Skip to main content
Log in

Patronage and Power: Russia’s Dominant Party Regime

  • Kommentar
  • Published:
Politische Vierteljahresschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Following the election cycle of 2007–2008, Russia prepares to enter a phase marked by a change of presidents but continuity in the model of legislative-executive relations that was established under Vladimir Putin. During Putin’s presidency, Russia created an authoritarian dominant party regime. In such a system, patronage and coercion are used to ensure the dominant party’s control of elective offices. In Russia, United Russia’s commanding majority in parliament ensures that the president and government can enact their legislative agenda without opposition. The arrangement allows parliamentarians to enjoy substantial material benefits and patronage opportunities as champions of powerful commercial interests in return for conceding authoritarian powers to the president.

Zusammenfassung

Im Ergebnis der Parlaments- und Präsidentschaftswahlen 2007–2008 wird Russland zwar von einem neuen Präsidenten regiert, die spezifischen Beziehungsmuster zwischen Exekutive und Legislative, die unter Vladimir Putin etabliert wurden, bleiben jedoch erhalten. Während Putins Präsidentschaft wurde ein autoritäres, dominantes Parteiensystem geschaffen, in dem Patronage und Zwang die Kontrolle der dominanten Partei über Wahlämter gewährleisten. Die Mehrheit von „Einiges Russland“ in der Duma stellt sicher, dass Präsident und Regierung ihre legislative Agenda ohne nennenswerte Opposition verwirklichen können. Diese Konstellation eröffnet den Abgeordneten die Möglichkeit, materielle Gewinne zu realisieren und Patronagemöglichkeiten zu nutzen. Abgeordnete setzen ihre machtvollen kommerziellen Interessen durch und billigen dem Präsidenten im Gegenzug eine autoritäre Herrschaft zu. Die Hintergründe und Folgen der Wahlen werden in diesem Beitrag kommentiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, Heidi, 2008: Russia: The World’s Richest Government, http://www.forbes.com/2008/03/28/russia-billionaires-duma-biz-cz_hb_0401russiapols_print.html; 02.04.2008.

  • Chaisty, Paul, 2005a: Party Cohesion and Policy-Making in Russia, in: Party Politics 11, 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaisty, Paul, 2005b: Majority Control and Executive Dominance: Parliament-President Relations in Putin’s Russia, in: Pravda, Alex (Hrsg.), Leading Russia: Putin in Perspective. Essays in Honour of Archie Brown Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press, 119–138.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coalson, Robert, 2008: How the Kremlin Manages to Get the Right Results, in: RFE/RL Newsline, v. 12, no. 46, March 7, 2008.

  • Dahl, Robert A., 1971: Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gel’man, Vladimir, 2006a: From “Feckless Pluralism” to “Dominant Power Politics”? The Transformation of Russia’s Party System, in: Democratization 13, 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gel’man, Vladimir, 2006b: Perspektivy dominiruiushchie partii v Rossii, in: Pro et Contra July–August, 62–71.

  • Grigor, Gleb, 2002: Voiny interesov v Gosdume, in: Vedomosti, March 11, 2002.

  • Hale, Henry E., 2005: Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia, in: World Politics 58, 133–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova, Elena, 2008: Vziatki otkatilis’, in: Vedomosti (vedomosti.ru), February 6, 2008.

  • Kitschelt, Herbert/ Wilkinson, Steven I. (Hrsg.), 2007: Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven/ Way, Lucan A., 2002: Elections without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism, in: Journal of Democracy 13, 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magaloni, Beatriz, 2006: Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMann, Kelly M., 2006: Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F., 2001a: The Russian Parliament: Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime, 1989–1999. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F., 2001b: Putin and the Duma, in: Post-Soviet Affairs 17, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F., 2003a: Majorities without Mandates: The Federation Council since 2000, in: Europe-Asia Studies 55, 667–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F., 2003b: Coalition Politics in the New Duma, in: Hesli, Vicki L./ Reisinger William M. (Hrsg.), The 1999–2000 Elections in Russia: Their Impact and Legacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 232–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F., 2006a: Presidential Support in the Russian State Duma, in: Legislative Studies Quarterly 31, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F., 2006b: Democratization, Separation of Powers, and State Capacity, in: Colton, Timothy J./ Holmes, Stephen (Hrsg.), The State after Communism: Governance in the New Russia. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 261–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, Ora John/ Remington, Thomas F., forthcoming: Dominant Party Regimes and the Commitment Problem: The Case of United Russia, in: Comparative Political Studies.

  • Ross, Michael L., 1999: The Political Economy of the Resource Curse, in: World Politics 51, 297–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, Richard, 2004: Putin: Russia’s Choice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Benjamin, 2005: Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule, in: World Politics 57, 421–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobyanin, Alexander/ Novosil’tseva Mariia, 2004: Universal’naia mashina: lobbistskie vozmozhnosti novogo sostava Dumy, in: Sliianiia i pogloshcheniia, 36–40.

  • Tolstykh, Pavel A., 2007: GR: Praktikum po lobbizmu v Rossii. Moscow: Al’pina Biznes Buks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Benjamin, 2005: Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party Rule, in: World Politics 57, 421–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, Jeffrey, 1997: Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico, in: Mainwaring, Scott/ Shugart, Matthew S. (Hrsg.), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 225–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas F. Remington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Remington, T.F. Patronage and Power: Russia’s Dominant Party Regime. PVS 49, 213–228 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-008-0097-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-008-0097-y

Keywords

Schlagwörter

Navigation