Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to “Still Controversies After Mini Gastric Bypass”

  • Letter to Editor/LED Reply
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Brown J, et al. “Mini” gastric bypass: systematic review of a controversial procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1890–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Balupuri S, et al. Controversy surrounding ‘mini’ gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2014;24(2):324–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson WH, Fernanadez AZ, Farrell TM, et al. Surgical revision of loop (“mini”) gastric bypass procedure: multicenter review of complications and conversions to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(1):37–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Noun R, Skaff J, Riachi E, et al. One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: short- and long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):697–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scozzari G, Trapani R, Toppino M, et al. Esophagogastric cancer after bariatric surgery: systematic review of the literature. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal K. Mahawar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahawar, K.K., Carr, W.R.J., Jennings, N. et al. Reply to “Still Controversies After Mini Gastric Bypass”. OBES SURG 24, 645–646 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1194-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1194-1

Keywords

Navigation