Skip to main content
Log in

Deinking of water-based ink printing from plastic film using nonionic surfactants

  • Published:
Journal of Surfactants and Detergents

Abstract

When plastic film packaging is processed for reuse, residual ink colors the polymer and makes the polymer less stiff, weaker, and denser than the original material. These problems can be avoided if the printing is removed from the plastic film surface. In this study, a commercial polyethylene film with water-based ink printing was deinked (the ink was removed) using nonionic surfactants under a variety of conditions, and the effect of some parameters related to the deinking process were quantified and optimized. Nonylphenol polyethoxylate, ethoxylated alcohol at a pH of 10, and ethoxylated amine at either acidic, neutral, or basic pH level were identified to be effective at deinking. The hydrophiliclipophilic balance (HLB) value and the cloud point are useful parameters for characterizing the effectiveness of nonionic surfactants. For optimal deinking, the HLB of the nonionic surfactants should be as small as possible or the cloud point as low as possible without the deinking temperature substantially exceeding the cloud point. Information related to scaleup of the process was also developed. Soaking plastic film in surfactant solution prior to mechanical agitation significantly decreased the needed agitation time to achieve a given level of deinking. Deinking decreases as the plastic/solution ratio (consistency) increases, and cutting plastic film into smaller pieces improves the deinking at moderate consistency. Increasing agitation speed also enhances the deinking. Experiments performed with pilot-sized paper deinking apparatuses demonstrated that deinking of plastic film using surfactants is technically feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AEOx :

ethoxylated alcohol

AMEOx+y :

ethoxylated amine

CMC:

critical micelle concentration

DE* :

total color difference

DSC:

differential scanning calorimetry

EO:

ethylene oxide

HDPE:

high-density polyethylene

HLB:

hydrophilic-lipophilic balance

LDPE:

low-density polyethylene

NPEO10 :

nonylphenol polyethoxylate

TEM:

transmission electron microscope

References

  1. Rader, C.P., and R.F. Stockel, Polymer Recycling: An Overview, in Plastic, Rubber and Paper Recycling, edited by C.P. Rader, S.D Balwin, D.D. Cornell, G.D. Sadler, and R.F. Stockel, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, Washington, DC, Vol. 609, 1995, p. 2.

  2. Stein, R.S., Polymer Recycling: Thermodynamics and Economics, in Plastic, Rubber and Paper Recycling, edited by C.P. Rader, S.D Balwin, D.D. Cornell, G.D. Sadler, and R.F. Stockel, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, Washington, DC, Vol. 609, 1995, p. 27.

  3. Schnuck, T., Why Recyclable Plastic Bags Make Sense, The Environment 12:59 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saba, R.G., and W.E. Rearson, Curbside Recycling Infrastructure: A Pragmatic Approach, in Plastic, Rubber and Paper Recycling, edited by C.P. Rader, S.D Balwin, D.D. Cornell, G.D. Sadler, and R.F. Stockel, American Chemical Society Symposium Series, Washington, DC, Vol. 609, 1995, p. 11.

  5. News, Plastic-Film Market to Grow 3.1% a Year, Packaging 39:13 (1994).

  6. Gecol, H., J.F. Scamehorn, S.D. Christian, B.P. Grady, and F.E. Riddell, Use of Surfactants to Remove Inks from Plastic Films, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 189:55 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanford, J., D. Climenhage, and I. Bateman, Residential Plastic Film Recycling, Resource Recycling 11:12 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vandenberg, N., Plastic Film Recycling, BiCyde 32:67 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell, P.E., Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook: Plastic Part Manufacturing, 4th edn., Vol. 8, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1996, pp. 2.9, 3.7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirschner, E.M., Recycling's Rough Adolescence, C&EN 74 (Nov. 4):19 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerstenberg, K.W., Corona Treatment for Film Printing, Int. Polym. Sci. Technol. 21:13 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chabot, B., C. Daneault, M. Lapointe, and L. Marchildon, Newsprint Water-Based Inks and Flotation Deinking, Progr. Paper Recycling 8:21 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Case Study: CS310, Conversion to Water-Based Inks from Solvent-Based Inks, Enviro$en$e (1995).

  14. Case Study: CS192, The Substitution of Solvent-Based Inks, Coatings and Adhesives with Water-Based Products, Enviro$en$e (1995).

  15. Maust, M.J. Correlation of Dispersion and Polar Surface Energies with Printing on Plastic Films for Low VOC Inks, TAPPI J. 76:95 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 8.02, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1993, p. 521.

  17. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 8.01, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 1993, p. 453.

  18. Domingo, X., A Guide to the Surfactants World, Proa, Barcelona, 1995, p. 203.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marcomini, A., F. Filipuzzi, and W. Giger, Aromatic Surfactants in Laundry Detergents and Hard Surface Cleaners: Linear Alkylbenzene Sulfonates and Alkylphenol Polyethoxylates, Chemosphere 17:853 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Naylor, C.G., Environmental Fate of Alkylphenol Ethoxylates, Soap Cosmet. Chem. Spec. 68:27 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Naylor, C.G., Environmental Fate and Safety of Nonylphenol Ethoxylates, Text. Chem. Color 27:29 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Naylor, C.G., The Dirt on Detergents, Nonylphenol Ethoxylates, Popular Ingredients in Cleaning Products Are Not the Environmental Problem Commonly Believed, Waste Water 4:61 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Turvey, R.W., Chemical Use in Recycling, in Technology of Paper Recycling, edited by R.W.J. McKinney, Blackie Academic & Professional, New York, 1995, p. 130.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cox, M.F., Surfactants, in Detergents and Cleaners: A Handbook for Formulators, edited by K.R. Lange, Hanser Publishers, New York, 1994, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Porter M.R., Handbook of Surfactants, 2nd edn., Blackie Academic & Professional, New York, 1994, pp. 212, 248.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nakagawa, T., and K. Shinoda, Colloidal Surfactants, edited by K. Shinoda, T. Nakagawa, B. Tamamushi, and T. Isemura, Academic, New York, 1963, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ash, M., and I. Ash, Handbook of Industrial Surfactants, Gower, Brookfield, Vermont, 1974, p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Borchardt, J.K., Mechanistic Insights into Deinking, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 88:13 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferguson, L.D., Deinking Chemistry: Part 1, TAPPI J. 75:75 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rosen, M.J., Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, 2nd edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989, p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Griffin, W.C., Calculation of Hydrophile-Lipophile Balance Values of Noninoic Surfactants, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1:311 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Arif, S., Fatty Amine Ethoxylates, HAPPI 33(2):67 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walpole, R.E., and R.H. Myers, Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 3rd edn., Collier Macmillan, New York, 1985, pp. 222, 575.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stellner, K.L., and J.F. Scamehorn, Hardness Tolerance of Anionic Surfactant Solutions: II. Effect of Added Noninoic Surfactants, Langmuir 5:77 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatice Gecol.

About this article

Cite this article

Gecol, H., Scamehorn, J.F., Christian, S.D. et al. Deinking of water-based ink printing from plastic film using nonionic surfactants. J Surfact Deterg 5, 363–374 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-002-0235-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-002-0235-8

Key Words

Navigation