Skip to main content
Log in

Obturator Canal Lymph Node Metastasis from Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Total Mesorectal Excision May Be Insufficient

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Optimal surgical treatment for small early rectal carcinoids is controversial. Large tumors (greater than 2 cm) and those with imaging evidence of lymph node metastasis are generally treated by low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME). We first observed and reported that midgut carcinoid with extensive mesenteric lymphadenopathy often develops alternated lymphatic drainage pathways. We hypothesize that rectal carcinoids have the same potential to develop alternated lymphatic pathways outside the mesorectal envelope, which allows tumor deposits to be missed by traditional TME.

Methods

Twenty-two consecutive rectal carcinoid surgical patient charts were reviewed to determine if alternated lymphatic drainage occurred and resulted in extra-mesorectal metastasis. We attempted to identify any risk factor(s) that may lead to developing such alternated lymphatic drainage pathways.

Results

Thirteen patients underwent initial LAR with TME (13/22, 59 %) and nine underwent a staged debulking for locoregional residual disease or regional/distant metastasis after previous resection (9/22, 41 %). Fourteen (14/22, 64 %) underwent radio-guided surgery in attempt to achieve a higher level of pelvic/distant metastatic disease detection and debulking. Six patients (6/22, 27 %) had obturator canal lymph node metastases confirmed histologically.

Conclusions

Based on our study, at least 27 % of rectal carcinoid patients may have extra-mesorectal metastasis that would be missed by the traditional TME. Radio-guided surgery can identify and remove such metastasis. The effect of having such extra-mesorectal metastasis and its surgical removal on long-term survival has yet to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, Evans DB. One Hundred Years After “Carcinoid”: Epidemiology of and Prognostic Factors for Neuroendocrine Tumors in 35,825 Cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3063–3072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Scherübl H. Rectal carcinoids are on the rise: early detection by screening endoscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41:162–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avenel P, McKendrick A, Silapaswan S, Kolachalam R, Kestenberg W, Ferguson L, Jacobs MJ, Goriel Y, Mittal V. Gastrointestinal carcinoids: an increasing incidence of rectal distribution. Am Surg 2010; 76:759–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang M, Peng J, Yang W, Chen W, Mo S, Cai S. Prognostic analysis for carcinoid tumours of recrectum: a single institutional analysis of 106 patients. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13:150–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramage JK, Goretzki PE, Manfredi R, Komminoth P, Ferone D, Hyrdel R, Kaltsas G, Kelestimur F, Kvols L, Scoazec JY, Sevilla Garcia MI, Caplin ME. Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with digestive neuroendocrine tumours: well-differentiated colon and rectum tumour/carcinoma. Neuroendocrinology 2008; 87:31–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony LB, Strosberg JR, Klimstra DS, Maple WJ, O’Dorisio TM, Warner RR, Wiseman GA, Benson AB, Pommier RF. The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (nets): well-differentiated nets of the distal colon and rectum. Pancreas 2010; 39:767–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Cancer Institute (2011). Treatment guidelines for health care professionals. Available:http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/gastrointestinalcarcinoid/Patient/page1/AllPages/Print.

  8. Kulke MH, Benson AB, Bergsland E, Berlin JD, Blaszkowsky LS, Choti MA, Clard OH, Doherty GM, Eason J, Emerson L, Engstrom PF, Goldner WS, Heslin MJ, Kandeel F, Kunz PM, Kuvshinoff BW, Moley JF, Pillarisetty VG, Saltz L, Schteingart DE. Neuroendocrine Tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012; 10:724–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I, Zikusoka MN, Shapiro MD. Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology 2005; 128:1717–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003; 97:934–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang YZ, Joseph S, Lindholm E, Lyons J, Boudreaux JP, Woltering EA. Lymphatic mapping helps to define resection margins for midgut carcinoids. Surgery 2009; 146:993–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang YZ, Diebold A, Woltering E, King H, Boudreaux JP, Anthony LB, Campeau R. Radioguided exploration facilitates surgical cytoreduction of neuroendocrine tumors. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:635–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Onogawa S, Tanaka S, Kitadai Y, Sumii M, Yoshihara M, Shimamoto F, Haruma K, Chayama K. Small rectal carcinoid with lymph node metastasis diagnosed prior to treatment. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 15:195–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Banzo J, Vidal-Sicat S, Prats E, Galofre G, Razola P, Mane S, Ubieto MA, Abos MD. In 111 DTPA octreotide scintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe detection in the diagnosis and treatment of residual lymph node metastases of a rectal carcinoid tumor. Clin Nucl Med 2005; 30:308–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fahy BN, Tang LH, Klimstra D, Wong WD, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Temple LK, Shia J, Weiser MR. Carcinoid of the rectum risk stratification (CaRRS): a strategy for preoperative outcome assessment. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14:396–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishiguro M, Miyoshi M, Kajiwara Y, Sato T, Shimazaki H, Hase K. Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg 2007; 245:80–7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato H, Maeda K, Maruta M, Masumori K, Koide Y. Who can get the beneficial effect from lateral lymph node dissection for Dukes C rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection? Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49:S3-12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang C, Zhou ZG, Yu YY, Li Y, Lei WZ, Cheng Z, Chen ZX. Patterns of lateral pelvic lymph node metastases and micrometastases for patients with lower rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33:463–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takahashi T, Ueno M, Azekura K, Ohta H. Lateral node dissection and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:S59-68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki K, Muto T, Sawada T. Prevention of local recurrence by extended lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer. Surg Today 1995; 25:795–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamaguchi T, Fujita S. A case of lateral pelvic lymph node recurrence of rectal carcinoid. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2008; 38:390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwaan MR, Goldberg JE, Bleday R. Rectal carcinoid tumors: review of results after endoscopic and surgical therapy. Arch Surg 2008; 143:471–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi-Zarn Wang.

Ethics declarations

Financial Support

None to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, YZ., Beyer, D.T. & Hall, M. Obturator Canal Lymph Node Metastasis from Rectal Carcinoid Tumors: Total Mesorectal Excision May Be Insufficient. J Gastrointest Surg 20, 1247–1252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3128-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3128-9

Keywords

Navigation