Abstract
Background
In bariatric surgery, the procedure with the highest average weight loss is the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS). A new simplified duodenal switch called the stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery with less malabsorption and one fewer anastomosis claims to have similar outcomes when compared to the BPDDS.
Methods
A retrospective matched cohort analysis of SIPS versus BPDDS patients in a single private practice was obtained by matching every BPDDS to a SIPS patient of the same gender and BMI. Excess weight loss percentage (EWL), BMI, and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) were compared. Additionally, comorbidity resolution, nutritional data, and complications were also compared. Data was analyzed using both descriptive and comparative statistics.
Results
Over 2 years, there was no statistical difference in weight loss between BPDDS and SIPS. There also was no difference in nutritional data between the two procedures pre- and post-op. Complication rates were lower in SIPS however, due to the small sample sizes this is not statistically significant.
Conclusion
Weight loss and nutritional results between SIPS and BPDDS are similar at 2 years. However, there are fewer complications with SIPS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brethauer S, Hammel J, Schauer P. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:469–75.
Buchwald H, Qien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36. doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0864-0.
Vuolo G, Voglino C, Tirone A, et al. Is sleeve gastrectomy a therapeutic procedure for all obese patients? Int J Surg. 2016;30:48–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.026.
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1720–6.
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:351–5.
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:731–5.
Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024.
Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(5):1092–8. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2015.01.024.
Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Perez-Aquirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy proposed technieque. Obes Surg. 2007;17(12):1614–8.
Kennedy-Dalby A, Adam S, Ammori BJ, et al. Weight loss and metabolic outcomes of bariatric surgery in men versus women—a matched comparative observational cohort study. Eur J Intern Med. 2014;25:922–5.
Okafor PN, Lien C, Bairdain S, et al. Effect of vagotomy during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on weight loss outcomes. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2015. 9(3):274–80.
Coleman KJ, Brookey J. Gender and racial/ethnic background predict weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass independent of health and lifestyle behaviors. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1729–36.
Arterburn D, Livingston EH, Olsen MK, et al. Predictors of initial weight loss after gastric bypass surgery in twelve Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013;7:e367–76.
Palmisano S, Silvestri M, Giuricin M, et al. Preoperative predictive factors of successful weight loss and glycaemic control 1 year after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2015.15(11):2040–6.
Parri A, Benaiges D, Schröder H, et al. Preoperative predictors of weight loss at 4 years following bariatric surgery. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30:420–4. doi:10.1177/0884533614568154.
Wise ES, Hocking KM, Kavic SM. Prediction of excess weight loss after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: data from an artificial neural network. Surg Endosc. 2016. 30(2):480–8.
Mor A, Sharp L, Portenier D, et al. Weight loss at first postoperative visit predicts long-term outcome of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using Duke weight loss surgery chart. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:556–60.
Cazzo E, da Silva FP, Pareja JC, et al. Predictors for weight loss failure following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014;51:328–30. doi:10.1590/S0004-28032014000400011.
Fox B, Chen E, Suzo A, et al. Dietary and psych predictors of weight loss after gastric bypass. J Surg Res. 2015. 197(2):283–90
Contreras JE, Santander C, Court I, et al. Correlation between age and weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1286–9. doi:10.1007/s11695-013-0905-3.
Yoon J, Sherman J, Argiroff A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for the aging population. Obes Surg. 2016.
Still CD, Wood GC, Chu X, et al. Clinical factors associated with weight loss outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(3):888–94. doi:10.1002/oby.20529.
Campos GM, Rabl C, Mulligan K, et al. Factors associated with weight loss after gastric bypass. Arch Surg. 2008;143(9):877–84. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.9.877.
Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2077-4.
Cottam A, Cottam D, Roslin M, et al. A matched cohort analysis of sleeve gastrectomy with and without 300 cm loop duodenal switch with 18-month follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016.
Cottam A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18 month follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2015;30:3958–64.
Marceau P, Biron S, Marceau S, et al. Long-term metabolic outcomes 5 to 20 years after biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1584–93. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1599-5.
Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI > 50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(6):858–63.
Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+ years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.013.
Risstad H, Sovik TT, Engstrom M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3579.
Sovik TT, Karlsson J, Aasheim ET, et al. Gastrointestinal function and eating behavior after gastric bypass and duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):641–7. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2012.06.006.
Higa K, Ho T, Tercero F, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 10-year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):516–25. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2010.10.019.
Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):926–32. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2.
Musella M, Susa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multicenter review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(1):156–63. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3141-y.
Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive min-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703. doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z.
Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D. Retrograde filling of the afferent limb as a cause of chronic nausea after single anastomosis loop duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.018.
Summerhays C, Cottam D, Cottam A. Internal hernia after revisional laparoscopic loop duodenal switch surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):e13–5. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2015.08.510.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Statement of Human and Animal Rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Inform Consent
Since this is a retrospective study formal consent is not required for this type of study.
Conflict of Interest
Austin Cottam has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Daniel Cottam the corresponding author reports personal fees and other from Medtronic, outside the submitted work.
Dana Portenier has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Hinali Zaveri has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Amit Surve has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Samuel Cottam has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Legrand Belnap has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Walter Medlin has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Christina Richards has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cottam, A., Cottam, D., Portenier, D. et al. A Matched Cohort Analysis of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Saving (SIPS) Surgery Versus Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch with Two-Year Follow-up. OBES SURG 27, 454–461 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2341-7