Skip to main content
Log in

Sex, Race, and Consideration of Bariatric Surgery Among Primary Care Patients with Moderate to Severe Obesity

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Capsule Commentary to this article was published on 19 October 2013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is one of few obesity treatments to produce substantial weight loss but only a small proportion of medically-eligible patients, especially men and racial minorities, undergo bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To describe primary care patients’ consideration of bariatric surgery, potential variation by sex and race, and factors that underlie any variation.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Telephone interview of 337 patients with a body mass index or BMI > 35 kg/m2 seen at four diverse primary care practices in Greater-Boston.

MEASUREMENTS

Patients’ consideration of bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Of 325 patients who had heard of bariatric surgery, 34 % had seriously considered surgery. Men were less likely than women and African Americans were less likely than Caucasian patients to have considered surgery after adjustment for sociodemographics and BMI. Comorbid conditions did not explain sex and racial differences but racial differences dissipated after adjustment for quality of life (QOL), which tended to be higher among African American than Caucasian patients. Physician recommendation of bariatric surgery was independently associated with serious consideration for surgery [OR 4.95 (95 % CI 2.81–8.70)], but did not explain variation in consideration of surgery across sex and race. However, if recommended by their doctor, men were as willing and African American and Hispanic patients were more willing to consider bariatric surgery than their respective counterparts after adjustment. Nevertheless, only 20 % of patients reported being recommended bariatric surgery by their doctor and African Americans and men were less likely to receive this recommendation; racial differences in being recommended surgery were also largely explained by differences in QOL. High perceived risk to bariatric surgery was the most commonly cited barrier; financial concerns were uncommonly cited.

LIMITATIONS

Single geographic region; examined consideration and not who eventually proceeded with bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSION

African Americans and men were less likely to have considered bariatric surgery and were less likely to have been recommended surgery by their doctors. Differences in how obesity affects QOL appear to account for some of these variations. High perceived risk rather than financial barrier was the major deterrent for patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Shekelle PG, et al. Pharmacological and surgical treatment of obesity. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2004;(103):1–6.

  2. Wee CC. A 52-year-old woman with obesity: review of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1097–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen NT, et al. Trends in use of bariatric surgery, 2003–2008. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(2):261–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flegal KM, et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012.

  5. Nguyen NT, et al. The relationship between hospital volume and outcome in bariatric surgery at academic medical centers. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):586–93. discussion 593-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1909–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sjostrom L, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O'Brien PE, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(8):1032–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Adams KF, et al. Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(8):763–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flum DR, et al. Early mortality among medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294(15):1903–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Flum DR, et al. Perioperative safety in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(5):445–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Suter M, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: significant long-term weight loss, improvement of obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life. Ann Surg. 2011;254(2):267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixon JB, et al. Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(3):316–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schauer PR, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adams TD, et al. Health benefits of gastric bypass surgery after 6 years. JAMA. 2012;308(11):1122–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas AM, et al. Perceptions of obesity: black and white differences. J Cult Divers. 2008;15(4):174–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevens J. Obesity and mortality in Africans-Americans. Nutr Rev. 2000;58(11):346–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wee CC, et al. Obesity, race, and risk for death or functional decline among medicare beneficiaries: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(10):645–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White MA, et al. Gender, race, and obesity-related quality of life at extreme levels of obesity. Obes Res. 2004;12(6):949–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Padgett J, Biro FM. Different shapes in different cultures: body dissatisfaction, overweight, and obesity in African-American and Caucasian females. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2003;16(6):349–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dorsey RR, Eberhardt MS, Ogden CL. Racial/ethnic differences in weight perception. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(4):790–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Steffen KJ, et al. Blood alcohol concentrations rise rapidly and dramatically after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013.

  23. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. 1998 Sep;6 Suppl 2:51S–209S.

  24. Kolotkin RL, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9(2):102–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen NT, et al. Use and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass at academic medical centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):248–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Williams GR. Health-related quality of life varies among obese subgroups. Obes Res. 2002;10(8):748–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Caldwell MB, Brownell KD, Wilfley DE. Relationship of weight, body dissatisfaction, and self-esteem in African American and white female dieters. Int J Eat Disord. 1997;22(2):127–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson WA, et al. Weight loss and health outcomes in African Americans and whites after gastric bypass surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15(6):1455–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. DeMaria EJ, Portenier D, Wolfe L. Obesity surgery mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(2):134–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The study was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01DK073302, PI Wee). Dr. Wee is also supported by a NIH Midcareer Mentorship Award (K24DK087932). The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Ms. Huskey has full access to the data and takes responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina C. Wee MD, MPH.

APPENDIX

APPENDIX

Figure 1.
figure 1

Recruitment of the primary care sample. (asterisk) The estimated probability of study eligibility is 29 % among those without documented height/weight in record and 63 % if documented. (dagger) Four participants were deemed ineligible after completing the interview leaving an analytical sample of 337. (double dagger) The calculated response rate accounts for probability of eligibility among those who declined based on whether they had a height and weight documented in the medical record.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wee, C.C., Huskey, K.W., Bolcic-Jankovic, D. et al. Sex, Race, and Consideration of Bariatric Surgery Among Primary Care Patients with Moderate to Severe Obesity. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 68–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2603-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2603-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation