Skip to main content
Log in

Spatio-temporal characteristics of disturbance of land use change on major ecosystem function zones in China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, because of increasing human activities, ecosystems have been substantially disturbed and their service functions have been greatly compromised. Based on the effect of land use changes on the major ecosystem services, we estimated the ecosystem comprehensive anthropogenic disturbance index (ECADI) and analyzed the spatio-temporal characteristics of changes in the ECADI in China from 1990 to 2010. The average ECADI of the major ecosystem function zones in China in 2010 is approximately 0.382. The ECADI of Northeast China and North China is slightly higher than that of Northwest China and Southwest China. Most zones have slight changes in the ECADI. The average increases of ECADI in the major ecosystem function zones in China from 1990 to 2000 and from 2000 to 2010 are 0.0024 and 0.0002, respectively. The increase is mainly due to reclamation and urbanization, whereas the decrease is due to the implementation of ecosystem protection policies. During the last 20 years, the ECADI of water resources conservation zones increased first, and then stopped. The ECADI of soil conservation zones increased first, and then declined. The ECADI of sandstorm prevention zones, biodiversity conservation zones and flooding mitigation zones increased continuously. Our results may provide proposals to the government regarding land use planning and ecosystem protection plans in the major ecosystem zones. The major ecosystem function zones in the western part of China have been protected effectively. However, the major ecosystem function zones in the eastern part of China require more protection in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basnou C, Alvarez E, Bagaria G et al., 2013. Spatial patterns of land use changes across a Mediterranean metropolitan landscape: implications for biodiversity management. Environmental Management, 52(4): 971–980. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0150-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battin J, Wiley M W, Ruckelshaus M H et al., 2007. Projected impacts of clmate change on salmon habitat restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 104(16): 6720–6725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701685104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Liding, Fu Bojie, 2000. Ecological signif icance, characteristics and types of disturbance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 20(4): 581–586. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Xiaoyan, Liang Zongsuo, Du Feng et al., 2007. The effect of disturbance on the structure and form of three typical communities in Loess hilly region of the northern of Shanxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(7): 3061–3071. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, 1997. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington D. C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, Matson P A, 2008. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. PNAS, 105(28): 9455–9456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804960105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G C, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al., 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(1): 21–28. doi: 10.1890/080025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Z, Shen Y, Wang J et al., 2009. Land-use change and its ecological responses: a pilot study of typical agro-pastoral region in the Heihe River, Northwest China. Environmental Geology, 58(7): 1549–1556. doi: 10.1007/s00254-008-1656-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P R, Kareiva P M, Daily G C, 2012. Securing natural capital and expanding equity to rescale civilization. Nature, 486: 68–73. doi: 10.1038/nature11157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farina A, 1998. Principles and Method in Landscape Ecology. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T et al., 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5): 437–440. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, Ouyang Zhiyun, 2013. Ecological Regionalization in China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gascoigne W R, Hoag D, Koontz L et al., 2011. Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA. Ecological Economics, 70(10): 1715–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs R J, Huenneke L F, 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology, 6(3): 324–337. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030324.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Haiqing, Wei Shujing, Sun Long et al., 2013. Interaction among climate change, fire disturbance and ecosystem carbon cycle. Arid Land Geography, 36(1): 57–75. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee Hannah, David Lohse, Charles Hutchinson et al., 1994. A Preliminary Inventory of Human Disturbance of World Ecosystems. Ambio, 23(4–5): 246–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, 2012. Rural Household Livelihoods and Environmental Sustainability in the West of China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Feldman M, Li S et al., 2011. Rural household income and inequality under the Sloping Land Conversion Program in western China. PNAS, 108(19): 7721–7726. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101018108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Li W, Qian Z, 2010. Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecological Economics, 69(7): 1427–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Yanmei, Niu Dong, Zhang Zhiqiang et al., 2009. Review of international scientific programmes and frontiers of biodiversity research. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(4): 2115–2123. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Yifeng, Luo Yuechu, Liu Gang et al., 2013. Effects of land use change on ecosystem services, a case study in Miyun reservoir watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3): 726–736. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Li S, Ouyang Z Y et al., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. PNAS, 105(28): 9477–9482. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706436105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Jiyuan, 1992. Land Use in the Tibet Autonomous Region. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Jiyuan, Zhang Zengxiang, Xu Xinliang et al., 2010. Spatial patterns and driving forces of land use change in China during the early 21st century. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(4): 483–494. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0483-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Aifeng, Tian Hanqin, 2007. Interaction among climatic change, fire disturbance and ecosystem productivity. Journal of Plant Ecology, 31(2): 242–251. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington D. C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (MEPC), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 2008. National Ecosystem Function Regionalization. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H A, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, 2013. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. PNAS, 110(supp. 1): 3665–3672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107484110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson E, Sander H, Hawthorne P et al., 2010. Projecting global land-use change and its effect on ecosystem service provision and biodiversity with simple models. PLoS ONE, 5(12): e14327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Rusong, Zhao Jingzhu, 1999. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 10(5): 635–640. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang Zhiyun, Zheng Hua, Huang Baorong et al., 2009. Regional Ecological Assessment and Ecosystem Service Zoning. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D et al., 2011. The Impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environmental & Resource Economics, 48(2): 219–242. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Segerson K, 2009. Integrating ecology and economics in the study of ecosystem services: some lessons learned. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1: 409–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.resource.050708.144110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam R D, Fisher B, Mbilinyi B P et al., 2011. Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3): 563–574. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian H Q, Chen G, Zhang C et al., 2012. Century-scale response of ecosystem carbon storage to multifactorial global change in the southern United States. Ecosystems, 15: 674–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardrop D H, Glasmeier A K, Peterson-Smith J et al., 2011. Wetland ecosystem services and coupled socioeconomic benefits through conservation practices in the Appalachian Region. Ecological Applications, 21(3): S93–S115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H G, Tang X P, Liu J Y et al., 2009. China's progress toward the significant reduction of the rate of biodiversity loss. Bio-Science, 59(10): 843–852. doi: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Zengxiang, Zhao Xiaoli, Wang Xiao, 2012. Land Use Remote Sensing Monitoring in China. Beijing: Star Map Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Guosong, Liu Jiyuan, Kuang Wenhui et al., 2014. Disturbance impacts of land use change on biodiversity conservation priority areas across China during 1990–2010. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(11): 1640–1650. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Shidong, Zhang Yongmin, 2006. Ecosystems and human well-being: the achievements, contributions and prospects of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Advances in Earth Science, 21(9): 865–872. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Ling, Shangguan Tieliang, Guo Donggang et al., 2012. Response of species diversity in Caragana Korshinskii communities to climate factors and grazing disturbance in Shanxi, Shaanxi, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(1): 111–122. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiyuan Liu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2014CB954302), National Science and Technology Support Plan Project of China (No. 2013BAC03B04)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, J., Liu, J. & Zhao, G. Spatio-temporal characteristics of disturbance of land use change on major ecosystem function zones in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25, 523–536 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-015-0776-8

Keywords

Navigation