Abstract
In order to evaluate the intensity of the coal’s bursting liability scientifically and accurately, the index relevance problems existing in the current classification methods were focused on, and the Mahalanobis distance discriminant analysis (DDA) method was introduced on the basis of establishing a measured database with the large sample of the coal’s bursting liability. Besides, the DDA model of coal’s bursting liability classification was also established. Then, with the duration of dynamic fracture, elastic strain energy index, bursting energy index, and uniaxial compressive strength selected as evaluation indicators, three grade-discrimination functions of the bursting liability were established through training the data of 95 groups of bursting liability of different coal seams that were collected extensively. After training, the accuracy rate of the DDA model reached 96%. The results of the application of DDA model to the classification of coal samples from 10 coal mines exhibited remarkable agreement with the actual situation, which also solved the difficult problem that the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method could not distinguish 8 kinds of samples. Its application to the engineering project shows that the classification result of coal’s bursting liability based on the DDA method is both accurate and easy to calculate, and the DDA model has good engineering application prospect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bieniawski ZT, Denkhaus HG, Vogler UW (1969) Failure of fracture rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:323–341
Gong FQ, Lu JT (2014) Recognition method of mine water inrush sources based on the principal element analysis and distance discrimination analysis. J Min Saf Eng 31:236–242 (in Chinese)
Guo JD (2017) Application of variable weight and grey classification recognition model in rock burst tendency evaluation of coal seam. J Nor China Insti Sci Technol 14:44–49 (in Chinese)
He H, Dou LM, Cao AY et al (2015) Mechanisms of mining seismicity under large scale exploitation with multikey strata. Shock Vib 22:1–9
Horyl P, Snuparek R (2012) Reinforcing measures of steel roadway support in rockburst prone areas. Arch Min Sci 57:193–208
Hucka V, Das B (1974) Brittleness determination of rock masses by different methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Abstr 11:389–392
Jia XW, Wang EY (2014) Coal burst tendency classification based on attribute mathematical model. In: Safety in coal mines, vol 45, pp 156–162 (in Chinese)
Kidybinski A (1981) Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Abstr 18:295–304
Li PB, Wang JA (2016) Application of principal component analysis in coal rockburst tendency in judgment. Coal Technol 35:19–21 (in Chinese)
Li XL, Wang EY, Li ZH, Liu Z, Song D, Qiu L (2016) Rock burst monitoring by integrated microseismic and electromagnetic radiation methods. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4393–4406
Li XL, Li ZH, Wang EY et al (2018) Pattern recognition of mine microseismic (MS) and blasting events based on wave fractal features. Fractals 26:1–18
Liu XF, Wang EY (2018) Study on characteristics of EMR signals induced from fracture of rock samples and their application in rockburst prediction in copper mine. J Geophys Eng 15:909–220
Liu XF, Wang XR, Wang EY, Kong X, Zhang C, Liu S, Zhao E (2017) Effects of gas pressure on bursting liability of coal under uniaxial conditions. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 39:90–100
Liu J, Zhang R, Song DZ, Wang Z (2019) Experimental investigation on occurrence of gassy coal extrusion in coalmine. Saf Sci 113:362–371
Qi QX, Peng YW, Li HY et al (2011) Study of bursting liability of coal and rock. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 35:2736–2742 (in Chinese)
Singh SP (1988) Burst energy release index. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:149–155
Song DZ, Wang EY, Qiu LM et al (2018) Response of coal rock apparent resistivity to hydraulic fracturing process. Geomech Eng 14:581–588
Su CD, Gao BB, Yuan RF et al (2014) Outburst-proneness index and their correlation analysis of coal seams in Pingdingshan mine area. J China Coal Soc 39:8–14 (in Chinese)
Sun XM, Xu HC, He MC et al (2017) Experimental investigation of the occurrence of rockburst in a rock specimen through infrared thermography and acoustic emission. J Rcok Mech Min 93:250–259
Wang C (2011) Research of rockburst risk comprehensive evaluation method based on unascertained measurement model and application. Dissertation. In: China University of mining and technology. Xuzhou, China (in Chinese)
Wang JA, Park HD (2001) Comprehensive prediction of rockburst based on analysis of strain energy in rocks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 16:49–57
Wang SK, Zhang WB, Wu YK (1992) Research on the fuzzy comprehensive judgment of the outburst liability of coal seam. Gro Pres Stra Contr 9:75–79 (in Chinese)
Xu JK, Wang EY, Wang C (2011) Study of rock burst tendency of coal based on uncertainty measurement theory. Saf Coal Min 42:19–22 (in Chinese)
Zhang WQ, Wang EY, Liu L et al (2016) Evaluation of rock burst tendency of coal seam based on hamming distance method. Indus Mine Auto 42:7–11 (in Chinese)
Funding
This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51864023, 11862010), Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Yunnan Province, College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program of Yunnan Province (201810672016), the Analysis & Testing Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology (2017T20130130). The authors would like to express thanks to these foundations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mine Safety Science and Engineering
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, C., Song, D., Zhang, C. et al. Research on the classification model of coal’s bursting liability based on database with large samples. Arab J Geosci 12, 411 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4562-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4562-2