Skip to main content
Log in

Intergrain contact density indices for granular mixes—II: Liquefaction resistance

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether the presence of non-plastic silt in a granular mix soil impact its liquefaction potential and how to evaluate liquefaction resistance of sand containing different amounts of silt contents are both controversial issues. This paper presents the results of an experimental evaluation to address these issues. Two parameters, namely, equivalent intergranular void ratio (e c)eq and equivalent interfine void ratio (e f)eq, proposed in a companion paper (Thevanayagam, 2007) as indices of active grain contacts in a granular mix, are used to characterize liquefaction resistance of sands and silty sands. Results indicate that, at the same global void ratio (e), liquefaction resistance of silty sand decreases with an increase in fines content (C F) up to a threshold value (C Fth). This is due to a reduction in intergrain contact density between the coarse grains. Beyond C Fth, with further addition of fines, the interfine contacts become significant while the inter-coarse grain contacts diminish and coarse grains become dispersed. At the same e, the liquefaction resistance increases and the soil becomes stronger with a further increase in silt content. Beyond a limiting fines content (C FL), the liquefaction resistance is controlled by interfine contacts only. When C F < C Fth, at the same (e c)eq, the liquefaction resistance of silty sand is comparable to that of the host clean sand at a void ratio equal to (e c)eq. When C F > C Fth, at the same (e f)eq, the cyclic strength of a sandy silt is comparable to the host silt at a void ratio equal to (e f)eq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews DCA (1998), “Liquefaction of Silty Soils: Susceptibility, Deformation, and Remediation,” PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Eng., University of Southern California, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DCA and Martin GR. (2000). “Criteria for Liquefaction of Silty Soils,” Proc. 12th WCEE 2000 Conf., Auckland, NZ.

  • Berrill JB and Davis RO (1985), “Energy Dissipation and Seismic Liquefaction in Sands: Revised Model,” Soils and Found., Tokyo, 25(2): 106–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chameau JL and Sutterer K (1994), “Influence of Fines in Liquefaction Potential and Steady State Considerations,” Proc., 13th Intl. Conf. On Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., New Delhi, India, 183–84.

  • Chang NY (1990), “Influence of Fines Content and Plasticity on Earthquake-induced Soil Liquefaction,” Contract No. DACW3988-C-0078, US Army WES, MS.

  • Davis RO and Berrill, JB (1982), “Energy Dissipation and Seismic Liquefaction in Sands,” Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dyn., 19: 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RO and Berrill JB (1998a), “Energy Dissipation and Liquefaction at Port Island, Kobe,” Bull. New Zealand Nat. Soc. For Earthq. Engrg., Waikanae, New Zealand, 31: 31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis RO and Berrill JB (1998b), “Site-specific Prediction of Liquefaction,” Geotechnique, London, 48(2): 289–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai CS (2000), “Evaluation of Liquefaction Using Disturbed State and Energy Approaches,” J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Eng., ASCE, 126(7), 618–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans MD and Zhou S (1995), “Liquefaction Behavior of Sand-gravel Composites,” J. Geoech. Eng., ASCE, 121(3): 287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa JL, Saada AS, Liang L and Dahisaria MN (1994), “Evaluation of Soil Liquefaction by Energy Principles,” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 120(9): 1554–1569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn LWD, Ledbetter RH and Guoxi Wu (1994), “Liquefaction in Silty Soils: Design and Analysis,” ASCE Geotech. Spec. Publ. 44, eds. S. Prakash and P. Dakoulas, 51–76.

  • Georgiannou VN, Burland JB and Hight DW (1990), “The Undrained Behaviour of Clayey Sands in Triaxial Compression and Extension,” Geotechnique, 40(3): 431–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiannou VN Hight DW and Burland JB (1991), “Undrained Behaviour of Natural and Model Clayey Sands,” Soils and Foundations, 31(3): 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K. (1993), “Liquefaction and Flow Failure During Earthquakes,” Geotechnique, 43(3): 351–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JGS (1996), “Soils and Foundations — Special Issue on Geotechnical Aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake,” Japanese Soc. Geotech. Eng.

  • Kanagalingam T (2006), Liquefaction Resistance of Granular Mixes Based on Contact Density and Energy Considerations,” PhD Dissertation, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanagalingam T and Thevanayagam S (2006), “Contribution of Fines to the Compressive Strength of Mixed Soils,” Discussion, Geotechnique.

