Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass in poplar plantations of different genotypes and stem spacings

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the productivity of poplar plantations, a field experiment of split-plot design with four tree spacings and three poplar clones was established, and four soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass were monitored in the trial. Soil enzyme activities, in most cases, were significantly higher in topsoil (0–10 cm) than in lower horizons (10–20 cm). Soil cellulase, catalase and protease activities during the growing season were higher than during the non-growing season, while invertase activity followed the opposite trend. Soil invertase, cellulase and catalase activities varied by poplar clone but soil protease activity did not. Cellulase and protease activities in the plantation at 5 × 5 m spacing were significantly higher than in the other spacings. The highest catalase activity was recorded at 6 × 6 m spacing. At the same planting density, invertase activity was greater in square spacings than in rectangular spacings. Soil microbial biomass was also significantly affected by seedling spacing and poplar clone. The mean soil MBC was significantly lower in topsoil than in the lower horizon, while MBN showed the opposite pattern. Significantly positive correlations were observed among soil cellulase, protease and catalase activities (p < 0.01), whereas soil invertase activity was negatively and significantly correlated with cellulase, protease and catalase activities (p < 0.01). Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities were not correlated except for a significantly negative correlation between soil MBC and catalase activities. Variations in soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass in different poplar plantations suggest that genotype and planting spacing should be considered when modeling soil nutrient dynamics and managing for long-term site productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison SD, Vitousek PM (2005) Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biol Biochem 37(5):937–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A (2002) Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann For Sci 59(3):233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobuľská L, Fazekašová D, Angelovičová L (2015) Vertical profiles of soil properties and microbial activities in peatbog soils in Slovakia. Environ Process 2(2):411–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Böhme L, Langer U, Böhme F (2005) Microbial biomass, enzyme activities and microbial community structure in two European long-term field experiments. Agr Ecosyst Environ 109:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolat İ (2014) The effect of thinning on microbial biomass C, N and basal respiration in black pine forest soils in Mudurnu, Turkey. Eur J For Res 133(1):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger JA, Kelting DL (1999) Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management. For Ecol Manag 122(1):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell BA (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49(6):637–644

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chodak M, Niklińska M (2010) Effect of texture and tree species on microbial properties of mine soils. Appl Soil Ecol 46(2):268–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran VL, Elliott LF, Lewis CE (1989) Soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity in subarctic agricultural and forest soils. Biol Fertil Soils 7(4):283–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criquet S, Farnet A, Tagger S, Le Petit J (2000) Annual variations of phenoloxidase activities in an evergreen oak litter: influence of certain biotic and abiotic factors. Soil Biol Biochem 32(11):1505–1513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Devi NB, Yadava PS (2006) Seasonal dynamics in soil microbial biomass C, N and P in a mixed-oak forest ecosystem of Manipur, Northeast India. Appl Soil Ecol 31(3):220–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Xie B, Zhang H (2007) Nitrogen dynamics and mineralization in degraded agricultural soil mulched with fresh grass. Plant Soil 300(1–2):269–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Xie B, Liu J (2008) Soil nutrient availability, poplar growth and biomass production on degraded agricultural soil under fresh grass mulch. For Ecol Manag 255(5):1802–1809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Liu J, Liu D, Xie B (2010) Enzymatic activity and nutrient availability in the rhizosphere of poplar plantations treated with fresh grass mulch. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 56(3):483–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S, Liu D, Tian Y, Deng S, Shang X (2013) Tree species composition influences enzyme activities and microbial biomass in the rhizosphere: a rhizobox approach. PLoS ONE 8(4):e61461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankeberger WT Jr, Johanson JB (1983) Method of measuring invertase activity in soils. Plant Soil 74(3):301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freppaz M, Said-Pullicino D, Filippa G, Curtaz F, Celi L, Zanini E (2014) Winter–spring transition induces changes in nutrients and microbial biomass in mid-alpine forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 78:54–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilenko EG, Susyan EA, Anan’eva ND, Makarov OA (2011) Spatial variability in the carbon of microbial biomass and microbial respiration in soils of the south of Moscow oblast. Eurasian Soil Sci 44(10):1125–1138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinojosa MB, Carreira JA, García-Ruíz R, Dick RP (2004) Soil moisture pre-treatment effects on enzyme activities as indicators of heavy metal-contaminated and reclaimed soils. Soil Biol Biochem 36(10):1559–1568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 5. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, Basel, pp 415–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen RG, Brookes PC (1990) Ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen measurements of microbial biomass in 0.5 m K2SO4 soil extracts. Soil Biol Biochem 22(8):1023–1027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joergensen RG, Anderson TH, Wolters V (1995) Carbon and nitrogen relationships in the microbial biomass of soils in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests. Biol Fertil Soils 19(2–3):141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama A, Wallenstein MD, Simpson RT, Moore JC (2013) Carbon-degrading enzyme activities stimulated by increased nutrient availability in arctic tundra soils. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li G, Liu Y, Gan J, Guo B, Xu Y (2008) Seasonal response of soil enzyme activity to thinning intensity of aerial seeded Pinus tabulaeformis stands. Front For Chin 3(3):286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Fang S, Tian Y, Dun X (2012) Variation in rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species on seasonal flooding land: an in situ rhizobox approach. Appl Soil Ecol 59:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Fang S, Tian Y, Dun X (2014) Seasonal and clonal variations of microbial biomass and processes in the rhizosphere of poplar plantations. Appl Soil Ecol 78(6):65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü Y, Wang C, Wang F, Zhao G, Pu G, Ma X, Tian X (2013) Effects of nitrogen addition on litter decomposition, soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activities between leguminous and non-leguminous forests. Ecol Res 28(5):793–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puissant J, Cécillon L, Mills RTE et al (2015) Seasonal influence of climate manipulation on microbial community structure and function in mountain soils. Soil Biol Biochem 80:296–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raiesi F, Riahi M (2014) The influence of grazing exclosure on soil C stocks and dynamics, and ecological indicators in upland arid and semi-arid rangelands. Ecol Indic 41:145–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberge MR (1978) Methodology of enzymes determination and extraction. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, New York, pp 341–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt IK, Jonasson S, Michelsen A (1999) Mineralization and microbial immobilization of N and P in arctic soils in relation to season, temperature and nutrient amendment. Appl Soil Ecol 11(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senga Y, Hiroki M, Nakamura Y, Watarai Y, Watanabe Y, Nohara S (2011) Vertical profiles of DIN, DOC, and microbial activities in the wetland soil of Kushiro Mire, northeastern Japan. Limnology 12(1):17–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL (2010) Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 42(3):391–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo ME, Lauber C, Waldrop MP, Zak DR (2005) Extracellular enzyme activities and soil organic matter dynamics for northern hardwood forests receiving simulated nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry 75(2):201–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JL, Paul EA (1990) The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations. In: Bollag JM, Stotzky G (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 6. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 357–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS, Smith S, Tabatabai MA, Wollum A (eds) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties of soils. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 775–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang YZ, Wei CF, Yan TM, Yang LZ, Ci E (2007) Biological indicator of soil quality: a review. Soils 39(2):157–163

