Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive Component

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mass of automotive components has a direct influence on several aspects of vehicle performance, including both fuel consumption and tailpipe emissions, but the real environmental benefit has to be evaluated considering the entire life of the products with a proper life cycle assessment. In this context, the present paper analyzes the environmental burden connected to the production of a safety-relevant aluminum high-pressure die-casting component for commercial vehicles (a suspension cross-beam) considering all the phases connected to its manufacture. The focus on aluminum high-pressure die casting reflects the current trend of the industry and its high energy consumption. This work shows a new method that deeply analyzes every single step of the component’s production through the implementation of a wide database of primary data collected thanks to collaborations of some automotive supplier companies. This energy analysis shows significant environmental benefits of aluminum recycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Helms and U. Lambrecht, Int. J. LCA (2006). doi:10.1065/lca2006.07258.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Das, JOM 52, 41 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Hirsch, Mater. Forum 28, 15 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Kasai, JSAE Rev. 20, 387 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.S. Cole and A.M. Sherman, Mater. Charact. 35, 3 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.W. Hadley, S. Das, and J.W. Mille, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2000). doi:10.2172/814613.

  7. A.A. Luo, A.K. Sachdev and B.R. Powell, China Foundry 7, 463 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.R. Gunasegaram and A. Tharumarajah, Metal. Trans. B 40, 605 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.B. Guinée, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7, 311 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. International Standard Organisation (ISO), ISO14040: Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Framework (Geneva: ISO, 2006), pp. 1–20.

  11. J. Green, Aluminum Recycling and Processing for Energy Conservation and Sustainability (Novelty, OH: ASM International, 2007), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.C. Kim and T.J. Wallington, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 6089 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Kim, C. McMillan, G.A. Keoleian and S.J. Skerlos, J. Ind. Ecol. 14, 929 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Wagner, J. Provo, and C. Koffler, Comparative Life Cycle assessment of Aluminum and Steel Truck Wheels (Alcoa, 2012). http://www.alcoawheels.com/alcoawheels/north_america/en/pdf/Alcoa_Comparative_LCA_of_Truck_Wheels_with_CR_statement.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2012.

  15. C.A. Ungureanu, S. Das and I.S. Jawahir, in Aluminum Alloys Transport, Package, Aerospace. Other Applications, Proceedings Symposium, ed. S.K. Das and W. Yin (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 2007), pp. 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Dalquist and T. Gutowski, Life Cycle Analysis of Conventional Manufacturing Techniques: Die Casting (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Paper no. LMP-MIT-TGG-03-12-09-2004). http://web.mit.edu/ebm/Publications/Die%20Casting%20Dalquist%20Gutowski.pdf. Accessed 8 June 2014.

  17. R. Singh, C.D. Singh and S. Singh Sidhu, IJMDEBM 1, 21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.R. Gunasegaram and A. Tharumarajah, Metal. Trans. B 40B, 605 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Mathieux and D. Brissaud, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55, 92 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. European Aluminium Association, Environmental Profile Report for the European Aluminium Industry (European Aluminum Association, 2013). http://european-aluminium.eu/media/1329/environmental-profile-report-for-the-european-aluminium-industry.pdf. Accessed Apr 2013.

  21. C. Panseri, Manuale di fonderia dell’alluminio (Milan, IT: Hoelpi, 1966), p. 439.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Nagendra Parashar and R.K. Mittal, in Elements of Manufacturing Processes (New Delhi, IN: Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, 2006), p. 233.

  23. H. Bakemeyer, Report No. E-902 (NADCA, Arlington Heights, IL, 2008).

  24. M. Bertram, M. Hryniuk, G. Kirchner and F. Pruvost, Aluminium Recycling in Europe (Brussels, BL: EAA/OEA Recycling Division), p. 1.

  25. R. Dhingra and S. Das, J. Clean. Prod. 85, 347 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The component object of the study was developed by Streparava SpA. The authors are grateful to Streparava SpA and Mr. Antonio Gandellini for support in providing data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Cecchel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cecchel, S., Cornacchia, G. & Panvini, A. Cradle-to-Gate Impact Assessment of a High-Pressure Die-Casting Safety-Relevant Automotive Component. JOM 68, 2443–2448 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2046-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-016-2046-3

Keywords

Navigation