Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of prescribing and adherence patterns of anti-osteoporotic medications post-admission for fragility type fracture in an urban teaching hospital and a rural teaching hospital in Ireland between 2005 and 2008

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Poor adherence reduces the potential benefits of osteoporosis therapy, lowering gains in bone mineral density resulting in increased risk of fractures.

Aim

To compare prescribing and adherence patterns of anti-osteoporotic medications in patients admitted to an urban teaching hospital in Ireland with a fragility type fracture to patients admitted to a rural hospital in the North Western region.

Methodology

We identified all patients >55 years admitted to Sligo General Hospital between 2005 and 2008 with a fragility fracture (N = 744) using the hospital in-patient enquiry system (HIPE). The medical card number of those patients eligible for the primary care reimbursement services scheme (PCRS) facilitated the linkage of the HSE-PCRS scheme database to the HIPE database which enabled a study to identify persistence rates of patients prescribed osteoporosis therapy after discharge. The results were compared to the findings of a similar study carried out in St. James’s Hospital, Dublin.

Results

The 12 months post-fracture prescribing increased from 11.0 % (95 % CI 9.6, 12.4) in 2005 to 47 % (95 % CI 43.6, 50.3) in 2008 in the urban setting and from 25 % (95 % CI 21.5, 28.9) to 39 % (95 % CI 34.5, 42.7) in the rural setting. Adherence levels to osteoporosis medications at 12 months post-initiation of therapy was <50 % in both study groups. Patients on less frequent dosing regimes were better adherers.

Conclusion

The proportion of patients being discharged on anti-osteoporosis medications post-fragility fracture increased between 2005 and 2008 in both patient groups. Sub-optimal adherence levels to osteoporosis medications continue to be a major concern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A et al (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11(8):669–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A et al (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15(1):38–42 (Epub 2003 Oct 30)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lips P, Van Schoor NM (2005) Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 16(5):447–455 (Epub 2004 Dec 18)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGowan B, Casey MC, Silke C et al (2012) Hospitalizations for fracture and associated costs between 2000 and 2009 in Ireland: a trend analysis. Osteoporos Int 24(3):849–857. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2032-8 (Epub 2012 May 26)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Report of the National Steering Group on the Prevention of Falls in Older People and the Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis throughout Life (2008). Strategy to Prevent Falls and Fractures in Ireland’s Ageing Population. 2008 January. Available from URL: http://www.hse.ie/eng/services/Publications/services/Older/Strategy_to_Prevent_Falls_and_Fractures_in_Ireland%E2%80%99s_Ageing_Population_-_Full_report.pdf, Accessed 20 May 2012

  6. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H et al (2013) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 24(1):23–57. doi:10.1007/s00198-012-2074-y (Epub 2012 Oct 19)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elliott-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA et al (2004) Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 15(10):767–778 (Epub 2004 Jul 16)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleurence RL, Iglesias CP, Torgerson DJ (2006) Economic evaluations of interventions for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a structured review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 17(1):29–40 (Epub 2005 Jun 25)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabenda V, Vanoverloop J, Fabri V et al (2008) Low incidence of anti-osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90(10):2142–2148. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.00864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zethraeus N, Borgstrom F, Strom O et al (2007) Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis-a review of the literature and a reference model. Osteoporos Int 38(6):922–928 (Epub 2005 Dec 5)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38(6):922–928 (Epub 2005 Dec 5)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imaz I, Zegarra P, Gonzalez-Enriquez J et al (2010) Poor bisphosphonate adherence for treatment of osteoporosis increases fracture risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 21(11):1943–1951. doi:10.1007/s00198-009-1134-4 (Epub 2009 Dec 5)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rabenda V, Hiligsmann M, Reginster J-Y (2009) Poor adherence to oral bisphosphonate treatment and its consequences: a review of the evidence. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10(14):2303–2315. doi:10.1517/14656560903140533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siris ES, Selby PL, Saag KG et al (2009) Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe. Am J Med 122(2 Suppl):S3–S13. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Danese MD, Badamgarav E, Bauer DC (2009) Effect of adherence on lifetime fractures in osteoporotic women treated with daily and weekly bisphosphonates. J Bone Miner Res 24(11):1819–1826. doi:10.1359/jbmr.090506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Bruyere O et al (2010) The clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients. Health Policy 96(2):170–177. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.014 (Epub 2010 Feb 13)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Gathon HJ et al (2010) Potential clinical and economic impact of nonadherence with osteoporosis medications. Calcif Tissue Int 86(3):202–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Landfeldt E, Lundkvist J, Strom O (2011) The societal burden of poor persistence to treatment of osteoporosis in Sweden. Bone 48(2):380–388. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.09.012 (Epub 2010 Sep 17)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hiligsmann M, McGowan B, Bennett K et al (2012) The clinical and economic burden of poor adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications in Ireland. Value Health 15(5):604–612. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.001 (Epub 2012 Apr 11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N et al (2008) Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD000011. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  21. McDonald HP, Garg AX, Haynes RB (2002) Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions: scientific review. JAMA 288(22):2868–2879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hiligsmann M, Ravenda V, Bruyere O et al (2010) The clinical and economic burden of non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates in osteoporotic patients. Health Policy 96(2):170–177. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.01.014 (Epub 2010 Feb 13)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Patrick AR, Schousboe JT, Losina E et al (2011) The economics of improving medication adherence in osteoporosis: validation and application of a simulation model. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(9):2762–2770. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0575 (Epub 2011 Jul 6)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Copher C, Buzinec P, Zarotsky V et al (2010) Physician perception of patient adherence to osteoporosis medications from pharmacy claims. Curr Med Res Opin 26(4):777–785. doi:10.1185/03007990903579171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Iversen MD, Vora RR, Servi A et al (2011) Factors affecting adherence to osteoporosis medications: a focus group approach examining viewpoints of patients and providers. J Geriatr Phys Ther 34(2):72–81. doi:10.1097/JPT.0b013e3181ff03b4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. International Osteoporosis Foundation (2005) The adherence gap: why osteoporosis patients don’t continue with treatment. www.iofbonehealthorg/download/ostefound/filemanager/publications/pdf/adherence_gap_reportpdf, Accessed 26 May 2012

  27. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Britten N (2003) What information do patients need about medicines? “Doing prescribing”: how doctors can be more effective. BMJ 327(7419):864–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis DK, Robinson J, Wilkinson E (2003) Factors involved in deciding to start preventive treatment: qualitative study of clinicians’ and lay people’s attitudes. BMJ 327(7419):841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Louviere JJ, Islam T (2008) A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling. J Bus Res 61(9):903–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D et al (2006) Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 333(7565):417 (Epub 2006 Aug 14)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Elwyn G, Kreuwel I, Durand MA et al (2011) How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map. Patient Educ Couns 82(2):260–265. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.034 (Epub 2010 Jun 2)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McGowan B, Bennett K, Marry J, Walsh JB, Casey MC (2012) Patient profile in a bone health and osteoporosis prevention service in Ireland. IJMS 181(4):511–515. doi:10.1007/s11845-012-0806-9 (Epub 2012 Feb 29)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Health Services Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Service (HSE-PCRS) for providing the prescribing data for the present study and the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) units in both St. James’s hospital and Sligo Regional Hospital for providing the discharge fracture data.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this article have “no competing interests”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. McGowan.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Distribution of the ICD—10 codes used to identify typical and atypical osteoporotic type fractures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGowan, B., Bennett, K., Casey, M.C. et al. Comparison of prescribing and adherence patterns of anti-osteoporotic medications post-admission for fragility type fracture in an urban teaching hospital and a rural teaching hospital in Ireland between 2005 and 2008. Ir J Med Sci 182, 601–608 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0935-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-013-0935-9

Keywords

Navigation