Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Is Rarely Needed if Standard Operative Techniques Are Performed

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Facchiano E, Leuratti L, Veltri M, et al. Laparoscopic conversion of one anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for chronic bile reflux. Ob Surg. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-2017-8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1890–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Georgiadou D, Sergentanis TN, Nixon A, et al. Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. A systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:984–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deitel M. Mini-gastric (one-anastomosis) bypass becoming a mainstream operation. Bariatric News, issue 18, Dec. 2013 – page 13.

  5. Carbajo MA, Luque-de-Leon E. Mini-gastric bypass/one-anastomosis gastric bypass—standardizing the name. Obes Surg. 2015;25:858–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson WH, Fernandez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rutledge R, Walsh T. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Musella M, Milone M. Still “controversies” about the mini gastric bypass? Ob Surg. 2014;24:643–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47:1345–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carbajo M, Garcia-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One-anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(3):398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22:697–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Musella M, Sousa A, Greco F, et al. The laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass: the Italian experience: outcomes from 974 consecutive cases in a multi-center review. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:156–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kular KS, Manchanda N, Rutledge R. A 6-year experience with 1,054 mini-gastric bypasses—first study from Indian subcontinent. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chevallier JM, Arman GA, Guenzi M, et al. One thousand single anastomosis (omega loop) gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity in a 7-year period: outcomes show few complications and good efficacy. Obes Surg. 2015;25:951–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jammu GS, Sharma R. A 7-year clinical audit of 1107 cases comparing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y gastric bypass, and mini-gastric bypass, to determine an effective and safe bariatric and metabolic procedure. Obes Surg. DOI 10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2

  16. Tolone S, Cristiano S, Savarino E, et al. Effects of omega-loop bypass on esophagogastric junction function. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2016;12:62–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McQuaid KR, Laine L, Fennerty MB, et al. Systematic review: the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and related neoplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(2):146–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seoane A, Bessa X, Alameda F, et al. Role of Helicobacter pylori in stomach cancer after partial gastrectomy for benign ulcer disease. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2005;97(11):778–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Babor R, Booth M. Adenocarcinoma in the gastric pouch 26 years after loop gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006;16:935–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scozzari G, Trapani R, Toppino M, et al. Esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery: systematic review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu CC, Lee WJ, Ser KH, et al. Gastric cancer after mini-gastric bypass surgery: a case report. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013;6:303–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee WJ, Lee YC, Ser KH, et al. Revisional surgery for laparoscopic minigastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7(4):486–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coblijn UK, Goucham AB, Lagarde SM, et al. Development of ulcer disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, incidence, risk factors and patient presentation: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):299–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain

    Enrique Luque-de-León & Miguel A. Carbajo

  2. Centro de Excelencia para el Estudio y Tratamiento de la Obesidad y la Diabetes – Filial Latinoamericana & The American British Cowdray, Medical Center, I.A.P., Av. Carlos Graef Fernandez No. 154 Suite 515 Col. Tlaxala, Santa Fe, 05300, Mexico City, Mexico

    Enrique Luque-de-León

Authors
  1. Enrique Luque-de-León
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel A. Carbajo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Luque-de-León.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All the authors declare they have approved the manuscript and have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Informed Consent

The statement of informed consent is not applicable.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

The statement of human and animal rights is not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luque-de-León, E., Carbajo, M.A. Conversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Is Rarely Needed if Standard Operative Techniques Are Performed. OBES SURG 26, 1588–1591 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2172-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2172-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation