Skip to main content
Log in

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Super Super Obese and Super Obese: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weight Results, Comorbidity Resolution

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) used for super obesity (SO) and super super obesity (SSO) remain controversial. The meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence.

Methods

We searched in MEDLINE and PubMed for studies concerning RYGB and SG for SO or SSO and pooled complication, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and resolution of comorbidities.

Results

Twelve studies were identified. RYGB achieved higher %EWL at 12 months, but no significant difference at 24 months. Resolution of diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia reached a statistical significance; however, there was no significant difference in hypertension.

Conclusions

RYGB was superior in %EWL for SSO and SO at 12 months. However, regarding at 24 months, RYGB was equal to SG, which is from a meta-analysis and cannot be seen as a definitive conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, et al. The incidence of comorbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sjostrom L, Peltonen M, Jacobson P, et al. Bariatric surgery and long-term cardiovascular events. JAMA. 2012;307:56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Renquist K. Obesity classification. Obes Surg. 1998;8:480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1822–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spaniolas K, Kasten KR, Brinkley JS, et al. The changing bariatric surgery landscape in the USA. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1544–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams TD, Davidson LE, Litwin SE, et al. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA. 2012;308:1122–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252:319–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Brown CC, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:21–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarela AI, Dexter SP, OʼKane M, et al. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 8–9-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:679–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eid GM, Brethauer S, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for super obese patients: forty-eight percent excess weight loss after 6 to 8 years with 93% follow-up. Ann Surg. 2012;256:262–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorman RB, Serrot FJ, Miller CJ, et al. Case-matched outcomes in bariatric surgery for treatment of type2 diabetes in the morbidly obese patient. Ann Surg. 2012;255:287–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Golzarand M, Toolabi K, Farid R. The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4331–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2005. 5:13.

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Serrano OK, Tannebaum JE, Cumella L, et al. Weight loss outcomes and complications from bariatric surgery in the super super obese. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2505–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzalez-Heredia R, Sanchez-Johnsen L, Valbuena VS, et al. Surgical management of super–super obese patients: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(5):2097–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duprée A, El Gammal AT, Wolter S, et al. Perioperative short-term outcome in super-super-obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):1895–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Celio AC, Wu Q, Kasten KR, et al. Comparative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super obese patients. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bettencourt-Silva R, Neves JS, Pedro J.et al. Comparative effectiveness of different bariatric procedures in super morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):281–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Uno K, Seki Y, Kasama K, et al. A comparison of the bariatric procedures that are performed in the treatment of super morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2537–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thereaux J, Corigliano N, Poitou C, et al. Comparison of results after one year between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m2. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):785–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jain D, Sill A, Averbach A. Do patients with higher baseline BMI have improved weight loss with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(9):1304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong J, Park S, Menzo EL, et al. Midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone procedure in super-obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;03(14):3.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Daigle CR, Andalib A, Corcelles R, et al. Bariatric and metabolic outcomes in the super-obese elderly. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arapis K, Makrina N, Diana K. et al. Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super obese patients (BMI ≥ 60kg/m2): 6-year follow-up at a single university. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.09.487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Onyewu SC, Ogundimu OO, Gezzer Ortega BS, et al. Bariatric surgery outcomes in black patients with super morbid obesity: a 1-year postoperative review. Am J Surg. 2017;213:64–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Y, Wang J, Ju W, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related comorbidities: a meta-analysis of 21 studies. Obes Surg. 2015;25:19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, et al. Total weight loss as the outcome measure of choice after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1794–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Garg H, Aggarwal S, Misra MC, et al. Mid to long term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Indian population: 3-7 year results - a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2017;48:201–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugerman HJ. Gastric bypass surgery for severe obesity. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2002;9:79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alexandrides KT, Skroubis G, Kalfarentzos F. Resolution of diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and a variant of biliopancreatic diversion in patients with morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2007;17:176–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass: 10-year follow up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:516–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-ting Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent Statement

Does not apply.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Song, Yh., Chen, J. et al. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Super Super Obese and Super Obese: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weight Results, Comorbidity Resolution. OBES SURG 29, 1954–1964 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03817-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03817-4

Keywords

Navigation