Abstract
Inbreeding is sometimes tolerated in species occupying patchy, unpredictable habitats, when it becomes too costly to outbreed. Although traits leading to inbreeding depression may be selected against, the accumulation of deleterious alleles from constant inbreeding might promote outbreeding. Littledale’s whistling rat Parotomys littledalei occupies patchy habitats in arid western South Africa, and inbreeds in captivity without suffering inbreeding depression. We tested whether female whistling rats make different mate choice decisions based on their inbreeding status, by providing inbred and outbred females with male odours in four pairwise combinations: unrelated outbred (r = 0) versus either familiar littermate sibling (r = 0.5), half-sibling (r = 0.25), first cousin (r = 0.125), or unrelated inbred (r = 0). Inbred females generally preferred unrelated males, but did not show a preference between unrelated males and first cousins. In contrast, outbred females did not generally show a preference, but preferred first cousins to unrelated males. In breeding trials, reproductive success (output and viability of young) of outbred females paired with unrelated or related males was equally high, whereas inbred females suffered reduced reproductive success when paired with closely-related males. Our results indicate that the inbreeding status of female whistling rats influences their decision to outbreed or inbreed, which might influence their fitness. While outbred whistling rats do not suffer inbreeding depression, the costs of constant inbreeding could promote outbreeding by inbred females. We propose that the choice to inbreed or outbreed in female whistling rats depends on their inbreeding status and the genetic relatedness of available mates, with outbreeding more likely to occur unless unrelated mates are not available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armitage, K. B., Van Vuren, D. H., Ozgul, A., & Oli, M. K. (2011). Proximate causes of natal dispersal in female yellow-bellied marmots, Marmota flaviventris. Ecology, 92, 218–227.
Barnard, C. J., & Fitzsimmons, J. (1988). Kin recognition and mate choice in mice: the effects of kinship, familiarity and social interference on intersexual interaction. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1078–1090.
Bataillon, T., & Kirkpatrick, M. (2000). Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations infinite populations: Size does matter. Genetical Research, 75, 75–81.
Batzli, G. O., Getz, L. L., & Hurley, S. S. (1977). Suppression of growth and reproduction of microtine rodents by social factors. Journal of Mammalogy, 58, 583–591.
Bilde, T., Lubin, Y., Smith, D., Schneider, J. M., & Maklakov, A. A. (2005). The transition to social inbred mating systems in spiders: Role of inbreeding tolerance in a subsocial predecessor. Evolution, 59, 160–174.
Boake, C. R. B. (1986). A method for testing adaptive hypotheses of mate choice. American Naturalist, 127, 654–666.
Boik, R. J. (1981). A priori tests in repeated measures designs: Effects of nonsphericity. Psychometrika, 46, 241–255.
Boonstra, R., & Hochachka, W. M. (1997). Maternal effects and additive genetic inheritance in the collard lemming Dicrostonyx groenlandicus. Evolutionary Ecology, 11, 169–182.
Brennan, P. A., & Kendrick, K. M. (2006). Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 361, 2061–2078.
Cant, M. A., Otali, E., & Mwanguyha, F. (2001). Eviction and dispersal in co-operatively breeding banded mongooses (Mungo mungo). Journal of Zoology London, 254, 155–162.
Charlesworth, D., & Charlesworth, B. (1987). Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 237–268.
Charlesworth, D., & Willis, J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10, 783–796.
Cheetham, S. A., Thom, M. D., Jury, F., Ollier, W. E. R., Beynon, R. J., & Hurst, J. L. (2007). The genetic basis of individual-recognition signals in the mouse. Current Biology, 17, 1771–1777.
Ciszek, D. (2000). New colony formation in the “highly inbred” eusocial naked mole-rat: outbreeding is preferred. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 1–6.
Coetzee, C. G. (1969). The distribution of mammals in the Namib desert and adjoining inland escarpment. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert Research Station, 40, 23–36.
Coetzee, C. G., & Jackson, T. P. (1999). The comparative behaviour and ecology of two species of Parotomys (Mammalia, Rodentia, Otomyinae) found in the arid areas of southern Africa. Journal of the Namibia Science Society, 47, 87–106.
Crnokrak, P., & Roff, D. A. (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity, 83, 260–270.
Devlin, B., & Roeder, K. (1999). Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics, 55, 997–1004.
Frankham, R. (1995). Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 29, 305–327.
Greenwood, P. J., & Harvey, P. H. (1982). The natal and breeding dispersal of birds. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13, 1–21.
Hargreaves, A. L., & Eckert, C. G. (2014). Evolution of dispersal and mating systems along geographic gradients: implications for shifting ranges. Functional Ecology, 28, 5–21.
Harvey, P. H., & Ralls, K. (1986). Do animals avoid incest? Nature, 320, 575–576.
Hauber, M. E., & Sherman, P. W. (2001). Self-referent phenotype matching: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends in Neuroscience, 24, 609–616.
Hurst, J. L., Payne, C. E., Nevison, C. M., Marie, A. D., Humphries, R. E., Robertson, D. H. L., et al. (2001). Individual recognition in mice mediated by major urinary proteins. Nature, 414, 631–634.
Ishibashi, Y., & Saitoh, T. (2008). Role of male-biased dispersal in inbreeding avoidance in the grey-sided vole (Myodes rufocanus). Molecular Ecology, 17, 4887–4896.
Jackson, T. P. (2000). Adaptation to living in an open arid environment: Lessons from the burrow structure of the two southern African whistling rats, Parotomys brantsii and P. littledalei. Journal of Arid Environments, 46, 345–355.
