Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical chest compression: an alternative in helicopter emergency medical services?

  • EM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanical chest compression devices are mentioned in the current guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) as an alternative in long-lasting cardiopulmonary resuscitations (CPR) or during transport with ongoing CPR. We compared manual chest compression with mechanical devices in a rescue-helicopter-based scenario using a resuscitation manikin. Manual chest compression was compared with the mechanical devices LUCAS™ 2, AutoPulse™ and animax mono (10 series each) using the resuscitation manikin AmbuMan MegaCode Wireless, which was intubated endotracheally and controlled ventilated during the entire scenario. The scenario comprised the installation of each device, transport and loading phases, as well as a 10-min phase inside the helicopter (type BK 117). We investigated practicability as well as measured compression quality. All mechanical devices could be used readily in a BK 117 helicopter. The LUCAS 2 group was the only one that fulfilled all recommendations of the ERC (frequency 102 ± 0.1 min−1, compression depth 54 ± 3 mm, hands-off time 2.5 ± 1.6 %). Performing adequate manual chest compression was barely possible (fraction of correct compressions 21 ± 15 %). In all four groups, the total hands-off time was <10 %. Performing manual chest compressions during rescue-helicopter transport is barely possible, and only of poor quality. If rescuers are experienced, mechanical chest compression devices could be good alternatives in this situation. We found that the LUCAS 2 system complied with all recommendations of ERC guidelines, and all three tested devices worked consistently during the entire scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gräsner JT, Seewald S, Bohn A, Fischer M, Messelken M, Jantzen T, Wnent J (2014) Deutsches Reanimationsregister. Wissenschaft und Reanimationsforschung. Anaesthesist 63:470–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deakin CD, Nolan JP, Soar J, Sunde K, Koster RW, Smith GB, Perkins GD (2010) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 81:1305–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soar J, Perkins GD, Abbas G, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, Bierens JJLM, Brugger H, Deakin CD, Dunning J, Georgiou M, Handley AJ, Lockey DJ, Paal P, Sandroni C, Thies KC, Zideman DA, Nolan JP (2010) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 8. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances: electrolyte abnormalities, poisoning, drowning, accidental hypothermia, hyperthermia, asthma, anaphylaxis, cardiac surgery, trauma, pregnancy, electrocution. Resuscitation 81:1400–1433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sunde K, Wik L, Steen PA (1997) Quality of mechanical, manual standard and active compression-decompression CPR on the arrest site and during transport in a manikin model. Resuscitation 34:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Olasveengen TM, Wik L, Steen PA (2008) Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before and during transport in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 76:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ventzke MM, Gässler H, Lampl L, Helm M (2013) Cardio pump reloaded: in-hospital resuscitation during transport. Intern Emerg Med 8(7):621–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gässler H, Ventzke MM, Lampl L, Helm M (2013) Transport with ongoing resuscitation. Emerg Med J 30:589–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fox J, Fiechter R, Gerstl P, Url A, Wagner H, Lüscher TF, Eriksson U, Wyss CA (2013) Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions. Acute Cardiac Care 15:1–6. doi:10.3109/17482941.2012.735675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer M, Brell M, Ihli M, Messelken M, Rauch S, Schewe JC (2014) Mechanische Reanimationshilfen. Anaesthesist 63:186–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer M, Ihli M, Messelken M (2010) Mechani-sche Reanimationsgeräte. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 13:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  11. Omori K, Sato S, Sumi Y, Inoue Y, Okamoto K, Uzura M, Tanaka H (2013) The analysis of efficacy for AutoPulse™ system in flying helicopter. Resuscitation 84:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kyrval HS, Ahmad K (2010) Automatic mechanical chest compression during helicopter transportation. Ugeskr Laeger 172(46):3190–3191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pietsch U, Lischke V, Pietsch C (2014) Benefit of mechanical chest compression devices in mountain HEMS: lessons learned from 1 year of experience and evaluation. Air Med J 33(6):299–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashton A, McCluskey A, Gwinnutt CL, Keenan AM (2002) Effect of rescuer fatigue on performance of continuous external chest compression over 3 minutes. Resuscitation 55(2):151–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ong ME, Quah JL, Annathurai A, Noor NM, Koh ZX, Tan KB, Pothiawala S, Poh AH, Loy CK, Fook-Chong S (2013) Improving the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by training dedicated cardiac arrest teams incorporating a mechanical load-distributing device at the emergency department. Resuscitation 84:508–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yost D, Phillips RH, Gonzales L, Lick CJ, Satterlee P, Levy M, Barger J, Dodson P, Poggi S, Wojcik K, Niskanen RA, Chapman FW (2012) Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system. Resuscitation 83:961–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meaney PA, Bobrow BJ, Mancini ME, Christenson J, de Caen AR, Bhanji F, Abella BS, Kleinman ME, Edelson DP, Berg RA, Aufderheide TP, Menon V, Leary M, on behalf of the CPR Quality Summit Investigators, the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee, and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation (2013) CPR quality: improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 128:417–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ong ME, Mackey KE, Zhang ZC, Tanaka H, Ma MH, Swor R, Shin SD (2012) Mechanical CPR devices compared to manual CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ambulance transport: a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:39

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, Rubertsson S (2009) No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCASTM device—a pilot study. Resuscitation 80:1104–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Willy C, Völker HU, Steinmann R, Engelhardt M (2008) Kriegschirurgische Verletzungsmuster. Update 2007. Der Chirurg 79:66–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Curtis VJ (2007) The Three Block War: its causes and the shape of the peace. Can Army J 10(2):49–65

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weller N (2010) Ausbildung im Sanitätsdienst der Bundeswehr – ein ständiger Lernprozess. Wehrmedizin Wehrpharmazie 4:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  23. Helm M, Lührs J, Josse F, Kremers G, Weller N, Lampl L (2012) Konzept zur Basisausbildung von Notärzten im Sanitätsdienst der Bundeswehr. Ein Pilotprojekt am Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin 15(2):146–151

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dawes R (2009) Rhys Thomas GO. Battlefield resuscitation. Curr Opin Crit Care 15:527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of a dissertation thesis by Mrs. Simone Kümmerle.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standard

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section Emergency Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Armed Forces Medical Centre Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    Holger Gässler, Simone Kümmerle, Marc-Michael Ventzke, Lorenz Lampl & Matthias Helm

Authors
  1. Holger Gässler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simone Kümmerle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc-Michael Ventzke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lorenz Lampl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matthias Helm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Gässler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gässler, H., Kümmerle, S., Ventzke, MM. et al. Mechanical chest compression: an alternative in helicopter emergency medical services?. Intern Emerg Med 10, 715–720 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1238-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-015-1238-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation