Skip to main content
Log in

A priori tests in repeated measures designs: Effects of nonsphericity

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The validity conditions for univariate repeated measures designs are described. Attention is focused on the sphericity requirement. For av degree of freedom family of comparisons among the repeated measures, sphericity exists when all contrasts contained in thev dimensional space have equal variances. Under nonsphericity, upper and lower bounds on test size and power of a priori, repeated measures,F tests are derived. The effects of nonsphericity are illustrated by means of a set of charts. The charts reveal that small departures from sphericity (.97 ≤ ɛ<1.00) can seriously affect test size and power. It is recommended that separate rather than pooled error term procedures be routinely used to test a priori hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boik, R. J. Interactions in the analysis of variance: A procedure for interpretation and a Monte Carlo comparison of univariate and multivariate methods for repeated measures designs (Doctoral dissertation, Baylor University, 1975).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1975,36, 2908B. (University Microfilms No. 75-27, 837).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boik, R. J. Interactions, partial interactions, and interaction contrasts in the analysis of variance.Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86, 1084–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boik, R. J., & Kirk, R. E. A general method for partitioning sums of squares of treatments and interactions in the analysis of variance.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977,37, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. Some theorems on quadratic forms in the study of analysis of variance problems, I. Effect of inequality of variances and correlation between errors in the two-way classification.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1954b,25, 484–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradu, D., & Gabriel, K. R. Simultaneous statistical inference on interactions in two way analysis of variance.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1974,69, 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. W., & Grizzle, J. E. Applications of multivariate analysis to repeated measurements experiments,Biometrics, 1966,22, 810–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. O., Baker, F. B., Mandeville, G. K., and Hays, T. F. Estimates of test size for several procedures based on conventional variance ratios in the repeated measure design.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danford, M. B., Hughes, H. M., & McNee, R. C. On the analysis of repeated-measurements experiments.Biometrics, 1960,16, 547–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington, E. S. A new tabulation of statistical procedures used in APA journals.American Psychologist, 1974,29, 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K. R., Putter, J., & Wax, Y. Simultaneous confidence intervals for product-type interaction contrasts.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1973,35, 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. An extension of Box's results on the use of theF distribution in multivariate analysis.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1958,29, 885–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graybill, F. Variance heterogeneity in a randomized block design.Biometrics, 1954,10, 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. The generalization of “Students ratio.”Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1931,2, 360–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H. Some approximate tests for repeated measures designs.Psychometrika, 1978,43, 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exactF distributions.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1970,65, 1582–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs.Journal of Educational Statistics, 1976,1, 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh, H., & Mandeville, G. K. Validity conditions in repeated measures designs.Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86, 964–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Edition 6. International Mathematical and Statistical Libraries, Inc., Houston, 1977.

  • Johnson, D. E. Some new multiple comparison procedures for the two-way AOV model with interaction.Biometrics, 1976,32, 929–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keselman, H. J., Rogan, J. C., Mendoza, J. L., & Breen, L. J. Testing the validity conditions of repeated measuresF tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1980,87, 479–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauchley, J. W. Significance test for sphericity of a normaln-variate distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1940,11, 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. E. Pairwise multiple comparisons in repeated measures designs.Journal of Educational Statistics, 1980,5, 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L., Toothaker, L. E., & Crain, B. R. Necessary and sufficient conditions forF ratios in theL ×J ×K factorial design with two repeated factors.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976,71, 992–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, J. L., Toothaker, L. E., & Nicewander, W. A. A Monte Carlo comparison of the univariate and multivariate methods for the groups by trials repeated measures design.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1974,9, 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudholkar, G. S., & Subbaiah, P. Unequal precision multiple comparisons for randomized block design under nonstandard conditions.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1976,71, 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. H. Exact Type I error rates for robustness of Student'st test with unequal variances.Journal of Educational Statistics, 1980,5, 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogan, J. C., Keselman, H. J., & Mendoza, J. L. Analysis of repeated measurements.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1979,32, 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouanet, H., & Lepine, D. Comparison between treatments in a repeated measures design: ANOVA and multivariate methods.The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1970,23, 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, S. N. On a heuristic method of test construction and its use in multivariate analysis.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1953,24, 220–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. A “mixed model” for the analysis of variance.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1956,27, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoloff, P. H. Correcting for heterogeneity of covariance for repeated measures designs of the analysis of variance.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1970,30, 909–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiku, M. L. Laguerre series forms of non-centralx 2 andF distributions.Biometrika, 1965,52, 415–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. S. Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance.Biometrika, 1932,24, 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. The sampling distributions of conventional, conservative and correctedF-ratios in repeated measurements designs with heterogeneity of covariance.Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1975,3, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B. J.Statistical Principles in experimental design (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Appreciation is extended to Milton Parnes for his insightful assistance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boik, R.J. A priori tests in repeated measures designs: Effects of nonsphericity. Psychometrika 46, 241–255 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293733

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02293733

Key words

Navigation