Skip to main content
Log in

Electro-Fenton treatment of synthetic organic dyes: Influence of operational parameters and kinetic study

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work investigates oxidative decolorization of two different dyes, Methylene blue and Titan yellow in aqueous solution using an environmentally friendly advanced electro-chemical oxidation (electro-Fenton) process. The effect of operating conditions like H2O2 concentration, current density, initial dye concentration was studied in a batch stirred cell. Individual decolorization decay kinetics for both dyes was investigated. The second-order absolute rate constants (L mol−1 s−1) between hydroxyl radical and dye have been calculated from experimental data by fitting it to the decolorization model. The apparent kinetic constants, k app (s−1) for Methylene blue and Titan yellow dye decolorization were also determined. The experimental data showed a good fit to the theoretical model, which can predict data in a wide range of % dye decolorization. This process also reduces COD of the dye solution, and the unit energy demand (UED) in kWh/kg COD removed for different electrical current has been reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. K. Gupta, A. Pal and C. Sahoo, Dyes Pigm., 69, 224 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Q. Z. Dai, M. H. Zhou and L. C. Lei, J. Hazard. Mater., 137, 1870 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Lata, V. K. Garg and R. K. Gupta, Dyes Pigm., 74, 653 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. X. S. Wang, Y. Zhou, Y. Jiang and C. Sun, J. Hazard. Mater., 157, 374 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. V.K. Garg, M. Amita, R. Kumar and R. Gupta, Dyes Pigm., 63, 243 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Robinson, B. Chandran and P. Nigam, Environ. Int., 28, 29 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Wang, Y. Boyjoo and A. Choueib, Chemosphere, 60, 1401 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O. Hamdaoui, J. Hazard. Mater., 135, 264 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. S. Poon, Q. P. Huang and C. Fung, Chemosphere, 38, 1005 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. B. Xie and X. Z. Li, Mater. Chem. Phys., 95, 39 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. K. V. Kumar and A. Kumaran, J. Biochem. Eng., 27, 83 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Ozer, G. Dursun and A. Ozer, J. Hazard. Mater., 144, 171 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Papic, D. Vujevic, N. Koprivanac and D. Sinko, J. Hazard. Mater., 164, 1137 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Y.H. Huang, S. Chou, M.G. Perng, G. H. Huang and S. S. Cheng, Water Sci. Technol., 39, 145 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Brillas, J. C. Calpe and J. Casado, Water Res., 34, 2253 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. H. Lin and C. C. Chang, Water Res., 34, 4243 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Cruz-Gonzalez, O. Torres-Lopez, A. Garcia-Leon, J. L. Guzman-Mar, L. H. Reyes, A. Hernandez-Ramirez and J. M. Peralta-Hernandez, Chem. Eng. J., 160, 199 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. Juttner, U. Galla and H. Schmieder, Electrochim. Acta, 45, 2575 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. E. J. Ruiz, C. Arias, E. Brillas, A. Hernandez-Ramirez and J. M. Peralta-Hernandez, Chemosphere, 82, 495 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. A. Martinez-Huitle and E. Brillas, Appl. Catal., B, 87, 105 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. G.Q. Zhang, F. L. Yang, M.M. Gao, X.H. Fang and L. F. Liu, Electrochim. Acta, 53, 5155 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Pletcher and F. C. Walsh, Industrial Electrochemistry, 2nd Ed., Chapman and Hall, London, UK (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. H. Lin and M. L. Chen, Environ. Technol., 16, 693 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. H. Gau and F. S. Chang, Wat. Sci. Technol., 34, 455 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. Brillas and J. Casado, Chemosphere, 47, 241 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. A. Oturan, J. Peiroten, P. Chartrin and A. J. Acher, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 3474 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Panizza and G. Cerisola, Water Res., 35, 3987 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Lahkimi, M. A. Oturan and N. Oturan, Environ. Chem. Lett., 5, 35 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. E. Guivarch, S. Trevin, C. Lahitte and M. A. Oturan, Environ. Chem. Lett., 1, 38 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. E. Rosales, M. Pazos, M. A. Longo and M. A. Sanroman, Chem. Eng. J., 155, 62 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Bensalah, M.A. Quiroz Alfaro and C.A. Martnez-Huitle, Chem. Eng. J., 149, 348 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Panizza and G. Cerisola, Water Res., 43, 339 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. L. S. Clesceri, A. E. Greenberg and D. Andrew, Standard methods for the Examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed., APHA, Washington, DC (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  34. I. Talini and G. K. Anderson, Water Res., 26, 107 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. W. G. Kuo, Water Res., 26, 881 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. P. Ghosh, A.N. Samanta and S. Ray, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 88, 1021 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Zhou, Q. Yu, L. Lei and G. Barton, Sep. Purif. Technol., 57, 380 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Zhou, Q. Yu and L. Lei, Dyes Pigm., 77, 129 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Pera-Titus, V. Garcia-Molina, M.A. Banos, J. Gimenez and S. Esplugas, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 47, 219 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. B.G. Kwon, D. S. Lee, N. Kang and J. Yoon, Water Res., 33, 2110 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. M. El-Dein, J.A. Libra and U. Wiesmann, Water Sci. Technol., 44, 295 (2001).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. J. H. Ramirez, F. M. Duarte, F.G. Martins, C. A. Costa and L. M. Madeira, Chem. Eng. J., 148, 394 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. A. R. Khataee, V. Vatanpour and A. R. Amani Ghadim, J. Hazard. Mater., 161, 1225 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. S. Altin, Int. J. Chem. Reactor Eng., 9, A33 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Altin, Sep. Purif. Technol., 61, 391 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. C.T. Wang, J. L. Hu, W. L. Chou and Y.M. Kuo, J. Hazard. Mater., 152, 601 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. E. Brillas, I. Sires and M. A. Oturan, Chem. Rev., 109, 6570 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabir Ghosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, P., Thakur, L.K., Samanta, A.N. et al. Electro-Fenton treatment of synthetic organic dyes: Influence of operational parameters and kinetic study. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 1203–1210 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-012-0011-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-012-0011-6

Key words

Navigation