  • Kayen RE and Mitchell JK (1997), “Assessment of Liquefaction Potnetialduring Earthquakes by Arias Intensity,” J. Geotech. And Geoenviron. Engrg., ASCE, 123(12): 1162–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koester JP (1994), “The Influence of Fines Type and Conent on Cyclic Strength,” Proc. ASCE Conv., Atlanta, Geotech. Spec. Pub., 44: pp. 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuerbis R, Nagussey D and Vaid YP (1988), “Effect of Gradation and Fines Content on the Undrained Response of Sand”, Proc. Conf. Hyd. Fill Struc., ASCE Geot. Spec. Publ. 21: pp. 30–45

  • Law KT, Cao YL, and He GN (1990), “An Energy Approach for Assessing Seismic Liquefaction Potential,” Can. Geotech. J., Ottawa, 27: pp.320–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang., L, Figueroa JL and Saada AS (1995), “Liquefaction Under Random Loading: Unit Energy Approach,” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 121(11): 776–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (1993), Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemat-Nasser S and Shokooh A (1979), “A Unified Approach to Densification and Liquefaction of Cohesionless Sand in Cyclic Shearing,” Can. Geotech. J., 16: 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni Q, Tan TS, Dasari GR and Hight DW (2004), “Contribution of Fines to the Compressive Strength of Mixed Soils,” Geotechnique, 54(9): 561–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitman TD, Robertson PK and Sego DC (1994), “Influence of Fines on the Collapse of Loose Sands,” Can. Geotech. J., 31: 728–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polito CP and Martin II, JR (2001), “Effects of Nonplastic Fines on the Liquefaction Resistance of Sands,” J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 127(5): 408–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe KH (1970), “The Influence of Strains in Soil Mechanics,” Geotechnique, 20(2): 129–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB (1987), “Design Problems in Soil Liquefaction”, J. Geot. Eng. Div., ASCE, 113(8): 827–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed RB and Harder LF Jr. (1990), “SPT-based Analysis of Cyclic Pore Pressure Generation and Undrained Residual Strength,” Proc., Seed Mem. Symp., 2: pp. 351–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM and Arango I (1983), “Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data,” J. Geot. Eng. Div., ASCE, 109(3): 458–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S (1994), “Liquefaction Characteristics of Silts,” Ground Failures Under Seismic Conditions, Proc., ASCE Nat. Convention, Geotech Spec. Publ. 44, S. Prakash and P. Dakoulas, eds., ASCE, Reston, Va., pp. 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S (1998), “Effect of Fines and Confining Stress on Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Sands,” J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 124(6): 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S (2000), “Liquefaction Potential and Undrained Fragility of Silty Sands,” Proc. 12th International Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, eds. R. Park, paper #.2383.

  • Thevanayagam S (2007), “Intergrain Contact Density Indices for Granular Mixes — I: Framework,” J. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations, 6(2).

  • Thevanayagam S, Ravishankar K and Mohan S (1996), “Steady State Strength, Relative Density and Fines Content Relationship for Sands,” TRB 1547, pp. 61–67.

  • Thevanayagam S, Shenthan T and Kanagalingam T (2003), “Role of Intergranular Contacts on Mechanisms Causing Liquefaction & Slope Failures in Silty Sands,” Research Report, http://erp-web.er.usgs.gov/reports/abstract/2001/pt/01hqgr0032-report.pdf, U.S. Geological Survey, Dept. of Interior, USA, 396p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S, Shenthan T, Mohan S and Liang J (2002), “Undrained Fragility of Sands, Silty Sands and Silt,” J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Eng., ASCE, 128(10): 849–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovska MI and Trifunac MD (1999), “Liquefaction Opportunity Mapping via Seismic Wave Energy,” J. Geotech. & Geoenv. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 125(12): 1032–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD (1995), “Empirical Criteria for Liquefaction in Sands via Standard Penetration Tests and Seismic Wave Energy,” J. Soil Dyn. and Earthq. Eng., 14: 419–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaid YP (1994), “Liquefaction of Silty Soils,” ASCE Conv., Geotech. Spec. Publ. 44: pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA and Lade PV (1998), “Steady-state Concepts and Static Liquefaction of Silty Sands,” J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 124(9): 868–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatovic S and Ishihara K (1997), “Nomralized Behavior of Very Loose Non-plastic Soils: Effects of Fabric,” Soils and Foundations, 37(4): 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Thevanayagam.

Additional information

Supported by: National Science Foundation and USGS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thevanayagam, S. Intergrain contact density indices for granular mixes—II: Liquefaction resistance. Earthq. Engin. Engin. Vib. 6, 135–146 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0706-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-007-0706-6

Keywords

Navigation