Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-objective optimization for leaching process using improved two-stage guide PSO algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mathematical mechanism model was proposed for the description and analysis of the heat-stirring-acid leaching process. The model is proved to be effective by experiment. Afterwards, the leaching problem was formulated as a constrained multi-objective optimization problem based on the mechanism model. A two-stage guide multi-objective particle swarm optimization (TSG-MOPSO) algorithm was proposed to solve this optimization problem, which can accelerate the convergence and guarantee the diversity of pareto-optimal front set as well. Computational experiment was conducted to compare the solution by the proposed algorithm with SIGMA-MOPSO by solving the model and with the manual solution in practice. The results indicate that the proposed algorithm shows better performance than SIGMA-MOPSO, and can improve the current manual solutions significantly. The improvements of production time and economic benefit compared with manual solutions are 10.5% and 7.3%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. VEGLIO F, TRIFONI M, TORO L. Leaching of manganiferous ores by glucose in a sulfuric acid solution: Kinetic modeling and related statistical analysis [J]. American Chemical Society, 2001, 40(18): 3895–3901.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CRUNDWELL F K. Modeling, simulation, and optimization of bacterial leaching reactors [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2000, 71(4): 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. MA Z, EK C. Rate processes and mathematical modelling of the acid leaching of a manganese carbonate ore [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 1991, 27(2): 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CRUNDWELL F K. Progress in the mathematical modelling of leaching reactors [J]. Hydrometallurgy, 1995, 39(1/2/3): 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. BREED A W, HANSFORD G S. Modeling continuous bioleach reactors [J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 1999, 64(6): 671–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. LEVENSPIEL O. Chemical reactions engineering [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972: 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CHEUNG N, GARCIA A. The use of a heuristic search technique for the optimization of quality of steel billets produced by continuous casting [J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2001, 14(2): 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. YANG Zhen-shan, SHAO Cheng, LI Gui-zhi. Multi-objective optimization for EGCS using improved PSO algorithm [C]// Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference. New York: American Control Conference, 2007: 5059–5063.

  9. LOTOV A V, KAMENEV G K, BEREZKIN V E. Optimal control of cooling process in continuous casting of steel using a visualization-based multi-criteria approach [J]. Applied Mathmatical Modeling, 2005, 29(7): 653–672.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. Swarm intelligence [M]. Morgan: Kaufmann, 2001: 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. POLI R, KENNEDY J, BLACKWELL T. Particle swarm optimization an overview [J]. Swarm Intelligence, 2007, 1(1): 33–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. SIERRA M R, COELLO COELLO C A. Multi-objective particle swarm optimizers: A survey of the state-of-the-art [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research, 2006, 2(3): 287–308.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. MOSTAGHIM S, TEICH J. Strategies for finding good local guides in multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) [C]// Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium. Indianapolis: IEEE, 2003: 26–33.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. COELLO C A, LECHUGA M S. Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, 8(3): 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ZHANG Shou-xiang, ZHENG Ya-jie. Study on leaching kinetics of pyrite cinder [J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2006, 34(11): 36–39. (in Chinese)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. TONG Zhi-fang, BI Shi-wen, LI Hui-li, YANG Yi-Hong. Leaching kinetics of calcium aluminate slag [J]. The Chinese Journal of Process Engineering, 2005, 5(4): 399–402. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. LI Hong-gui. Hydrometallurgy [M]. Changsha: Central South University Press, 1998: 42–56. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. PARKER R H. An introduction to chemical metallurgy [M]. Oxford: Pergamon Press Ltd, 1978: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MOORE J J. Chemical metallurgy [M]. London: Butterworths Press, 1981: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  20. KENNEDY J. The behavior of particles [M]. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Press, 1998: 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, MEYARIVAN T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guang-hao Hu  (胡广浩).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(2006AA060201) supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, Gh., Mao, Zz. & He, Dk. Multi-objective optimization for leaching process using improved two-stage guide PSO algorithm. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 18, 1200–1210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0823-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-011-0823-2

Key words

Navigation