Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the seismic non-linear behavior of ductile wall structures due to synthetic earthquakes

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, different methods for generating synthetic earthquakes are compared in terms of related non-linear seismic response of ductile structures. The objective of the investigation is to formulate recommendations for the use of synthetic earthquakes for reliable seismic analysis. The comparison is focused on the accuracy of the reproduction of the characteristics of the structural non-linear response due to recorded earthquakes. First the investigations are carried out for non-linear single-degree-of-freedom systems. Later, the results are validated for a set of realistic buildings modelled as multi-degree-of-freedom systems. Various options of the classical stationary simulation procedure of SIMQKE and a non-stationary simulation procedure proposed by Sabetta and Pugliese are examined and compared. The adopted methodology uses a set of recorded earthquakes as a reference. Hundred synthetic accelerograms are generated for each examined simulation option with the condition that the related elastic responses are similar to those of the reference set. The non-linear single-degree-of-freedom systems are defined using six recognized hysteretic models and four levels of increasing non-linearity. The non-linear responses computed for the reference set and the studied simulation options are then statistically compared in terms of displacement ductility and energy. The results show that the implementation of the classical stationary procedure always leads to a significant underestimation of the ductility demand and a significant overestimation of the energy demand. By contrast, non-stationary time histories produce much better results. The results with the multi-degree-of-freedom systems are shown to confirm these conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allahabadi R, Powell GH (1988) Drain-2DX user guide. Report No. UCB/EERC-88/06. College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Elenas A (2002) Seismic damage potential described by spectral intensity parameters. In Procceedings of the 12th european conference on earthquake engineering. Paper 267, London

  • Eurocode 8 (2004). Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seimic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1; 2004. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brüssel

  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 273). (1997) NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington DC

  • Gasparini DA, Vanmarcke EH (1976) Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. MIT civil engineering research report R76-4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestuzzi P, Badoux M (2003) The gamma-Model: A Simple Hysteretic Model For Reinforced Concrete Walls. Paper n° 126. In: Proceedings of the fib-symposium: concrete structures in seismic regions. Athens, Greece

  • Lestuzzi P, Schwab P, Koller M, Lacave C (2004) How to Choose Earthquake Recordings for Non-linear Seismic Analysis of Structures. In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Litton RW (1975) A contribution to the analysis of concrete structures under cyclic loading. Civil Engineering Dept., University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassar AA, Krawinkler H (1991) Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems research Report No. 95. The John A. Blume earthquake engineering Center. Department of Civil Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Otani A (1974) Inelastic analysis of R/C frame structures. J Struct Div ASCE 100 (ST):1433– 1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Saactioglu M (1991) Modeling hysteretic force deformation relationships for R/C elements. In: Earthquake-resistant concrete structures.: inelastic response and Design Special publication SP-127 of the American concrete institute (ACI). Detroit, Michigan

  • Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2):337–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiidi M, Sozen MA (1981) Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures. J Struct Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 107 (ST5): 937–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab P (2002) Influence of seismic characteristics on the dynamic nonlinear response of structures. Master thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit P et al (2000) European Strong Motion Database. European Council, Environment and Climate Research Programme (CD-Rom)

  • Takeda T, Sozen MA, Nielsen NN (1970) Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. J Struct Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 96(ST12): 2557–2573

    Google Scholar 

  • Valles RE, Reinhorn AM, Kunnath SK, Li C, Madan A (1996) IDARC 2D Version 4.0: a program for inelastic damage analysis of buildings. Technical Report NCEER-96-0010, State University of New York at Buffalo, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierino Lestuzzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwab, P., Lestuzzi, P. Assessment of the seismic non-linear behavior of ductile wall structures due to synthetic earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng 5, 67–84 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9016-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9016-z

Keywords

Navigation