Abstract
In an effort to establish a universal model to predict the mechanical properties from processing conditions, tensile tests have been conducted of four single-structure steels, namely, ferrite, pearlite, bainite, and martensite; the data obtained were analyzed in terms of the Ludwik, Hollomon, and Swift equations to characterize their work-hardening behavior. It was found that the differential Crussard-Jaoul (C-J) analysis, based on the Ludwik equation, can describe the work-hardening behavior of these steels fairly well.
The differential C-J analysis has shown that the ferrite and pearlite steels deform with two stages of work hardening, each stage associated with a distinctive value of the work-hardening exponent n. Martensitic steels exhibit single-stage work hardening. In bainite, the behavior was found to be dependent on transformation temperature; upper and lower bainite exhibit a behavior similar to pearlitic steels and quenched martensite, respectively. This can be well understood in terms of the similarity of the corresponding microstructures.
On the basis of these results, the work-hardening behavior of single-structure steels falls into four categories, according to the n value. This classification may serve as a useful guide to predict the flow behavior of steels with a known microstructure or to judge the microstructure merely by stress-strain curves, without microstructural observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P.D. Hodgson and R.K. Gibbs: Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. Int., 1992, vol. 32, pp. 1329–38.
P.C. Campbell, E.B. Hawbolt, and J.K. Brimacombe: Metall. Trans. A, 1991, vol. 22A, p. 239.
F.B. Pickering: Towards Improved Toughness and Ductility, Climax Molybdenum Co. Symp., Kyoto, 1971, Climax Molybdenum Co., p. 9.
T. Gladman, B. Holmes, and F.B. Pickering: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1970, vol. 208, pp. 172–83.
W.B. Morrison: Trans. ASM, 1966, vol. 59, pp. 824–46.
A.R. Marder and B.L. Bramfitt: Metall. Trans. A, 1976, vol. 7A, pp. 365–72.
W. Heller: Rail Steels, ASTM STP 644, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1978, p. 162.
R.W.K. Honeycombe and F.B. Pickering: Metall. Trans., 1972, vol. 3, pp. 1099–1112.
P. Brozzo, G. Buzzichelli, A. Mascanzoni, and M. Mirabile: Met. Sci., 1977, vol. 11, pp. 123–29.
F.B. Pickering: Physical Metallurgy and the Design of Steels, Applied Science Publishers Ltd., Barking, Essex, United Kingdom, 1978.
T. Kunitake: Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn., 1967, vol. 7, pp. 254–62.
D.W. Smith and R.F. Hehemann: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1971, vol. 209, pp. 476–81.
P. Ludwik: Elemente der Technolnischen Mechanick, Verlag von Julius Springen, Berlin, 1909, p. 32.
J.H. Hollomon: Trans. AIME, 1945, vol. 162, pp. 268–90.
E. Voce: J. Inst. Met., 1948, vol. 74, pp. 537–62.
H.W. Swift: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1952, vol. 1. pp. 1–18.
C. Crussard: Rev. Metallurgie, 1950, vol. 47, pp. 589–600.
B. Jaoul: J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1957, vol. 5, pp. 95–114.
S.N. Monteiro and R.E. Reed-Hill: Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2947–48.
D.K. Matlock, F. Zia-Ebrahimi, and G. Krauss: Deformation, Processing and Structure, ASM Materials Science Seminar, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1982, pp. 47–87.
L.F. Ramos, D.K. Matlock, and G. Krauss: Metall. Trans. A, 1979, vol. 10A, pp. 259–61.
M.S. Nagorka, G. Krauss, and D.K. Matlock: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1987, vol. 94, pp. 183–93.
Y. Tomita and K. Okabayashi: Metall. Trans., 1985, vol. 16A, pp. 865–72.
Z. Jiang, J. Lian, and J. Chen: Mater. Sci. Technol., 1992, vol. 8, pp. 1075–81.
R.E. Reed-Hill, W.R. Cribb, and S.N. Monteiro: Metall. Trans., 1973, vol. 4, pp. 2665–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Umemoto, M., Tsuchiya, K., Liu, Z.G. et al. Tensile stress-strain analysis of single-structure steels. Metall Mater Trans A 31, 1785–1794 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0249-x
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-006-0249-x