Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of size of proximal gastric pouch and short-term weight loss following routine upper gastrointestinal contrast study after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The authors investigated whether there is any correlation between gastric pouch size measured by routine upper gastrointestinal contrast study (UGI) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) and short-term weight loss.

Methods: The study group consisted of 82 patients (66F, 16M) who underwent LRYGBP. Body mass index before surgery ranged from 35.4 to 71.7 kg/m2, with a mean of 47.4 kg/m2. UGI was performed 1 day after LRYGBP in all patients. Proximal gastric pouch size was estimated by multiplying maximal transverse and longitudinal diameters on AP spot image or film. Percent excess weight loss (%EWL) obtained at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery was used as an indicator of short-term results. According to the presence of contrast passage through the gastrojejunostomy, each patient was classified into 2 groups: Group A, negative; Group B, positive.

Results: There was no correlation between proximal gastric pouch size and %EWL at any point of time (P>0.05). The correlation coefficients calculated for 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery were 0.038, 0.110, 0.015 and 0.042, respectively (Pearson correlation test). The gastric pouch size of Group A was larger than that of Group B (Studentt-test,P<0.001). There was no difference in %EWL between Groups A and B at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Pouch size area, measured by routine UGI study on the first postoperative day, does not influence short-term postoperative weight loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stoeckli R, Chanda R, Langer I et al. Changes of body weight and plasma ghrelin levels after gastric banding and gastric bypass. Obes Res 2004; 12: 346–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Freedman MR, King J, Kennedy E. Popular diets: a scientific review Obes Res 2001; 9 (Suppl 1):1S-40S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am 2001; 81: 1145–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wittgrove AC, Clark GW. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y — 500 patients: Technique and results, with 3–60 month follow-up. Obes Surg 2000; 10: 233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoopen-Margain E, Fajardo R, Espana N et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: results of our learning curve in 100 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 201–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 1029–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Serafini F, Anderson W, Ghassemi P et al. The utility of contrast studies and drains in the management of patients after Roux-en-Y gastic bypass. Obes Surg 2002; 12: 34–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Blachar A, Federle MP, Pearler KM et al. Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 2002; 223: 625–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sims TL, Mullican MA, Hamilton EC et al. Routine upper gastrointestinal Gastrografin swallow after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Res 2003; 13: 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carucci LR, Turner MA. Radiologic evaluation following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity. Eur J Radiol 2005; 53: 353–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement. Obes Surg 1991; 1: 257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madan AK, Tichansky DS, Phillips JC. Does pouch size matter? Obes Surg 2007; 17: 317–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raftopoulos I, Ercole F, Udekwu AO et al. Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass stratified by a body mass index of 70 kg/m2: a comparative analysis of 825 procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9: 44–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flanagan L. Measurement of functional pouch volume following the gastric bypass procedure. Obes Surg 1996; 6: 38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akihiro Nishie MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishie, A., Brown, B., Barloon, T. et al. Comparison of size of proximal gastric pouch and short-term weight loss following routine upper gastrointestinal contrast study after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. OBES SURG 17, 1183–1188 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9200-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9200-5

Key words

Navigation