Skip to main content
Log in

Who Can Get the Beneficial Effect from Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Dukes C Rectal Carcinoma Below the Peritoneal Reflection?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Purpose

This study was designed to identify those patients with Dukes C rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection who might benefit from lateral lymph node dissection.

Methods

The study involved 104 consecutive Dukes C patients who received total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection between 1990 and 2002. The patients were retrospectively divided into three groups: patients without lateral spread (Group I: n = 52), patients with nodal involvement between the inferior hypogastric nerve and the internal iliac artery (Group II: n = 16), and patients with nodal involvement in the obturator space (Group III: n = 36). The patients also were divided into two groups according to the number of lateral nodes involved: less than four (n = 42) and at least four (lateral nodes involved: n = 10). Nodal involvement was determined histologically.

Results

The local recurrence and overall five-year survival rates were 5.8 and 66.9 percent in Group I, 18.8 and 59.8 percent in Group II, and 33.3 and 23.6 percent in Group III, respectively. These outcomes did not differ significantly between Groups I and II, but they were significantly worse in Group III than in Groups I and II, with the survival being significantly better in the patients with less than four histologically positive lateral nodes involved (43.2 percent) than in those with at least four positive lateral nodes involved (0 percent).

Conclusions

Lateral lymph node dissection was effective for Dukes C rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection with positive lateral nodes involved in the space between the autonomic nerve and the internal iliac artery and in patients with less than four positive lateral nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E Morikawa M Yasutomi K Shindou et al. (1994) ArticleTitleDistribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing method Dis Colon Rectum 37 219–223 Occurrence Handle8137667 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c7osFCluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02048158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. H Ueno C Yamauchi K Hase T Ichikura H Mochizuki (1999) ArticleTitleClinicopathological study of intrapelvic cancer spread to the iliac area in lower rectal adenocarcinoma by serial sectioning Br J Surg 86 1532–1537 Occurrence Handle10594501 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fmt1Chtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01271.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. T Takahashi M Ueno K Azekura H Ohta (2000) ArticleTitleLateral node dissection and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 43 IssueIDSuppl S59–S68 Occurrence Handle11052480 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crgtl2gsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02237228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. K Maeda M Maruta T Utsumi Y Hosoda Y Horibe (2002) ArticleTitleDose perifascial rectal excision (i.e., TME) when combined with the autonomic nerve-sparing technique interfere with operative radicality? Colorectal Dis 4 233–239 Occurrence Handle12780592 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00358.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. I Sauer HE Bacon (1951) ArticleTitleInfluence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicability of operation and prognosis Am J Surg 81 111–120 Occurrence Handle14799702 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaG3M%2FivFamsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(51)90196-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K Hojo T Sawada Y Moriya (1989) ArticleTitleAn analysis of survival and voiding, sexual function after wide iliopelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with carcinoma of the rectum, compared with conventional lymphadenectomy Dis Colon Rectum 32 128–133 Occurrence Handle2914526 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M7itVCmuw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y Moriya K Hojo T Sawada Y Koyama (1989) ArticleTitleSignificance of lateral node dissection for advanced rectal carcinoma at or below the peritoneal reflection Dis Colon Rectum 32 307–315 Occurrence Handle2784376 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL1M7ntVSmtQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. K Suzuki T Muto T Sawada (1995) ArticleTitlePrevention of local recurrence by extended lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer Surg Today 25 795–801 Occurrence Handle8555697 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK287gslOrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00311455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y Moriya K Sugihara T Akasu S Fujita (1995) ArticleTitlePatterns of recurrence after nerve-sparing surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma with special reference to loco-regional recurrence Dis Colon Rectum 38 1162–1168 Occurrence Handle7587758 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK28%2FmtVylug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02048331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y Moriya K Sugihara T Akasu S Fujita (1997) ArticleTitleImportance of extended lymphadenectomy with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer World J Surg 21 728–732 Occurrence Handle9276704 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2svit1Kmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002689900298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. K Maeda M Maruta T Utsumi H Sato K Toyama H Matsuoka (2003) ArticleTitleBladder and male sexual functions after autonomic nerve-sparing TME with or without lateral node dissection for rectal cancer Tech Coloproctol 7 29–33 Occurrence Handle12750952 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ivV2kug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/s101510300005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. K Hojo AM Vernava K Sugihara K Katumata (1991) ArticleTitlePreservation of urine voiding and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery Dis Colon Rectum 34 532–539 Occurrence Handle2055138 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3M3nsFKktw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02049890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y Moriya K Sugihara T Akasu S Fujita (1995) ArticleTitleNerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer Eur J Cancer 31 1229–1232 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0959-8049(95)00164-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K Sugihara Y Moriya T Akasu S Fujita (1996) ArticleTitlePelvic autonomic nerve preservation for patients with rectal carcinoma. Oncologic and functional outcome Cancer 78 1871–1880 Occurrence Handle8909305 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FmsFyhtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1871::AID-CNCR5>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. CP Maas Y Moriya WH Steup GM Kiebert WM Kranenbarg CJ Velde Particlevan de (1998) ArticleTitleRadical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome Br J Surg 85 92–97 Occurrence Handle9462393 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7itl2ntw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00530.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J Hida M Yasutomi K Fujimoto T Maruyama K Okuno K Shindo (1997) ArticleTitleDoes lateral lymph node dissection improve survival in rectal carcinoma? Examination of node metastases by the clearing method J Am Coll Surg 184 475–480 Occurrence Handle9145067 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ptVCisg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. H Ueno H Mochizuki Y Hashiguchi K Hase (2001) ArticleTitlePrognostic determinants of patients with lateral nodal involvement by rectal cancer Ann Surg 234 190–7 Occurrence Handle11505064 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvlslymsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200108000-00008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. WE Enker ML Heilweil RL Hertz et al. (1996) ArticleTitleEn bloc pelvic lymphadenectomy and sphincter preservation in the surgical management of rectal cancer Ann Surg 203 426–433 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-198604000-00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F Michelassi GE Block (1992) ArticleTitleMorbidity and mortality of wide pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 35 1143–1147 Occurrence Handle1473415 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7hsVWrsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02251965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. RE Glass JK Ritchie HR Thompson CV Mann (1985) ArticleTitleThe results of surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum by radical resection and extended abdominoiliac lymphadenectomy Br J Surg 72 599–601 Occurrence Handle4027529 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M3otFWmug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Y Koyama Y Moriya K Hojo (1984) ArticleTitleEffects of extended systematic lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum: significant improvement of survival rate and decrease of local recurrence Jpn J Clin Oncol 14 623–632 Occurrence Handle6520971 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M7gvVGqtg%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. LF Moreira A Hizuta H Iwagaki N Tanaka K Orita (1994) ArticleTitleLateral lymph node dissection for rectal carcinoma below the peritoneal reflection Br J Surg 81 293–296 Occurrence Handle8156366 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3gslOlsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MW Stearns SuffixJr MR Deddish (1959) ArticleTitleFive year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 2 169–172 Occurrence Handle13652786

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. H Aoyama M Maruta K Maeda et al. (2004) ArticleTitleChokuchougan rinpasetsuteni ni taisuru multi-slice CT shindan Medical 36 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  25. G Brown CJ Richards RG Newcombe et al. (1999) ArticleTitleRectal carcinoma: thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients Radiology 211 215–222 Occurrence Handle10189474 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gsFCksA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. C Kulinna J Scheidler T Strauss et al. (2004) ArticleTitleLocal staging of rectal cancer. Assessment with double-contrast multislice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound J Comput Assist Tomogr 28 123–130 Occurrence Handle14716245 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00004728-200401000-00021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. AG Maier PP Barton NR Neuhold F Herbst BK Teleky GL Lechner (1997) ArticleTitlePeritumoral tissue reaction at transrectal US as a possible cause of overstaging in rectal cancer: histopathologic correlation Radiology 203 785–789 Occurrence Handle9169705 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2szhtlWjsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Sato M.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, H., Maeda, K., Maruta, M. et al. Who Can Get the Beneficial Effect from Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Dukes C Rectal Carcinoma Below the Peritoneal Reflection?. Dis Colon Rectum 49 (Suppl 1), S3–S12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0699-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0699-7

Key words

Navigation