Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new empirical chart for coal burst liability classification using Kriging method

一种基于Kriging法的煤层冲击倾向性分类图

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal burst is a catastrophic event that induced by a large variety of certainty and uncertainty factors, and many methods have been proposed to evaluate the risk of this hazard. Conventional evaluation models or empirical criteria are influenced by the complex modelling process or undesirable accuracy. In this study, a total of 147 groups of coal burst records were used to establish the empirical classification model based on elastic energy index (Wet) and impact energy index (Kc). The classification boundaries of coal burst liabilities (CBLs), which was fitted to quantitatively analyze the risk level, and its distribution characteristics are displayed on 2D chart using Kriging method. Additionally, 43 groups of test samples were collected to further validate the reliability of the constructed spatial interpolation model. The results revealed that the classification performance of Kriging model outperforms other uncertainty-based method with accuracy 91%. It can be a valuable and helpful tool for designers to conduct the geological hazard prevention and initial design.

摘要

冲击地压是一种由多种确定性和不确定性因素共同作用的地质灾害, 目前已探索出多种冲击地压灾 害预警方法。然而, 传统的评价模型或经验方法常面临建模过程复杂和分类准确率低等问题。为此, 本文通过147 组包含弹性能量指数(Wet)和冲击能量指数(Ke)的煤层冲击倾向性数据, 提出了基于Kriging 空间插值的冲击地压分类经验模型。该模型中, 运用2D分类图展示样本冲击倾向性的空间分布并对其分类边界予以拟合, 并用43 组测试样本验证了Kriging 模型的分类表现。结果表明: Kriging模型的分类准确性为91%, 优于其他的不确定性评价模型。本文构建的Kriging 模型能为煤矿冲击地压灾害预警和采矿设计提供有力依据。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ZHOU Jian, CHEN Chao, WANG Ming-zheng, et al, Proposing a novel comprehensive evaluation model for the coal burst liability in underground coal mines considering uncertainty factors [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2021, 31(5): 799–812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. WANG Chun-lai, CAO Cong, LI Chang-feng, et al, Experimental investigation on synergetic prediction of granite rockburst using rock failure time and acoustic emission energy [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(4): 1262–1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-4971-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. WANG Shi-ming, ZHOU Jian, LI Chuan-qi, et al, Rockburst prediction in hard rock mines developing bagging and boosting tree-based ensemble techniques [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(2): 527–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-021-4619-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CAO An-ye, DOU Lin-ming, WANG Chang-bin, et al, Microseismic precursory characteristics of rock burst hazard in mining areas near a large residual coal pillar: A case study from Xuzhuang Coal Mine, Xuzhou, China [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(11): 4407–4422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1036-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. WANG Gui-feng, GONG Si-yuan, LI Zhen-lei, et al, Evolution of stress concentration and energy release before rock bursts: Two case studies from Xingan coal mine, Hegang, China [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(8): 3393–3401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0892-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LU Cai-ping, LIU Guang-jian, LIU Yang, et al. Microseismic multi-parameter characteristics of rockburst hazard induced by hard roof fall and high stress concentration [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 76: 18–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. CAI Wu, DOU Lin-ming, ZHANG Min, et al. A fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methodology for rock burst forecasting using microseismic monitoring [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 80: 232–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. LI Zhen-lei, HE Xue-qiu, DOU Lin-ming, et al. Investigating the mechanism and prevention of coal mine dynamic disasters by using dynamic cyclic loading tests [J]. Safety Science, 2019, 115: 215–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CHEN Shao-jie, ZHAO Zeng-hui, FENG Fan, et al, Stress evolution of deep surrounding rock under characteristics of bi-modulus and strength drop [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2022, 29(2): 680–692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-022-4945-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CHEN Chao-mei, CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ZHANG Cheng-guo, CANBULAT I, HEBBLEWHITE B, et al. Assessing coal burst phenomena in mining and insights into directions for future research [J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017, 179: 28–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2017.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WANG Chang-bin, CAO An-ye, ZHANG Cheng-guo, et al, A new method to assess coal burst risks using dynamic and static loading analysis [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(3): 1113–1128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01968-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. LI Zhen-lei, DOU Lin-ming, WANG Gui-feng, et al, Risk evaluation of rock burst through theory of static and dynamic stresses superposition [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(2): 676–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-015-2570-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ZHOU Xu-ming, WANG Sheng, LI Xue-long, et al. Research on theory and technology of floor heave control in semicoal rock roadway: Taking Longhu coal mine in Qitaihe mining area as an example [J]. Lithosphere, 2022(Special 11): 3810988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2113/2022/3810988.

  15. ZHOU Jian, CHEN Chao, WEI Cong, et al, An improved connection cloud model of an updated database: A multicriteria uncertainty model for coal burst liability evaluation [J]. Natural Resources Research, 2022, 31(3): 1687–1704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-022-10042-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. CAI Wu, DOU Lin-ming, SI Guang-yao, et al. A principal component analysis/fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for coal burst liability assessment [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2016, 81: 62–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WANG Chao, SONG Da-zhao, ZHANG Cheng-liang, et al, Research on the classification model of coal’s bursting liability based on database with large samples [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12(13): 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4562-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LIU Yi-liu. Safety barriers: Research advances and new thoughts on theory, engineering and management [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 67: 104260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. LI Xue-long, CHEN Shao-jie, LIU Shu-min, et al, AE waveform characteristics of rock mass under uniaxial loading based on Hilbert-Huang transform [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2021, 28(6): 1843–1856. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-021-4734-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ZHOU Jian, LI Xi-bing, SHI Xiu-zhi, Long-term prediction model of rockburst in underground openings using heuristic algorithms and support vector machines [J]. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4): 629–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ZHOU Jian, LI Xi-bing, MITRI H S. Classification of rockburst in underground projects: Comparison of ten supervised learning methods [J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2016, 30(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000553.

