Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic Approach to Appendectomy Reduces the Incidence of Short- and Long-Term Post-operative Bowel Obstruction: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the effect of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) compared to open appendectomy (OA) on short-term and long-term post-operative bowel obstruction.

Methods

Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists were searched. Subset analysis was performed for paediatric patients, patients who presented with perforated appendicitis and studies with long-term follow-up and surveillance for bowel obstruction and with surgery for bowel obstruction.

Results

Overall, 29 studies comprising 159,729 patients (60,875 LA versus 98,854 OA) were included. LA was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of post-operative bowel obstruction in the general population (pooled odds ratio (POR) = 0.43 [95 %C.I. 0.3–0.63]). Subset analysis demonstrated that LA significantly reduced the incidence of post-operative bowel obstruction in paediatric patients (POR = 0.48 [95 %C.I. 0.3–0.78]) and patients with perforated appendicitis (POR = 0.44 [95 %C.I. 0.26–0.74]). Furthermore, LA was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of long-term bowel obstruction (POR = 0.33 [95 %C.I. 0.19–0.56]) and bowel obstruction requiring surgery (POR = 0.31 [95 %C.I. 0.2–0.48]).

Discussions

This present meta-analysis provides evidence to clearly demonstrate the benefits of a laparoscopic approach to appendectomy as reflected by a reduction in short- and long-term adhesive bowel obstruction. Important future areas for assessment include the influence of surgical approach on long-term quality of life following appendectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000; 215:337-348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, et al. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132:910-925.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flum DR, Morris A, Keopsell T, et al. Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 2001; 286:1748-1753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983;15:59-64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M. Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007; 17:245-255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:545-553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moberg AC, Montgomery A. Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997;7:459-463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010;CD001546.

  9. Swank HA, Eshius EJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Short- and long-term results of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg.2011;35:1221-1226; discussion 1227-1228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leung TT, Dixon E, Gill M, et al. Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence? Ann Surg. 2009;250:51-53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kouhia ST, Heiskanen JT, Huttunen R, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1395-1400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Angenete E, Jacobsson A, Gellerstedt M, et al. Effect of laparoscopy on the risk of small-bowel obstruction: a population-based register study. Arch Surg. 2012;147:359-365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaksson K, Montgomery A, Moberg AC, Andersson R, Tingstedt B. Long-term Follow-up for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction After Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2013; 259: 1173-1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Southgate E, Vousden N, Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Black S, Zaida A. Laparoscopic vs. Open appendectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 557 – 562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Markar SR, Blackburn S, Cobb R, Karthikesalingam A, Evans J, Kinross J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 1993 – 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Markar SR, Venkat-Raman V, Ho A, Karthikesalingam A, Kinross J, Evans J, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in obese patients. Int J Surg 2011; 9: 451 – 455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7:177 - 187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, Bedin N. The laparoscopic approach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed? A Single-center review of a 15-year experience. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1255 – 1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang HK, Han SJ, Choi SH, