Summary
The temporary immersion bioreactor has been found to be an important tool for sugarcane micropropagation, allowing higher shoot formation rates and cost reduction. This research was conducted to demonstrate the agricultural value of temporary immersion bioreactor-derived sugarcane plants. The experiment was carried out for about 2 yr to study the field performance of these plants. Two control treatments were also evaluated representing the conventional forms of micro- and macropropagation. Growth of sugarcane stools, first ratoon and the use of micropropagated plants for macropropagation were recorded. Some botanical and chemical characteristics were evaluated. Differences among propagation systems were only found in the first 6 mo. of field growth, regarding the stem length and diameter. Such differences disappeared with the course of the experiment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Debergh, P. Effects of agar brand and concentration on the tissue culture medium. Physiol. Plant. 59:270–276; 1983.
Escalona, M.; Lorenzo, J. C.; González, B.; Daquinta, M.; Borroto, C.; González, J. L.; Desjardins, Y. Pineapple micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep. 18:743–748; 1999.
Espinosa A.; Bombino, P.; Gómez, J.; Ojeda, E. La propagación por yemas aisladas, una realidad en la agricultura cañera cubana. Libro de Resúmenes de Medio Siglo de Investigaciones Cañeras en Cuba; 1997: 84 pp.
Feldmann, P.; Sapotille, J.; Gredoire, P.; Rott, P. Micropropagation of sugarcane. In: Teisson, C., ed. In vitro culture of tropical plants. France: CIRAD; 1994:15–17.
Flynn, L.; Anderlini, T.. Disease incidence and yield performance of tissue culture-generated seed cane over the crop cycle in Lousiana J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 10:113; 1990.
Gawel, N.; Robacker, C. Somatic embryogenesis in two Gossypium hirsutum genotypes on semi-solid versus liquid proliferation media. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 23:201–204; 1990.
Harris, R.; Mason, E. Two machines for in vitro propagation of plants in liquid media. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:311–316; 1983.
Heinz, D. J.; Mee, G. Plant differentiation from callus tissue of Saccharum species. Crop Sci. 9:346–348; 1969.
Jackson, W.; Wagnespack, H.; Richard, C.; Garrison, D.; Lester, W. CP-65-357 Kleentek test in Lousiana. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol 21:10–13; 1990.
Jiménez, E.; Pérez, J.; Gil, V.; Herrera, J.; García, Y.; Alfonso, E. Sistema para la propagación de la caña de azúcar. In: Estrada, M.; Riego, E.; Limonta, E.; Tellez, P.; Fuente, J., eds. Advances en biotecnología moderna. Cuba: Elfos Scientiae.; 1995:11.2.
Kozai, T.; Jeong, B.; Kubota, C.; Murai, Y. Effects of volume and initial strength of medium on the growth, photosynthesis and ion uptake of potato plantlets in vitro. J. Jap. Soc. Hort 64:63–71; 1995.
Lorenzo, J. C.; González, B.; Escalona, M.; Teisson, C.; Espinosa, P.; Borroto, C. Sugarcane shoot formation in an improved temporary immersion system. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 54:197–200; 1998.
Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:473–479; 1962.
Palmera, F.; Carnaúba, G.; Santana, I.; Nodarse, O. Evaluación preliminar de la micropropagación de la caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en el Estado de Alagoas—Brasil. Libro de Resúmenes de Medio Siglo de Investigaciones Cañeras en Cuba; 1997: 53 pp.
Peña, M.; Stay, M. Ventajas de la propagación in vitro. Cañaveral 3:24; 1997.
Pérez, J. N.; Jiménez, E.; Gómez, R. Mejora genética de la caña de azúcar mediante la inducción de mutaciones y la selección, in vitro. In: Arencibia, A.; Cornide, M. T., eds. Biodiversidad y biotecnología de la caña de azúcar. Cuba: Elfos Scientiae; 1999:79–92.
Skidmore, D.; Simon, A.; Bidis, A.. In vitro culture of shoots of Pinus caribaea on a liquid medium. Plant Cell Tiss., Organ Cult. 14:129–136; 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lorenzo, J.C., Ojeda, E., Espinosa, A. et al. Field performance of temporary immersion bioreactor-derived sugarcane plants. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 37, 803–806 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0133-8
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0133-8