Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in leaf functional traits between exotic and native Compositae plant species

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in leaf functional traits and phenotypic plasticity of leaf functional traits between exotic and native Compositae plant species. Leaf width of exotic plants was significantly lower than that of native species. Leaf length, specific leaf area (SLA), single-leaf wet and dry weights, leaf moisture, and leaf thickness of exotic plants were also lower than those of native species but not significantly. The leaf shape index of exotic plants was higher than that of native species but not significantly. This implies that the relatively low leaf construction cost for exotic plants may play an important role in the success of their invasions. The higher leaf shape index and lower leaf width of exotic plants can enhance the efficiency of resource capture (especially sunlight capture) via adjustments to leaf shape and size, thereby increasing the survival of exotic plants. The plasticity indices of single-leaf wet weight and leaf thickness of exotic plants were significantly lower than those of native species. The lower phenotypic plasticity of single-leaf wet weight and leaf thickness of exotic plants may be the result of a cost to plasticity. That is, if the plasticity is too high, the fitness of plant species might be reduced sharply under unfavorable environments. Thus, lower plasticity of leaf functional traits may compensate for the negative impact of adverse environments and stabilize leaf construction costs for exotic plants. Moreover, reduced phenotypic plasticity might be one of the key competitive strategies by which exotic plants successfully invade new habitats. Overall, exotic plants did not always exhibit higher values of leaf functional traits or increased phenotypic plasticity of leaf functional traits compared with native species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. VILE D, GARNIER E, SHIPLEY B, LAURENT G, NAVAS M L, ROUMET C, LAVOREL S, DÍAZ S, HODGSON J G, LLORET F, MIDGLEY G F, POORTER H, RUTHERFORD M C, WILSON P J, WRIGHT I J. Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves [J]. Annals of Botany, 2005, 96: 1129-1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. LIU F D, YANG W J, WANG Z S, XU Z, LIU H, ZHANG M, LIU Y H, AN S Q, SUN S C. Plant size effects on the relationships among specific leaf area, leaf nutrient content, and photosynthetic capacity in tropical woody species [J]. Acta Oecologica-International Journal of Ecology, 2010, 36: 149-159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MENG F Q, CAO R, YANG D M, NIKLAS K J, SUN S C. Trade-offs between light interception and leaf water shedding: A comparison of shade- and sun-adapted species in a subtropical rainforest [J]. Oecologia, 2014, 174: 13-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. POORTER H, NIINEMETS U, POORTER L, WRIGHT I J, VILLAR R. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta-analysis [J]. New Phytologist, 2009, 182: 565-588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. XIAO H G, WANG C Y, LIU J, WANG L, DU D L. Insights into the differences in leaf functional traits of heterophyllous Syringa oblata under different light intensities [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2015, 26: 613-621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. WANG C Y, LIU J, XIAO H G, Du D L. Response of leaf functional traits of Cerasus yedoensis (Mats.) Yü li to serious insect attack [J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2016, 25: 333-339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. WANG C Y, XIAO H G, LIU J, ZHOU J W, DU D L. Insights into the effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on leaf functional traits of Rhus typhina [J]. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2016, 25: 1279-1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. HUANG Q Q, SHEN Y D, LI X X, LI S L, FAN Z W. Invasive Eupatorium catarium and Ageratum conyzoides benefit more than does a common native plant from nutrient addition in both competitive and non-competitive environments [J]. Ecological Research, 2016, 31: 145-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SCHEEPENS J F, FREI E S, STÖCKLIN J. Genotypic and environmental variation in specific leaf area in a widespread Alpine plant after transplantation to different altitudes [J]. Oecologia, 2010, 164: 141-150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. PIETSCH K A, OGLE K, CORNELISSEN J H C, CORNWELL W K, BÖNISCH G, CRAINE J M, JACKSON B G, KATTGE J, PELTZER D A, PENUELAS J, REICH P B, WARDLE D A, WEEDON J T, WRIGHT I J, ZANNE A E, WIRTH C. Global relationship of wood and leaf litter decomposability: The role of functional traits within and across plant organs [J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23: 1046-1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. POWELL K I, CHASE J M, KNIGHT T M. Invasive plants have scale-dependent effects on diversity by altering species-area relationships [J]. Science, 2013, 339: 316-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WANG C Y, XIAO H G, WANG L, LIU J, DU D L. Insights into ecological effects of invasive plants on soil nitrogen cycling [J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2015, 6: 34-46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. WANG C Y, XIAO H G, ZHAO L L, LIU J, WANG L, ZHANG F, SHI Y C, DU D L. The allelopathic effects of invasive plant Solidago canadensis on seed germination and growth of Lactuca sativa enhanced by different types of acid deposition [J]. Ecotoxicology, 2016, 25: 555-562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. VAN KLEUNEN M, WEBER E, FISCHER M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species [J]. Ecology Letters, 2010, 13: 235-245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CHEN L Y, TIU C J, PENG S L, SIEMANN E. Conspecific plasticity and invasion: invasive populations of Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera) have performance advantage over native populations only in low soil salinity [J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e74961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. SHEPPARD C S, BURNS B R. Effects of interspecific alien versus intraspecific native competition on growth of native woody plants [J]. Plant Ecology, 2014, 215: 1527-1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. TE BEEST M, ESLER K J, RICHARDSON D M. Linking functional traits to impacts of invasive plant species: A case study [J]. Plant Ecology, 2015, 216: 293-305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. GAO X M, ZHAO Y J, YANG X J, SUN S C. Linking trait differences to community dynamics: Evidence from Eupatorium adenophorum and co-occurring native species during a three-year succession [J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e50247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. YAN X L, LIU Q R, SHOU H Y, ZENG X F, ZHANG Y, CHEN L, LIU Y, MA H Y, QI S Y, MA J S. The categorization and analysis on the geographic distribution patterns of Chinese alien invasive plants [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2014, 22(5): 667-676. