Skip to main content
Log in

Hip fractures in young adults: a retrospective cross-sectional study of characteristics, injury mechanism, risk factors, complications and follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

This study characterises risk factors, complications and follow-up of minimal trauma hip fractures in young adults, adding to limited information examining the management framework. This group have severe systemic disease and significant risk of post-operative complications and subsequent fractures. Improved medical referral pathways enable management of osteoporosis and comorbid diseases.

Aims

There is a paucity of literature examining minimal trauma hip fractures in young adults, despite extensive management guidelines for older patients. This study aims to characterise risk factors, complications and follow-up of hip fractures to guide management pathways.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients presenting with hip fracture to a single institution from 2009 to 2015. Hip fractures were identified using ICD-10 codes and clinical information documented from medical records. Patients were categorised into minimal trauma (MTF) and high-energy fracture (HEF) groups based on mechanism of injury.

Results

Of 2512 patients admitted with hip fracture, 2.5% (n = 62) were aged 15–49 years. Two patients were excluded with pathological fractures, and seven were excluded with no recorded mechanism of injury. MTF occurred in 43 patients and 10 sustained HEF. These groups had similar demographics, fracture locations and treatments. The MTF group had higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists scores (MTF 2.44 ± 0.9; HEF 1.43 ± 0.5; p = 0.025) and higher rates of chronic endocrine disease (MTF 34.9%; HEF 0%; p = 0.046). Rates of post-operative surgical (MTF 24.0%; HEF 12.5%) and medical complications (MTF 27.8%; HEF 12.5%) were high in MTF patients. Subsequent fractures occurred in five (13.9%) MTF patients during the study period compared with none in the HEF group. Only 16 (44.4%) of the MTF patients were referred to endocrine care.

Conclusion

Young adults with MTF of the hip have more severe systemic disease and are at risk of post-operative complications and subsequent fractures. Referral of patients to endocrine care is recommended to manage osteoporosis and comorbid diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chipchase LS, McCaul K, Hearn TC (2000) Hip fracture rates in South Australia: into the next century. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery 70(2):117–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin JC, Wu CC, Lo C, Liang WM, Cheng CF, Wang CB et al (2014) Mortality and complications of hip fracture in young adults: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:362

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong PK, Spencer DG, McElduff P, Manolios N, Larcos G, Howe GB (2003) Secondary screening for osteoporosis in patients admitted with minimal-trauma fracture to a major teaching hospital. Intern Med J 33(11):505–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M (2000) Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970-1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int 11(5):443–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkins CH, Birge SJ (2005) Prevention of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly. Am J Med 118(11):1190–1195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C, Johansson H, Johnell O, Jonsson B et al (2005) Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 16(6):581–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zetterberg CH, Irstam L, Andersson GBJ (1982) Femoral neck fractures in young adults. Acta Orthop Scand 53(3):427–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Christie J (1995) Hip fractures in adults younger than 50 years of age. Epidemiology and results Clin Orthop Relat Res 312:238–246

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Ani AN, Neander G, Samuelsson B, Blomfeldt R, Ekstrom W, Hedstrom M (2013) Risk factors for osteoporosis are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures regardless of trauma mechanism. Acta Orthop 84(1):54–59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pasoto SG, Yoshihara LA, Maeda LC, Bernik MM, Lotufo PA, Bonfa E et al (2012) Osteoporotic hip fractures in non-elderly patients: relevance of associated co-morbidities. Rheumatol Int 32(10):3149–3153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lofthus CM, Osnes EK, Meyer HE, Kristiansen IS, Nordsletten L, Falch JA (2006) Young patients with hip fracture: a population-based study of bone mass and risk factors for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17(11):1666–1672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boden SD, Labropoulos P, Saunders R (1990) Hip fractures in young patients: is this early osteoporosis? Calcif Tissue Int 46(2):65–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49(4):239–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrari S, Bianchi ML, Eisman JA, Foldes AJ, Adami S, Wahl DA et al (2012) Osteoporosis in young adults: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 23(12):2735–2748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khosla S, Lufkin EG, Hodgson SF, Fitzpatrick LA, Melton LJ III (1994) Epidemiology and clinical features of osteoporosis in young individuals. Bone 15(5):551–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lauritzen JB, McNair PA, Lund B (1993) Risk factors for hip fractures. A review. Dan Med Bull 40(4):479–485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV (1998) Risk factors in osteoporosis. Maturitas 30(3):229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cizza G, Primma S, Csako G (2009) Depression as a risk factor for osteoporosis. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM 20(8):367–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kishimoto T, De Hert M, Carlson HE, Manu P, Correll CU (2012) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in people with schizophrenia. Current opinion in psychiatry 25(5):415–429

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper C, Coupland C, Mitchell M (1995) Rheumatoid arthritis, corticosteroid therapy and hip fracture. Ann Rheum Dis 54(1):49–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Daabiss M (2011) American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth 55(2):111–115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia AE, Bonnaig JV, Yoneda ZT, Richards JE, Ehrenfeld JM, Obremskey WT et al (2012) Patient variables which may predict length of stay and hospital costs in elderly patients with hip fracture. J Orthop Trauma 26(11):620–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Wang.

Additional information

Michael T. Wang and Sarah H. Yao are equal first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, M.T., Yao, S.H., Wong, P. et al. Hip fractures in young adults: a retrospective cross-sectional study of characteristics, injury mechanism, risk factors, complications and follow-up. Arch Osteoporos 12, 46 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0339-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0339-y

Keywords

Navigation