Skip to main content
Log in

Compensation for forest ecological services in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Forestry Studies in China

Abstract

The paper discusses methods to compensate for the costs incurred in the supply of forest ecological services (FES), i.e. government dominated and market-based instruments as well as progress made so far in China. Factors which constrain the supply of these services and potential policy improvements are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aylward B. 1999. Direct payment, transfers and markets for environmental services. A paper for FAO. Cape Town

  • Chen G C. 2002. Development of China’s ecological compensation scheme. In: CCIED (ed.), Task Force on Forests and Grasslands Workshop on Payment Schemes for Environmental Services. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase R H. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3: 1–44 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2005. State of the World’s Forests. Rome

  • Johnson N, White A, Perrot-Maitre D. 2003. Developing markets for water services from forests: issues and lessons for innovators. Website: http://www.forest-trends.org/

  • Kengen S. 1996, Forestry valuation—purpose, context and process. Andre Mayer Research Fellowship Draft Report, FAO. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Landell-Mills N, Bishop J, Porras I. 2001. Silver bullet or fools’ gold—a global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impacts for the poor. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Ma T L, Xu Q, Zhu Q Z. 2000. Community Forestry Development and Poverty Reduction Institutional Arrangement and Case Study. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C. 2005. The Institutional performance of Community Forestry and Poverty Reduction. Beijing: Economic Science Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce C, Pearce D, Palmer C. 2002. Valuing the Environment in Developing Countries: Case Studies. Cheltonham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou A C. 1938. The Economics of Welfare (Chinese Translation). Beijing: Chinese Social Science Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid A A. 2004. Conflict and Cooperation. Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • State Environment Protection Administration and Ministry of Education. 1998. National Public Awareness Survey. Beijing: China Environmental Science Publishing House (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • State Forestry Administration. China Forestry Yearbook of 1998–2004, Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Houses

  • Task Group for Forestry Reform and Development in Collective Forest Regions. 2002. Forestry Reform and Development in Collective Forest Regions. Beijing: China’s Forestry Publishing House (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • The Ministry of Forestry, PRC. China Forestry Yearbooks of 1949–1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing Houses (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Can.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, C., Wang, S., Zhang, W. et al. Compensation for forest ecological services in China. For. Stud. China 9, 68–79 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-007-0012-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-007-0012-4

Key words

Navigation