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. WANG C Y, LIU J, XIAO H G, ZHOU J W, DU D L. Floristic characteristics of alien invasive seed plant species in China [J]. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 2016, 88(3): 1791-1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. GLEASON S M, ARES A. Photosynthesis, carbohydrate storage and survival of a native and an introduced tree species in relation to light and defoliation [J]. Tree Physiology, 2004, 24: 1087-1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. LEISHMAN M R, HASLEHURST T, ARES A, BARUCH Z. Leaf trait relationships of native and invasive plants: community- and global-scale comparisons [J]. New Phytologist, 2007, 176: 635-643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. HULME P. Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasions: is it all Jack? [J] Functional Ecology, 2008, 22: 3-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. JEONG N, MOON J K, KIM H S, KIM C G, JEONG S C. Fine genetic mapping of the genomic region controlling leaflet shape and number of seeds per pod in the soybean [J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 122: 865-874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. WANG Z, ZHANG L. Leaf shape alters the coefficients of leaf area estimation models for Saussurea stoliczkai in central Tibet [J]. Photosynthetica, 2012, 50: 337-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. KARDEL F, WUYTS K, BABANEZHAD M, VITHARANA U W A, WUYTACK T, POTTERS G, SAMSON R. Assessing urban habitat quality based on specific leaf area and stomatal characteristics of Plantago lanceolata L. [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2010, 158: 788-794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. LAMARQUE L J, LORTIE C J, PORTÉ A J, DELZON S. Genetic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits between native and introduced populations of invasive maple trees [J]. Biological Invasions, 2015, 17: 1109-1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. LAMARQUE L J, PORTÉ A J, EYMERIC C, LASNIER J B, LORTIE C J, DELZON S. A test for pre-adapted phenotypic plasticity in the invasive tree Acer negundo L. [J]. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8: e74239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. GROTKOPP E, ERSKINE-OGDEN J, REJMÁNEK M. Assessing potential invasiveness of woody horticultural plant species using seedling growth rate traits [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 47: 1320-1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. WANG C Y, ZHOU J W, XIAO H G, LIU J, WANG L. Variations in leaf functional traits among plant species grouped by growth and leaf types in Zhenjiang, China [J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2017, 28(2): 241-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ORDONEZ A. Global meta-analysis of trait consistency of non-native plants between their native and introduced areas [J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2014, 23: 264-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. FAN S F, LIU C H, YU D, XIE D. Differences in leaf nitrogen content, photosynthesis, and resource-use efficiency between Eichhornia crassipes and a native plant Monochoria vaginalis in response to altered sediment nutrient levels [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2013, 711: 129-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. GENG X Y, JIANG S, LI B, PAN X Y. Do higher resource capture ability and utilization efficiency facilitate the successful invasion of exotic plant? A case study of Alternanthera philoxeroides [J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2013, 4: 1839-1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. TIAN D S, PAN Q M, SIMMONS M, CHAOLU H, DU B H, BAI Y F, WANG H, HAN X G. Hierarchical reproductive allocation and allometry within a perennial bunchgrass after 11 years of nutrient addition [J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e42833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. SHIPLEY B. Trade-offs between net assimilation rate and specific leaf area in determining relative growth rate: relationship with daily irradiance [J]. Functional Ecology, 2002, 16: 682-689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. POSSEN B J H M, ANTTONEN M J, OKSANEN E, ROUSI M, HEINONEN J, KOSTIAINEN K, KONTUNEN-SOPPELA S, HEISKANEN J, VAPAAVUORI E M. Variation in 13 leaf morphological and physiological traits within a silver birch (Betula pendula) stand and their relation to growth [J]. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 44: 657-665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. LEBEL P, BRADLEY R L, THIFFAULT N. The relative importance of nitrogen vs. moisture stress may drive intraspecific variations in the SLA-RGR relationship: The case of Picea mariana seedlings [J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2013, 4: 1278-1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. IIDA Y, KOHYAMA T S, SWENSON N G, SU S H, CHEN C T, CHIANG J M, SUN I F. Linking functional traits and demographic rates in a subtropical tree community: the importance of size dependency [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2014, 102: 641-650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. NAGEL J M, GRIFFIN K L. Construction cost and invasive potential: comparing Lythrum salcaria (Lythraceae) with co-occurring native species along pond banks [J]. American Journal of Botany, 2001, 88: 2252-2258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. SONG L Y, NI G Y, CHEN B M, PENG S L. Energetic cost of leaf construction in the invasive weed Mikania micrantha HBK and its co-occurring species: Implications for invasiveness [J]. Botanical Studies, 2007, 48: 331-338.

