Skip to main content
Log in

One Thousand Consecutive Mini-Gastric Bypass: Short- and Long-term Outcome

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing evidence that mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a safe and effective procedure. Operative outcome and long-term follow-up of a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent MGB are reported. The data on 1,000 patients who underwent MGB from November 2005 to January 2011 at an academic institution were reviewed. Mean age was 33.15 ± 10.17 years (range, 14–72), preoperative BMI was 42.5 ± 6.3 kg/m2 (range, 26–75), mean preoperative weight was 121.6 ± 23.8 kg (range, 71–240), and 663 were women. Operative time and length of stay for primary vs. revisional MGB were 89 ± 12.8 min vs. 144 ± 15 min (p < 0.01) and l.85 ± 0.8 day vs. 2.35 ± 1.89 day (p < 0.01). No deaths occurred within 30 days of surgery. Short-term complications occurred in 2.7% for primary vs. 11.6% for revisionnal MGB (p < 0.01). Five (0.5%) patients presented with leakage from the gastic tube but none had anastomotic leakage. Four (0.4%) patients, all with revisionnal MGB, presented with severe bile reflux and were cured by stapling the afferent loop and by a latero-lateral jejunojejunostomy. Excessive weight loss occurred in four patients; two were reversed and two were converted to sleeve gastrectomy. Maximal percent excess weight loss (EWL) of 72.5% occurred at 18 months. Weight regain subsequently occurred with a mean variation of −3.9% EWL at 60 months. The 50% EWL was achieved for 95% of patients at 18 months and for 89.8% at 60 months. MGB is an effective, relatively low-risk, and low-failure bariatric procedure. In addition, it can be easily revised, converted, or reversed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the 1.274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001;11:276–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang HH, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005;15:648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Noun R, Zeidan S. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: an effective option for the treatment of morbid obesity. J Chir (Paris). 2007;144:301–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:20–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee WJ, Chen JC, Ser KH. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results and final report of a randomized trial. 14th World Congress of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders. Paris, August 2009.

  6. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement. Obes Surg. 1991;1:257–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deitel M, Shabi B. Morbid obesity: selection of patients for surgery. J Am Coll Nutr. 1992;11:457–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Noun R, Riachi E, Zeidan S, et al. Mini-gastric bypass by Mini-laparotomy: a cost-effective alternative in the laparoscopic era. Obes Surg 2007; 1482-86.

  9. DeMaria EJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, et al. Results of 281 total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2002;235:640–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JAB, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanchez-Santos R, Estevez S, Tome C et al. Training program influence in the learning curve of laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2011, 1. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-011-0398-x

  12. Chakhtoura G, Zinzindohoue F, Ghanem Y, et al. Primary results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass in a french obesity-surgery specialized university hospital. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1130–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marshall JS, Srivastava A, Gupta SK, et al. Roux-en-Y leak complications. Arch Surg. 2003;138:523–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carucci LR, Turner MA, Conklin RC, et al. Roux-enY gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity: evaluation of postoperative extraluminal leaks with upper gastrointestinal series. Radiology. 2006;238:119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Revisionnal vs primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass a case-matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1627–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Christou N, Efthimiou E. Five-year outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a comprehensive bariatric surgery program in Canada. Can J Surg. 2009;52:249–58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Helling T, Balliro J. The lethality of obstructing hematoma at the jejunojejunostomy following Roux-enY gastric bypass (correspondance). Obes Surg. 2005;15:290–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eckhauser A, Torquati A, Youssef Y, et al. Internal hernia: postoperative complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;7:581–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naef M, Mouton W, Wagner H. Small bowel volvulus in late pregnancy due to internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1737–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paroz A, Calmes JM, Giusti V, et al. Internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a continuous challenge in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1482–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gazzalle A, Braun D, Cavazolla LT, et al. Late intestinal obstruction due to an intestinal volvulus in a pregnant patient with a previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1740–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Noun R, Zeidan S, Safa N. Laparoscopic latero-lateral jejuno-jejunostomy as a rescue procedure after complicated mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1539–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones KB. Biliopancreatic limb obstruction in gastric bypass at or proximal to the jejunojejunostomy: a potentially deadly catastrophic event. Obes Surg. 1996;6:485–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Iannelli A, Amato D, Addeo P, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of vertical gastroplasty into Roux-en-Y gastric Bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;1:43–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gumbs A, Pomp A, Gagner M. Revisionnal bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1137–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ballesta C, Berindoague R, Cabrera M, et al. Management of anastomotic leaks after laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18:623–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang W, Huang MT, Wei PL, et al. Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass for failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2004;14:777–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schouten R, Van Dielen FM, Van Gemert WG, et al. Conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in restoration of the positive effect on weight loss and co-morbidities: evaluation of 101 patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:622–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Noun R, Zeidan S, Riachi E, et al. Mini-gastric bypass for revision of failed primary restrictive procedures: a valuable option. Obes Surg. 2007;17:684–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brolin R, Cody R. Impact of technological advances on complications of revisional bariatric operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:1137–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rutledge R, Walsh T. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee WJ, Wang W, Lee YC, et al. Laparoccopic mini-gastric ypass: experience with tailored bypass limb according to body weight. Obes Surg. 2008;18:294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obes Rev. 2011;28:1467–789.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio-herera MA, Perez-Aguirre ME, et al. Single anatomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastectomy. One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1720–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

All contributing authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger Noun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noun, R., Skaff, J., Riachi, E. et al. One Thousand Consecutive Mini-Gastric Bypass: Short- and Long-term Outcome. OBES SURG 22, 697–703 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0618-z

Keywords

Navigation