Abstract
This study empirically analyzes the impact of the diversity of three channel types (the information search, technology acquisition, and collaboration channels) on four types of innovation (service, process, organization, and marketing) performance using data from a sample of service firms of the Korean innovation survey. The results of this study indicate that innovative service firms tend to rely heavily on the diversity of information search channels for all four types of innovation performance, while their reliance on the diversity of the technology acquisition channel and collaboration channel is considerably low. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of channel management strategies for better service performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahuja G, Katila R (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study. Strategic Manag J 22(3):197–220
Akehurst G (2008) What do we really know about services? Serv Bus 2(1):1–15
Allison PD (1999) Multiple regression: a primer. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
Amara N, Landry R (2005) Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey. Technovation 25(3):245–259
Arundel A (2001) The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Res Policy 30(4):611–624
Becker W, Dietz J (2004) R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms–evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Res Policy 33(2):209–223
Berry LL, Shankar V, Parish JT, Cadwallader S, Dotzel T (2006) Creating new markets through service innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 47(2):56
Bin G (2008) Technology acquisition channels and industry performance: an industry-level analysis of Chinese large- and medium-size manufacturing enterprises. Res Policy 37(2):194–209
Bower JL, Christensen CM (1995) Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harv Bus Rev 73:43–53
Brown S, Eisenhardt K (1995) Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad Manag Rev 20(2):343–378
Bullinger HJ, Auernhammer K, Gomeringer A (2004) Managing innovation networks in the knowledge-driven economy. Int J Prod Res 42(17):3337–3353
Caloghirou Y, Kastelli I, Tsakanikas A (2004) Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? Technovation 24(1):29–39
Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Chong YT, Chen CH (2010) Management and forecast of dynamic customer needs: an artificial immune and neural system approach. Adv Eng Inform 24(1):96–106
Christensen JF, Olesen MH, Kjær JS (2005) The industrial dynamics of open innovation: evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics. Res Policy 34(10):1533–1549
Chung S, Kim G (2003) Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier’s standpoint. Res Policy 32(4):587–603
Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin Sci Quart 35(1):128–152
Crevani L, Palm K, Schilling A (2011) Innovation management in service firms: a research agenda. Serv Bus 5(2):177–193
Daghfous A (2004) Absorptive capacity and the implementation of knowledge-intensive best practices. SAM Adv Manag J 69:21–27
Drejer I, Jørgensen B (2005) The dynamic creation of knowledge: analysing public-private collaborations. Technovation 25(2):83–94
Faems D, Van Looy B, Debackere K (2005) Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. J Prod Innovat Manag 22(3):238–250
Frenz M, Ietto-Gillies G (2009) The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: evidence from the UK community innovation survey. Res Policy 38(7):1125–1135
Griliches Z (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J Econ 10(1):92–116
Hagedoorn J (1993) Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Manag J 14(5):371–385
Huang F, Rice J (2009) The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating “open innovation” outcomes: a study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector. Int J Innov Manag 13(2):201–220
Jeon S, Park SR, Digman LA (2008) Strategic implications of the open-market paradigm under digital convergence: the case of small business C2C. Serv Bus 2(4):321–334
Jones G (2001) Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition. J Bus Venturing 16(3):255–283
Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manag J 45(6):1183–1194
Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Manag J 27(2):131–150
Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology based ventures. Strategic Manag J 22(6–7):615–640
Massa S, Testa S (2008) Innovation and SMEs: misaligned perspectives and goals among entrepreneurs, academics, and policy makers. Technovation 28(7):393–407
Mas-Verdú F (2007) Services and innovation systems: European models of technology centres. Serv Bus 1(1):7–23
Mas-Verdú F, Wensley A, Alba M, García Álvarez-Coque JM (2011) How much does KIBS contribute to the generation and diffusion of innovation? Serv Bus 1–18. Online first doi:10.1007/s11628-011-0110-1
Morone P, Testa G (2008) Firms growth, size and innovation an investigation into the Italian manufacturing sector. Econ Innov New Tech 17(4):311–329
Nieto M, Santamaria L (2007) The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27(6–7):367–377
OECD (2005) Oslo Manual-guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Eurostat, Luxembourg
Pianta M (2004) Innovation and employment. In: The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Powell WW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav 12:295–336
Redondo-Cano A, Canet-Giner MT (2010) Outsourcing agrochemical services: economic or strategic logic? Serv Bus 4(3–4):237–252
Rogers M (2004) Networks, firm size and innovation. Small Bus Econ 22(2):141–153
Roofthooft W (2010) Customer equity: a creative tool for SMEs in the services industry: how small and medium enterprises can win the battle for innovation. Serv Bus 4(1):37–48
Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Manag J 22(4):287–306
Rothwell R (1994) Issues in user-producer relations in the innovation process: the role of government. Int J Tech Manag 5(6):629–649
Tripsas M (1997) Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Manag J 18(1):119–142
Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad Manag J 44(5):996–1004
Tsai K, Wang J (2008) External technology acquisition and firm performance: a longitudinal study. J Bus Venturing 23(1):91–112
Tsai K, Wang J (2009) External technology sourcing and innovation performance in LMT sectors: an analysis based on the Taiwanese technological innovation survey. Res Policy 38(3):518–526
Uriona-Maldonado M, de Souza LLC, Varvakis G (2010) Focus on practice service process innovation in the Brazilian electric energy sector. Serv Bus 4(1):77–88
Van De Vrande V, de Jong J, Vanhaverbeke W, de Rochemont M (2009) Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation 29(6–7):423–437
Varis M, Littunen H (2010) Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. Eur J Innov Manag 13(2):128–154
Veugelers R, Cassiman B (1999) Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Res Policy 28(1):63–80
Weiber R, Kollmann T (1998) Competitive advantages in virtual markets-perspectives of “information-based marketing” in cyberspace. Eur J Mark 32(7/8):603–615
Wolfl A (2005) The service economy in OECD countries. In enhancing the performance of the services sector. OECD Publications, Paris, pp 27–62
Zeng SX, Xie X, Tam C (2010) Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation 30(3):181–194
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (327-2010-1-B00286).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 6.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, I., Park, H. & Choi, J. The impact of diversity of innovation channels on innovation performance in service firms. Serv Bus 5, 277–294 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0114-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-011-0114-x