  22. FARHADIAN H, A new empirical chart for rockburst analysis in tunnelling: Tunnel rockburst classification (TRC) [J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2021, 31(4): 603–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.03.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LIU Shu-min, LI Xue-long, WANG Deng-ke, et al. Investigations on the mechanism of the microstructural evolution of different coal ranks under liquid nitrogen cold soaking [J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2020: 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1841856.

  24. LI Xue-long, CHEN Shao-jie, WANG Sheng, et al. Study on in situ stress distribution law of the deep mine: Taking Linyi mining area as an example [J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 2021: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5594181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. LIU Hong-yang, ZHANG Bo-yang, LI Xue-long, et al. Research on roof damage mechanism and control technology of gob-side entry retaining under close distance gob [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 138: 106331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. GONG Feng-qiang, HE Zhi-chao, SI Xue-feng, Experimental study on revealing the mechanism of rockburst prevention by drilling pressure relief: Status-of-the-art and prospects [J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2022, 13(1): 2442–2470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2121227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. HE Zhi-chao, GONG Feng-qiang, LUO Song, Evaluation of the rockburst proneness of red sandstone with prefabricated boreholes: An experimental study from the energy storage perspective [J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2021, 12(1): 2117–2154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1955754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. YIN Tu-bing, YANG Zheng, WU You, et al, Experimental investigation on the effect of open fire on the tensile properties and damage evolution behavior of granite [J]. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2022, 31(8): 1139–1164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10567895221092168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. GB/T 25217.2—2010. Classification and laboratory test method on bursting liability of coal [S]. (in Chinese)

  30. WAKEFIELD J. Statistical analysis of environmental spacetime processes edited by N. D. le and J. V. zidek [J]. Biometrics, 2007, 63: 624–625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1541-0420.2006.00787_1.X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. MATHERON G, Principles of geostatistics [J]. Economic Geology, 1963, 58(8): 1246–1266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. JALALI M, KARAMI S, MARJ A F, Geostatistical evaluation of spatial variation related to groundwater quality database: Case study for Arak Plain aquifer, Iran [J]. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2016, 21(6): 707–719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-016-9506-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. FARHADIAN H, NIKVAR-HASSANI A, Development of a new empirical method for tunnel squeezing classification (TSC) [J]. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 2020, 53(4): 655–660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2019-108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. ZHANG Xu-yan, FENG Guo-rui, KANG Li-xun, et al, Method to determine burst tendency of coal rock by residual energy emission speed [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(9): 1165–1168. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. LI Gang-feng. Study on rockburst risk zone division and control technology in Pingdingshan coal industry group No.4 coal mine [D]. Jiaozuo: Henan Polytechnic University, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. WANG Hong-wei, JIANG Yao-dong, DENG Dai-xin, et al, Investigation on the inducing factors of coal bursts under complicated geological environment in Yima mining area [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(S2): 4085–4092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2017.0463. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  37. ZHANG Wan-peng, WANG Pei-lu, LIAN Jie, et al, Extra-thick coal seam area pressure bump hazard analysis in Yima Coalfield [J]. Coal Geology of China, 2017, 29(1): 53–56. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. JIA Yan-wu, Study on index weighting coefficients of bump tendency and bump hazard of coal body [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2015, 46(4): 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  39. GUAN Wei. The risk assessment and prevention of rock burst in the No. 9 district of No. 2 Jining Coal Mine [D]. Fuxin: Liaoning Technical University, 2014. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  40. TANG Zhi, PAN Yi-shan, LI Zhong-hua, et al, Experiment and numerical simulation of coal burst tendency [J]. World Sci-Tech R&D, 2012, 34(5): 772–774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16507/j.issn.1006-6055.2012.05.021. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  41. TIAN Shao-fei. The risk assessment and prediction-prevention of rockburst in Pengzhuang Mine [D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2011. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  42. SUN Quan-jin, Test research of burst tendency in longjiapu 2# coal seam [J]. Shanxi Coking Coal Science & Technology, 2010, 34(3): 23–26. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  43. GUO Dong-ming, ZHANG Tao, LI Yao, et al, Research on rockburst tendency and its preventive measures of 800 m deep surrounding-rock in Huxi Coal Mine [J]. China Mining Magazine, 2008, 17(12): 50–52, 63. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  44. BAI Han-ying, WANG Dang-liang, LI Wen-ping, Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in evaluation of coal seam impact tendency [J]. Energy Technology and Management, 2006, 31(1): 21–22. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  45. ZHI Guang-hui, HUANG Chun-guang. Experimental study on the impact propensity of coal rock in Yuejin Coal Mine [J]. Coal Engineering, 2009, 11: 76–78. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  46. ZHANG Xu-yan. Study on the feature of rock burst and the burtsting liability in bureau of da Tong [D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2006. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

    Chao Chen  (陈超) & Jian Zhou  (周健)

Authors
  1. Chao Chen  (陈超)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Zhou  (周健)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Zhou  (周健).

Additional information

Contributors

CHEN Chao collected the data, established the spatial interpolation model, and wrote the draft of the manuscript. ZHOU Jian wrote and reviewed the manuscript, participated in constructing the classification model.

Conflict of interest

CHEN Chao and ZHOU Jian declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Foundation item

Projects(42177164, 72088101, 41807259) supported by the National Science Foundation of China; Project (2022JJ10073) supported by the Distinguished Youth Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China; Project (202206370030) supported by the China Scholarship Council

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Zhou, J. A new empirical chart for coal burst liability classification using Kriging method. J. Cent. South Univ. 30, 1205–1216 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5294-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-023-5294-8

Key words

关键词

Search

Navigation