    Google Scholar 

  41. HOU Q Q, CHEN B M, PENG S L, CHEN L Y. Effects of extreme temperature on seedling establishment of nonnative invasive plants [J]. Biological Invasions, 2014, 16: 2049-2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. MCINTYRE P J, STRAUSS S Y. Phenotypic and transgenerational plasticity promote local adaptation to sun and shade environments [J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 28: 229-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. ASHTON I W, MILLER A E, BOWMAN W D, SUDING K N. Niche complementarity due to plasticity in resource use: Plant partitioning of chemical N forms [J]. Ecology, 2010, 91: 3252-3260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. ZUPPINGER-DINGLEY D, SCHMID B, PETERMANN J S, YADAV V, DE DEYN G B, FLYNN D F. Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects [J]. Nature, 2014, 515: 108-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. MARON J L, ELMENDORF S C, VILÀ M. Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate in the native and introduced range of Hypericum perforatum [J]. Evolution, 2007, 61: 1912-1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. QUAN G M, MAO D J, ZHANG J E, XIE J F, XU H Q, AN M. Response of invasive Chromolaena odorata and two coexisting weeds to contrasting irradiance and nitrogen [J]. Photosynthetica, 2015, 53: 419-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. PALACIO-LÓAEZ K, GIANOLI E. Invasive plants do not display greater phenotypic plasticity than their native or non-invasive counterparts: a meta-analysis [J]. Oikos, 2011, 120: 1393-1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. MATZEK V. Trait values, not trait plasticity, best explain invasive species performance in a changing environment [J]. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7: e48821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. WILLIAMS J L, AUGE H, MARON J L. Different gardens, different results: Native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardens [J]. Oecologia, 2008, 157: 239-248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong-yan Wang  (王从彦).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(31300343) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(Y20160023) supported by Open Science Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Project supported by Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Technology and Material of Water Treatment, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Cy., Liu, J., Zhou, Jw. et al. Differences in leaf functional traits between exotic and native Compositae plant species. J. Cent. South Univ. 24, 2468–2474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3658-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-017-3658-7

Key words

Navigation