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Cao F, Wang G (2013) Soil microbiological properties and enzyme activity in Ginkgo–tea agroforestry compared with monoculture. Agrofor Syst 87(5):1201–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi S, Chakraborty A, Chakrabarti K, Bandyopadhyay BK (2007) Enzyme activities and microbial biomass in coastal soils of India. Soil Biol Biochem 39(11):2840–2848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan S, Senthurpandian VK (2006) Comparison of enzyme activity with depth under tea plantations and forested sites in south India. Geoderma 137(1):212–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallenstein MD, McMahon SK, Schimel JP (2009) Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Glob Change Biol 15(7):1631–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Xiao F, He T, Wang S (2013a) Responses of labile soil organic carbon and enzyme activity in mineral soils to forest conversion in the subtropics. Ann For Sci 70(6):579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Lü Y, Wang L, Liu X, Tian X (2013b) Insights into seasonal variation of litter decomposition and related soil degradative enzyme activities in subtropical forest in China. J For Res 24(4):683–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Fang S, Chang SX, Tian Y (2014) Non-additive effects of litter-mixing on soil carbon dioxide efflux from poplar-based agroforestry systems in the warm temperate region of China. Agrofor Syst 88(2):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1998) Controls of temporal variability of the soil microbial biomass: a global-scale synthesis. Soil Biol Biochem 30(13):1627–1637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan M, Xu T, Song P, Dai J (2012) Effects of different cropping patterns of soybean and maize seedlings on soil enzyme activities and MBC and MBN. J Northeast Agric Univ (Engl Ed) 19(4):42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan Y, Fang S, Tian Y, Deng S, Tang L, Chuong DN (2015) Influence of tree spacing on soil nitrogen mineralization and availability in hybrid poplar plantations. Forests 6(3):636–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Tang J, Chen X, Hu S (2007) Effects of coexisting plant species on soil microbes and soil enzymes in metal lead contaminated soils. Appl Soil Ecol 37(3):240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Liu G, Xue S, Song Z (2011) Rhizosphere soil microbial activity under different vegetation types on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 161(3–4):115–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengzuo Fang.

Additional information

Project funding: This work was funded by the National Key Technology R&D Program (2015BAD09B0203) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB416904), as well as by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Zhang, L., Fang, S. et al. Variation of soil enzyme activity and microbial biomass in poplar plantations of different genotypes and stem spacings. J. For. Res. 29, 963–972 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0524-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0524-2

Keywords

Navigation