Abstract
This work concurrently investigates the microstructure evolution and stress state during continuous cooling of 1045 steel gear parts. A finite element algorithm was developed by two-way coupling of microstructural and thermal fields. Thermal coefficients were correlated to microstructural evolution, and a phase transformation kinetics model was considered to be both temperature and time dependent. Magee's rule was chosen for martensitic transformation modeling to incorporate the effect of stress state on microstructural field. The dilation curves for the benchmark sample show that martensite starting temperature increases when the stress state is considered in microstructure modeling. To determine the validity of the presented model, a cylindrical specimen was quenched in water and oil media, and their predicted microstructures were compared with experimental results. A reasonable harmony between simulated and experimental results was observed. The simulation was then performed for internal gear parts quenched in oil and water media. The simultaneous monitoring of microstructure and stress evolution during continuous cooling of an internal gear part was conducted. It was shown that simultaneous and separate transformations occurring between the tooth and root region have a determining role in the sign of stress for internal gear parts. Lastly, based on monitoring of different phase transformation scenarios occurring during water and oil quenching, a hybrid quenching was proposed to increase martensite volume fraction at the tooth region of an oil-quenched sample without altering the microstructure at root region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gurmeet Singh, Materials Today: Proceedings 2020.
W. Zhang, Z. Dong, H. Kang, C. Yang, and X. Peng: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2021, vol. 288, p. 116907.
L. Chang, K. Mukahiwa, J. Duff, M.G. Burke, and F. Scenini: Scripta Mater., 2021, vol. 195, p. 113742.
X. Wang, C.H. Zhang, X. Cui, S. Zhang, J. Chen, and J.B. Zhang: Vacuum., 2020, vol. 175, p. 109216.
Z. Wang, K. Wang, Y. Liu, B. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and S. Li: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, vol. 269, pp. 150–62.
W.P. de Oliveira, M.A. Savi, P.M.C.L. Pacheco, and L.F.G. de Souza: Mech. Mater., 2010, vol. 42, pp. 31–43.
M. Jung, M. Kang, and Y.-K. Lee: Acta Mater., 2012, vol. 60, pp. 525–36.
D.W. Kim, H.H. Cho, W.B. Lee, K.T. Cho, Y.G. Cho, S.J. Kim, and H.N. Han: Mater. Design., 2016, vol. 99, pp. 243–53.
W.A. Johnson and R.F. Mehl: Trans. AIME., 1939, vol. 135, pp. 416–58.
M. Avrami: J. Chem. Phys., 1940, vol. 8, pp. 212–24.
E. Scheil: Archiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen., 1935, vol. 8, pp. 565–7.
M.V. Li, D.V. Niebuhr, L.L. Meekisho, and D.G. Atteridge: Metall. Mater. Trans. B., 1998, vol. 29B, pp. 661–72.
Ø. Grong and H.R. Shercliff: Prog. Mater Sci., 2002, vol. 47, pp. 163–282.
M. Lusk, W. Wang, X. Sun and Y.-K. Lee (2003).
S.-J. Lee, E.J. Pavlina, and C.J. Van Tyne: Mater. Sci. Eng., A., 2010, vol. 527, pp. 3186–94.
M. Pietrzyk and R. Kuziak: Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 2011, vol. 11, pp. 707–22.
P.R. Woodard, S. Chandrasekar, and H.T.Y. Yang: Metall. Mater. Trans. B., 1999, vol. 30B, p. 815.
S.H. Kang and Y.T. Im: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2007, vol. 192–193, pp. 381–90.
P.G.K. Amos, E. Schoof, N. Streichan, D. Schneider, and B. Nestler: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2019, vol. 159, pp. 281–96.
O. Seppälä, A. Pohjonen, A. Kaijalainen, J. Larkiola, and D. Porter: Proc. Manuf., 2018, vol. 15, pp. 1856–63.
B. Su, Q. Ma, and Z. Han: Steel Res. Int., 2017, vol. 88, p. 1600490.
D. An, S. Pan, Q. Yu, C. Lin, T. Dai, B.W. Krakauer, and M. Zhu: IOP Conf. Ser., 2015, vol. 84, p. 012045.
Y.J. Lan, D.Z. Li, and Y.Y. Li: Acta Mater., 2004, vol. 52, pp. 1721–9.
Y.-N. Guo, Y.-T. Li, W.-Y. Tian, H.-P. Qi, and H.-H. Yan: Chin. J. Mech. Eng., 2018, vol. 31, p. 85.
S.-H. Kang and Y.-T. Im: Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2007, vol. 49, pp. 423–39.
G.E. Totten: Handbook of Residual Stress and Deformation of Steel, ASM International, Almere, 2002.
M. Avrami: J. Chem. Phys., 1939, vol. 7, pp. 1103–12.
M. Eshraghi-Kakhki, M.A. Golozar, and A. Kermanpur: Mater. Des., 2011, vol. 32, pp. 2870–7.
D.P. Koistinen and R.E. Marburger: Acta Metall., 1959, vol. 7, pp. 59–60.
C.L. Magee, Phase transformations. 1970.
J. Sun, J. Hensel, J. Klassen, T. Nitschke-Pagel, and K. Dilger: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, vol. 265, pp. 173–84.
L. S. Darken, R. W. Gurry and M. B. Bever, 1953.
M. Eshraghi-Kakhki, A. Kermanpur, and M.A. Golozar: Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, vol. 28, pp. 197–204.
ASTMA1033-18, (ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018).
P. Carlone, G.S. Palazzo, and R. Pasquino: Comput. Math. Appl., 2010, vol. 59, pp. 585–94.
Acknowledgments
This paper and the research behind it would not have been possible without the exceptional support of Dr. Azadeh Shojaee, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Her matchless enthusiasm, unwavering work dedication, comprehensive knowledge and expertise have been an inspiration and kept my work on track from my first encounter with the countless unemotional lines of simulation codes. The author also thanks Prof. Antoine Allanore, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the editor of Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, for the review’s speed and comments, which strengthened the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Manuscript submitted March 28, 2021, accepted September 15, 2021.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Esfahani, A.K. Numerical Simulation of Heat Treatment Process by Incorporating Stress State on Martensitic Transformation to Investigate Microstructure and Stress State of 1045 Steel Gear Parts. Metall Mater Trans B 52, 4109–4129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02332-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-021-02332-1