Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismic displacement demand prediction in non-linear domain: Optimization of the N2 method

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Europe, computation of displacement demand for seismic assessment of existing buildings is essentially based on a simplified formulation of the N2 method as prescribed by Eurocode 8 (EC8). However, a lack of accuracy of the N2 method in certain conditions has been pointed out by several studies. This paper addresses the assessment of effectiveness of the N2 method in seismic displacement demand determination in non-linear domain. The objective of this work is to investigate the accuracy of the N2 method through comparison with displacement demands computed using non-linear time-history analysis (NLTHA). Results show that the original N2 method may lead to overestimation or underestimation of displacement demand predictions. This may affect results of mechanical model-based assessment of seismic vulnerability at an urban scale. Hence, the second part of this paper addresses an improvement of the N2 method formula by empirical evaluation of NLTHA results based on EC8 ground-classes. This task is formulated as a mathematical programming problem in which coefficients are obtained by minimizing the overall discrepancy between NLTHA and modified formula results. Various settings of the mathematical programming problem have been solved using a global optimization metaheuristic. An extensive comparison between the original N2 method formulation and optimized formulae highlights benefits of the strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA (1992), “Non-Stationary Spectral Matching,” Seismological Research Letters, 63(1): 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albidah AS, Altheeb AH, Lam NTK and Wilson JL (2015), “Modelling Non-Linear Behaviour of Lightly Reinforced Concrete Walls,” Proceedings of the Tenth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering “Building an Earthquake Resilient Pacifics, 6–8 November 2015, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allahabadi R and Powell GH (1988), “Drain-2DX User Guide,” Report No. UCB/EERC-88/06, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadio C, Rinaldin G and Fragiacomo M (2016), “Investigation on the Accurancy of the N2 Method and the Equivalent Linearization Procedure for Different Hysteretic Models,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 83: 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N, Smit P, Sigbjornsson R, Suhadolc P and Margaris B (2002), Internet Site for European Strong-Motion Data, European Commission, Research Directorate General, Environment and Climate Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC (Applied Technology Council) (2005), FEMA 440-Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, By: Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas DP (1999), Nonlinear Programming, Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D and Tsitsiklis JN (1997), Introduction to Linear Optimization, Vol. 6, Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachetti P et al. (1997), “A New Version of the Price’s Algorithm for Global Optimization,” Journal of Global Optimization, 10(2): 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2004), Eurocode8: Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures-Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, EN 1998–1:2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P and Fischinger M (1988), “N2-a Method for Non-Linear Seismic Analysis of Regular Buildings,” Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, August 2–9 1988, Tokyo–Kyoto, Japan (Vol. V).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2000), “A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance Based Seismic Design,” Earthquake Spectra, 16(3): 573–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel DB (2006), Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence, Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziotti F, Penna A, Bossi E and Magenes G (2014), “Evaluation of Displacement Demand for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings by Equivalent SDOF Systems,” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014, Porto, Portugal, 30 June 2014, Cunha A, Caetano E, Muller G (eds).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrini G, Graziotti F, Penna A and Magenes G (2017), “Improved Evaluation of Inelastic Displacement Demands for Short-Period Masonry Structures,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(9): 1411–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagomarsino S and Giovinazzi S (2006), “Macroseismic and Mechanical Models for the Vulnerability and Damage Assessment of Current Buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4(4): 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonetti M, Kormushev P and Sagratella S (2012), “Combining Local and Global Direct Derivative-Free Optimization for Reinforcement Learning,” Cybernetics and Information Technologies, 12(3): 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P (2002), “Effective Stiffness of RC Walls in Dynamic Tests,” Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper reference 861, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P, Belmouden Y and Trueb M (2007), “Non-Linear Seismic Behaviour of Structures with Limited Hysteretic Energy Dissipation Capacity,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5(4): 549–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P and Badoux M (2003a), “An Experimental Confirmation of The Equal Displacement Rule for RC Structural Walls,” Proceedings of the Fib-Symposium: Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Paper No. 127, May 6–8, 2003, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P and Badoux M (2003b), “The Gamma Model: a Simple Hysteretic Model for RC Walls,” Proceedings of the fib-Symposium: Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Paper No. 126, May 6–8, 2003, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P and Badoux M (2008), Génie Parasismique, Conception et Dimensionnement des Batiments, Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes. (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P et al. (2016), “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment at Urban Scale for Two Typical Swiss Cities Using Risk-UE Methodology,” Natural Hazards, 84(1): 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y and Miranda E (2008), “Noniterative Equivalent Linear Method for Evaluation of Existing Structures,” J. Struct. Eng., 134(11): 1685–1695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linda AA and Abrahamson NA (2010), “An Improved Method for Nonstationary Spectral Matching,” Earthquake Spectra, 26(3): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litton RW (1975), “A Contribution to the Analysis of Concrete Structures under Cyclic Loading,” Ph.D. Thesis, Civil Engineering Dept., University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli E and Faella C (2015), “Nonlinear Static Analyses Based on Either Inelastic or Elastic Spectra with Equivalent Viscous Damping: A Parametric Comparison,” Engineering Structures, 88: 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel C, Lestuzzi P and Lacave C (2014), “Simplified Non-Linear Seismic Displacement Demand Prediction for Low Period Structures,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 12(4): 1563–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda E and Bertero V (1994), “Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design,” Earthquake Spectra, 10(2): 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM and Hall WJ (1973), “Seismic Design Criteria for Nuclear Reactor Facilities,” Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 209–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oropeza M, Favez P and Lestuzzi P (2010), “Seismic Response of Nonstructural Components in Case of Nonlinear Structures Based on Floor Response Spectra Method,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2): 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otani S (1974), “Inelastic Analysis of R/C Frame Structures,” Journal of the Structural Division, 100(7): 1433–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddell R, Hidalgo P and Cruz E (1989), “Response Modification Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design of Short Period Structures,” Earthquake Spectra, 5(3): 571–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Garcia JN and Miranda E (2003), “Inelastic Displacement Ratios for Evaluation of Existing Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(8): 1237–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiidi M and Sozen MA (1981), “Simple Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of R/C Structures,” Journal of the Structural Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 107(ST5): 937–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab P and Lestuzzi P (2007), “Assessment of the Non-Linear Seismic Behaviour of Ductile Wall Structures due to Synthetic Earthquakes,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5(4): 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storn R and Price K (1997), “Differential Evolution-a Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces,” Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4): 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda T, Sozen MA and Nielsen NN (1970), “Reinforced Concrete Response to Simulated Earthquakes,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 96(12): 2557–2573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaculik J, Lumantarna E, Griffith M, Lam N and Wilson J (2007), “Dynamic Response Behaviour of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Subject to Out of Plane Loading,” Proceedings of 2007 Australian Earthquake Engineering Society Conference, pp. 1–8, Wollongong, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veletsos A and Newmark N (1960), “Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motion,” In: 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2: 895–912. Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidic T, Fajfar P and Fischinger M (1994), “Consistent Inelastic Design Spectra: Strength and Displacement,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23(5): 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EPFL – ENAC – IIC – IMAC, Bâtiment GC (G1.567), Station 18, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Lorenzo Diana & Pierino Lestuzzi

  2. DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Manno

Authors
  1. Lorenzo Diana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Manno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pierino Lestuzzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Diana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diana, L., Manno, A. & Lestuzzi, P. Seismic displacement demand prediction in non-linear domain: Optimization of the N2 method. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 18, 141–158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0495-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0495-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation