Abstract
In initial teacher education, it is a challenge to foster the development of teaching skills proximal to classroom action. In this study, the impact of a combined practical and theoretical university-based term on preservice teachers’ professional vision is investigated by a video-based approach to supervising their knowledge acquisition and assessing their learning outcomes. Participants were N = 109 preservice teachers attending a 5-month theory practice term guided through video-based courses about effective teaching and learning. We measured their changes in professional vision using the video-based tool Observer. Our results show that preservice teachers positively change their professional vision during the theory practice term, especially if they show low entry levels at the beginning. Their notes on the observed teaching lessons illustrate these changes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acheson, K. A., & Zigler, C. J. (1971). A comparison of two teacher training programs in higher cognitive questioning. San Francisco.
Allen, D. W., & Clark, R. J. (1967). Microteaching. Its rational. The High school Journal, 51, 75–79.
Bauer, J., Diercks, U., Rösler, L., Möller, J., & Prenzel, M. (2012). Lehramtsstudium in Deutschland: Wie groß ist die strukturelle Vielfalt? Unterrichtswissenschaft, 40, 101–120.
Beck, R. J., King, A., & Marshall, S. K. (2002). Effects of videocase construction on pre-service teachers’ observation of teaching. The Journal of Experimental Education, 70(04), 345–361.
Berliner, D. C., Stein, P., Sabers, D. S., Clarridge, P. B., Cushing, K. S., & Pinnegar, S. (1988). Implication of research on pedagogical expertise and experience in mathematics teaching. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 67–95). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189×033008003.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436.
Bromme, R. (1987). Teachers’ assessment of students’ difficulties and progress in understanding the classroom. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 125–146). London: Cassell.
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Brouwer, N. (2010). Determining long term effects of teacher education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 7 (7), pp. 503–510). Oxford: Elsevier.
Brouwer, N., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can teacher education make a difference? Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
Carter, K., Sabers, D., Cushing, K., Pinnegar, P., & Berliner, D. C. (1987). Processing and using information about students: A study of expert, novice and postulant teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 147–157.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Assessing assessment in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(3), 187–191.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120–138. doi:10.1177/0022487105283796.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47. doi:10.1177/0022487109348024.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. D. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Franscisco: Jossey-Bass.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond, & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189×08331140.
Drechsel, B. (2001). Subjektive Lernbegriffe und Interesse am Thema Lernen bei angehenden Lehrpersonen. Münster: Waxmann.
Goldman, R. (2007). Video research in the learning sciences. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Gomez, L. M., Sherin, M. G., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L.-E. (2008). Creating social relationships: The role of technology in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 117–131. doi:10.1177/0022487107314001.
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
Gröschner, A., & Schmitt, C. (2012). Kompetenzentwicklung im Praktikum? Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Erfassung von Kompetenzen und Ergebnisse einer Befragung von Lehramtsstudierenden im betreuten Blockpraktikum. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 5(2), 112–128.
Gröschner, A., Schmitt, C., & Seidel, T. (2013). Veränderung subjektiver Kompetenzeinschätzungen von Lehramtsstudierenden im Praxissemester. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 27(1). doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000090.
Grossman, P. (2005). Research on pedagogical approaches in teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 425–476). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
Gruber, H. (2001). Acquisition of expertise. In J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 5145–5150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Kee, A. N. (2012). Feelings of preparedness among alternativley certified teachers: what is the role of program features? Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 23–38. doi:10.1177/0022487111421933.
Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 89–101. doi:10.1080/02602930301684.
Kennedy, A. M., Ahn, S., & Choi, J. (2008). The value added by teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (Vol. 3, pp. 1249–1273). New York: Routledge.
Kersting, N. (2008). Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 845–861. doi:10.1177/0013164407313369.
Kersting, N., Givvin, K. B., Sotelo, F. L., & Stigler, J. W. (2010). Teachers’ analyses of classroom video predict student learning of mathematics: Further explorations of a novel measure of teacher knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 172–181. doi:10.1177/0022487109347875.
Kocher, M., Wyss, C., Baer, M., & Edelmann, D. (2010). Unterrichten lernen: den Erwerb von Unterrichtskompetenzen angehender Lehrpersonen videobasiert nachzeichnen. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 3(1), 23–55.
Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 157–176.
Krammer, K., Ratzka, N., Klieme, E., Lipowsky, F., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2006). Learning with classroom videos: Conception and first results of an online teacher-training program. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Mathematik, 38(5), 422–432.
Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Moreno, R., & Ortegano-Layne, T. (2008). Using cases as thinking tools in teacher education. The role of presentation format. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 449–465.
Müller, K. (2010). Das Praxisjahr in der Lehrerbildung-Empirische Befunde zur Wirksamkeit studienintegrierter Langzeitpraktika. Bd Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Noell, G. H., & Burns, J. L. (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation—An illustration of emerging technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 37–50.
Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, T. K., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13–25.
Palmeri, T. J., Wong, A. C. N., & Gauthier, I. (2004). Computational approaches to the development of perceptual expertise. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8(8), 378–386. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.001.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38–51. doi:10.1177/0022487108328485.
Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using Video to Teach Future Teachers to Learn from Teaching. ZDM The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133–145.
Schäfer, S., Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2012). Der Einsatz von Lerntagebücher in der universitären Lehrerausbildung – Welchen Effekt haben strukturierende Leitfragen zur Unterstützung auf die Reflexionsfähigkeit von Lehramtsstudierenden? In A. Rausch, K. Kögler, & A. -R. Laireiter (Eds.), Tagebuchverfahren zur prozessnahen Datenerhebung in Feldstudien – Gestaltungsparameter und Anwendungsempfehlungen (Vol. 26, pp. 271–291). Landau: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
Seago, N. (2004). Using video as an object of inquiry mathematics teaching and learning. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (Vol. 10, pp. 259–285). Amsterdam: Advances in Research on Teaching.
Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2007). Wie Lehrpersonen Unterricht wahrnehmen und einschätzen – Erfassung pädagogisch-psychologischer Kompetenzen bei Lehrpersonen mit Hilfe von Videosequenzen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft, 8, 201–218.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317.
Seidel, T., & Stürmer, K. (2013). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in pre-service teachers. Manuscript accepted for publication pending revision.
Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Stürmer, K. (2010a). „Observer“ – Validierung eines videobasierten Instruments zur Erfassung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Unterricht. In E. Klieme, D. Leutner, & M. Kenk (Eds.), Kompetenzmodellierung. Zwischenbilanz des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms und Perspektiven des Forschungsansatzes (Vol. Beiheft 56, pp. 296–306). Weinheim: Beltz.
Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., & Blomberg, G. (Producer). (2010b). Observer: video-based tool to diagnose teachers’ professional vision. Munich: Technische Universität München (TUM).
Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 34, 56–65, doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004.
Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Bexond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics. Mahwah: Earlbaum.
Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 119–150. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_1.
Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers’ professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383–395). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20–37.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers’ ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107–125. doi:10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7.
Stokking, K., Leenders, F., de Jong, J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2003). From student to teacher: reducing practice shock and early dropout in the teaching profession. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 329–350.
Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2012). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, in press. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02075.x.
van Es, E. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100–137.
van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.
van Es, E., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005.
Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 294–302. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.019.
Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field expereineces in college—and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1), 89–99. doi:10.1177/0022487109347671.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stürmer, K., Seidel, T. & Schäfer, S. Changes in professional vision in the context of practice. Gruppendyn Organisationsberat 44, 339–355 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-013-0216-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-013-0216-0