Keane, B. (1990). The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Animal Behaviour, 39, 264–273.
Keane, B., Creel, S. R., & Waser, P. M. (1996). No evidence of inbreeding avoidance or inbreeding depression in a social carnivore. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 480–489.
Keller, L., & Ross, K. G. (1998). Selfish genes: A green beard in the red fire ant. Nature, 394, 573–575.
Keller, L. F., & Waller, D. M. (2002). Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 230–241.
Kokko, H., & Ots, I. (2006). When not to avoid inbreeding. Evolution, 60, 467–475.
Lane, J. E., Boutin, S., Gunn, M. R., Slate, J., & Coltman, D. W. (2007). Genetic relatedness of mates does not predict patterns of parentage in North American red squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 74, 611–619.
Lehmann, L., & Perrin, N. (2003). Inbreeding avoidance through kin recognition: Choosy females boost male dispersal. American Naturalist, 162, 638–652.
Lenchova, P., Roberts, S. C., & Havlicek, J. (2008). Methods of human body odor sampling: The effect of freezing. Chemical Senses, 34, 127–138.
Loyau, A., Cornuau, J. H., Clobert, J., & Danchin, E. (2012). Incestuous sisters: Mate preferences for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE, 7, e51293.
Mateo, J. M. (2002). Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 721–727.
Mateo, J. M. (2010). Self-referent phenotype matching and longterm maintenance of kin recognition. Animal Behaviour, 80, 929–935.
McParland, S., Kearney, J. F., Rath, M., & Berry, D. P. (2007). Inbreeding effects on milk production, calving performance, fertility, and conformation in Irish Holstein-Friesians. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 4411–4419.
Millar, J. S. (1977). Adaptive features of mammalian reproduction. Evolution, 31, 370–386.
Peer, K., & Taborsky, M. (2005). Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating. Evolution, 59, 317–323.
Pillay, N. (2002a). Father-daughter recognition and inbreeding avoidance in the striped mouse, Rhabdomys pumilio. Mammalian Biology, 67, 212–218.
Pillay, N. (2002b). Reproduction and postnatal development in Littledale’s whistling rat Parotomys littledalei. Mammalia, 66, 71–82.
Pillay, N. (2002c). Inbreeding in Littledale’s whistling rat Parotomys littledalei. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 293, 171–178.
Pillay, N., Eborall, J., & Ganem, G. (2006). Divergence of mate recognition in the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio). Behavioral Ecology, 17, 757–764.
Pusey, A., & Wolf, M. (1996). Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 201–206.
Puurtinen, M. (2011). Mate choice for optimal (k) inbreeding. Evolution, 65, 1501–1505.
Ralls, K., Ballou, J. D., & Templeton, A. (1988). Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Conservation Biology, 2, 185–193.
Romagnoli, S. (2005). Failure to conceive in the queen. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 7, 59–63.
Rymer, T., & Pillay, N. (2010). Female mate choice for paternal care behaviour in African striped mice Rhabdomys pumilio: The role of experience. Behaviour, 147, 1101–1119.
Sagvik, J., Uller, T., & Olsson, M. (2005). Outbreeding depression in the common frog, Rana temporaria. Conservation Genetics, 6, 205–211.
Schausberger, P. (2007). Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: Prior association or phenotype matching? Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 62, 119–125.
Schradin, C. (2005). When to live alone and when to live in groups: Ecological determinants of sociality in the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio, Sparrman, 1784). Belgian Journal of Zoology, 135, 77–82.
Schradin, C., & Pillay, N. (2004). The striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) from the succulent karoo of South Africa: A territorial group living solitary forager with communal breeding and helpers at the nest. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 37–47.
Schradin, C., & Pillay, N. (2005). Demography of the striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) in the succulent karoo. Mammalian Biology, 70, 84–92.
Sherborne, A. L., Thom, M. D., Paterson, S., Jury, F., Ollier, W. E. R., Stockley, P., et al. (2007). The genetic basis of inbreeding avoidance in house mice. Current Biology, 17, 2061–2066.
Skinner, J. D., & Chimimba, C. T. (2005). The mammals of the southern African subregion. Cape Town: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, A. T., & Ivins, B. L. (1983). Colonization in a pika population: Dispersal vs philopatry. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 13, 37–47.
Szulkin, M., Stopher, K. V., Pemberton, J. M., & Reid, J. M. (2013). Inbreeding avoidance, tolerance, or preference in animals? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 205–211.
Thünken, T., Bakker, T. C. M., Baldauf, S. A., & Kullmann, H. (2007). Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Current Biology, 17, 225–229.
Tregenza, T., & Wedell, N. (2000). Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited review. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1013–1027.
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Verhoeven, K. J. F., Macel, M., Wolfe, L. M., & Biere, A. (2011). Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 278, 2–8.
Wang, C., & Lu, X. (2011). Female ground tits prefer relatives as extra-pair partners: Driven by kin-selection? Molecular Ecology, 20, 2851–2863.
Waser, P. M., Austad, S. N., & Keane, B. (1986). When should animals tolerate inbreeding? American Naturalist, 128, 529–537.
Zeh, J. A., & Zeh, D. W. (1996). The evolution of polyandry I: Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 1711–1717.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Central Animal Services for technical assistance, and Northern Cape Nature Conservation for permission to collect animals. The comments by two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This study complied with the laws and regulations in South Africa and was approved by the Animal Ethics Screening Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand (Clearance No. 99/08/2A).
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pillay, N., Rymer, T.L. Preference for Outbreeding in Inbred Littledale’s Whistling Rats Parotomys littledalei . Evol Biol 44, 21–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9383-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-016-9383-6