Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primary Results of Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass in a French Obesity-Surgery Specialized University Hospital

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since 2002, we have performed 350 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB). We decided to evaluate the laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass (LMGB), an operation reported as effective, yet simpler than LRYGB. It consisted of a long lesser curvature tube with a terminolateral gastroenterostomy, 200 cm distal to the Treitz ligament.

Methods

From October 2006 to November 2007, 100 patients (23 men and 77 women) underwent LMGB. The mean age was 40.9 ± 11.5 years (17.5–62.4), the preoperative mean body weight was 131 ± 23.1 kg (82–203) and the mean BMI was 46.9 ± 7.4 kg/m2 (32.8–72.4). Twenty-four patients had prior restrictive procedure: 20 LAGB of which nine were already removed and four VBG (two laparoscopic and two by open surgery). In preoperative gastric endoscopy Helicobacter pylorii was present in 26 patients and eradicated.

Results

All procedures were completed laparoscopically by six different surgeons. Mean operative time was 129 ± 37 min. There was no death. Seven patients (7%) presented major early complications: three reoperations for incarcerated herniation of small bowel in the trocar wound, one peritonitis due to a traumatic injury of the biliary limb, one perianastomotic abscess, one intraabdominal bleeding requiring splenectomy, and one endoscopic haemostasis for anastomotic bleeding. One patient presented anastomotic stenosis that required endoscopic dilatation 2 months postoperatively. Mean BMI at 3 months was 38.7 kg/m2 (31.2–60.9) and at 6 months 35.1 (23.6–53.0). Nine patients complained of diarrhea that resolved 3 months postoperatively and, significantly, only two patients complained of biliary reflux.

Conclusion

Pending long-term evaluation, LMBG seems a good alternative to LRYGB, giving the same results with a more simple and reproductible technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balsiger BM, Poggio JL, Mai J, et al. Ten and more years after vertical banded gastroplasty as primary operation for morbid obesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Nov–Dec;4(6):598–605.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chevallier JM, Paita M, Rodde-Dunet MH, et al. Predictive factors of outcome after gastric banding: a nationwide survey on the role of center activity and patients’ behavior. Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246:1034–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg. 2001 Jun;11:276–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher BL, Buchwald H, Clark W, et al. Mini-gastric bypass controversy. Obes Surg. 2001 Dec;11:773–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Wei PL, Lee YC, et al. Short-term results of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005 May;15:648–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Noun R, Riachi E, Zeidan S, et al. Mini-gastric bypass by mini-laparotomy: a cost-effective alternative in the laparoscopic era. Obes Surg. 2007 Nov;17(11):1482–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee WJ, Yu PJ, Wang W, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005 Jul;242:20–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carbajo M, Garcia-Caballero M, Toledano M, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass by laparoscopy: results of the first 209 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutledge R, Walsh TR. Continued excellent results with the mini-gastric bypass: six-year study in 2,410 patients. Obes Surg. 2005 Oct;15:1304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kondo K. Duodenogastric reflux and gastric stump carcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2002;5:16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer AB, Graem N, Jensen OM. Risk of gastric cancer after Billroth 2 resection for duodenal ulcer. Br J Surg. 1983;70:552–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Toftgaard C. Gastric cancer after peptic ulcer surgery. Ann Surg. 1989;210:159–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schafer LW, Larson DE, Melton LJ, Higgins JA, et al. The risk of gastric carcinoma after surgical treatment for benign ulcer disease. A population-based study in Olmsted county, Minnesota. N Engl J Med. 1983;309:1210–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassily R, Smallwood RA, Crotty B. Risk of gastric cancer is not increased after partial gastrectomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:762–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Von Holstein CS. Long-term prognosis after partial gastrectomy for gastroduodenal ulcer. World J Surg. 2000;24:307–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tersmette AC, Offerhaus GJA, Tersmette KWF, et al. Meta-analysis of the risk of gastric stump cancer: detection of high risk patient for stomach cancer after remote partial gastrectomy for benign conditions. Cancer Res. 1990;50:6486–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Chevallier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakhtoura, G., Zinzindohoué, F., Ghanem, Y. et al. Primary Results of Laparoscopic Mini-Gastric Bypass in a French Obesity-Surgery Specialized University Hospital. OBES SURG 18, 1130–1133 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9594-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9594-8

Keywords

Navigation