18–23, Vol. 3 (pp. 57–64).

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1997a). Reasoning with metaphors and metonymies in mathematics learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 267–279). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1997b). Generalization using imagery in mathematics. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 299–312). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1998a). Balancing complex human worlds: Mathematics education as an emergent discipline in its own right. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (Vol. 1, pp. 57–70). International Commission on Mathematical Instruction Study Publication. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Presmeg, N. C. (1998b). Metaphoric and metonymic signification in mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (2006a). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (2006b). A semiotic view of the role of imagery and inscriptions in mathematics teaching and learning. Plenary Paper. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 1 (pp. 19–34). Prague, 16–21 July 2006.

  • Presmeg, N. C. (2006c). Semiotics and the “connections” standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1–2), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presmeg, N. C. (2008). Trigonometric connections through a semiotic lens. In L. Radford, G. Schubring & F. Seeger (Eds.), Semiotics in mathematics education: Epistemology, history, classroom, and culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L., Bardini, C., & Sabena, C. (2007). Perceiving the general: The multisemiotic dimension of students’ algebraic activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 507–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2008). Editorial power/authorial suffering. RISE special issue on peer review (to appear).

  • de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.) (1959). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist. Vol. I & II, Library of Living Philosophers. London: Harper & Rowe.

  • Sfard, A. (1994). Reification as the birth of metaphor. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 44–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (2000). Symbolizing mathematical reality into being—or how mathematical discourse and mathematical objects create each other. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 37–98). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (1998). Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (Ed.). (2007). International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education. The University of Montana Press: Monograph 1, The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast (http://www.math.umt.edu/TMME/Monograph1/).

  • Steen, L. A. (1990). On the shoulders of Giants: New approaches to numeracy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Congress. (2001). No child left behind Act of 2001. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mathematics Department, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA

    Norma Presmeg

Authors
  1. Norma Presmeg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norma Presmeg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Presmeg, N. Mathematics education research embracing arts and sciences. ZDM Mathematics Education 41, 131–141 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0136-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0136-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation