Abstract
Prior to differentiation, embryonic stem (ES) cells in culture are maintained in a so-called “undifferentiated” state, allowing derivation of multiple downstream cell lineages when induced in a directed manner, which in turn grants these cells their “pluripotent” state. The current work is based on a simple observation that the initial culture condition for maintaining mouse ES cells in an “undifferentiated” state does impact on the differentiation propensity of these cells, in this case to a neuronal fate. We point out the importance in judging the “pluripotency” of a given stem cell culture, as this clearly demonstrated that the “undifferentiated” state of these cells is not necessarily a “pluripotent” state, even for a widely used mouse ES cell line. We partly attribute this difference in the initial value of ES cells to the naïve-to-primed status of pluripotency, which in turn may affect early events of the differentiation in vitro.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouhon I. A.; Joannides A.; Kato H.; Chandran S.; Allen N. D. Embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors display temporal restriction to neural patterning. Stem Cells 24: 1908–1913; 2006.
Bouhon I. A.; Kato H.; Chandran S.; Allen N. D. Neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells in chemically defined medium. Brain Res. Bull. 68: 62–75; 2005.
Chang C.; Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Cell fate determination in embryonic ectoderm. J. Neurobiol. 36: 128–151; 1998.
Chen G.; Gulbranson D. R.; Hou Z.; Bolin J. M.; Ruotti V.; Probasco M. D.; Smuga-Otto K.; Howden S. E.; Diol N. R.; Propson N. E.; Wagner R.; Lee G. O.; Antosiewicz-Bourget J.; Teng J. M.; Thomson J. A. Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat. Methods 8: 424–429; 2011.
Furue M.; Okamoto T.; Hayashi Y.; Okochi H.; Fujimoto M.; Myoishi Y.; Abe T.; Ohnuma K.; Sato G. H.; Asashima M.; Sato J. D. Leukemia inhibitory factor as an anti-apoptotic mitogen for pluripotent mouse embryonic stem cells in a serum-free medium without feeder cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 41: 19–28; 2005.
Hanna J.; Markoulaki S.; Mitalipova M.; Cheng A. W.; Cassady J. P.; Staerk J.; Carey B. W.; Lengner C. J.; Foreman R.; Love J.; Gao Q.; Kim J.; Jaenisch R. Metastable pluripotent states in NOD-mouse-derived ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 4: 513–524; 2009.
Hemmati-Brivanlou A.; Melton D. Vertebrate neural induction. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20: 43–60; 1997.
Hirai H.; Karian P.; Kikyo N. Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency by leukaemia inhibitory factor. Biochem. J. 438: 11–23; 2011.
Kim J.; Chu J.; Shen X.; Wang J.; Orkin S. H. An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 132: 1049–1061; 2008.
Lu C. C.; Brennan J.; Robertson E. J. From fertilization to gastrulation: axis formation in the mouse embryo. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11: 384–392; 2001.
Matsuda T.; Nakamura T.; Nakao K.; Arai T.; Katsuki M.; Heike T.; Yokota T. STAT3 activation is sufficient to maintain an undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO J. 18: 4261–4269; 1999.
Nichols J.; Smith A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4: 487–492; 2009.
Pelton T. A.; Sharma S.; Schulz T. C.; Rathjen J.; Rathjen P. D. Transient pluripotent cell populations during primitive ectoderm formation: correlation of in vivo and in vitro pluripotent cell development. J. Cell Sci. 115: 329–339; 2002.
Stadtfeld M.; Apostolou E.; Akutsu H.; Fukuda A.; Follett P.; Natesan S.; Kono T.; Shioda T.; Hochedlinger K. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 465: 175–181; 2010.
Suzuki O.; Matsuda J.; Takano K.; Yamamoto Y.; Asano T.; Naiki M.; Kusanagi M. Effect of genetic background on establishment of mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp. Anim. 48: 213–216; 1999.
Tsuji Y.; Yoshimura N.; Aoki H.; Sharov A. A.; Ko M. S.; Motohashi T.; Kunisada T. Maintenance of undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem cells in suspension by the serum- and feeder-free defined culture condition. Dev. Dyn. 237: 2129–2138; 2008.
Ying Q. L.; Wray J.; Nichols J.; Batlle-Morera L.; Doble B.; Woodgett J.; Cohen P.; Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453: 519–523; 2008.
Acknowledgments
H. K. thanks Nick Allen for sharing unpublished data related to the neural differentiation protocol and for the long-term friendship. We all thank Yosuke Moriyama for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (KAKENHI 23111008) awarded to H. K.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editor: T. Okamoto
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hirose, H., Kato, H., Kikuchi-Taura, A. et al. Mouse ES cells maintained in different pluripotency-promoting conditions differ in their neural differentiation propensity. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal 48, 143–148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-012-9486-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-012-9486-z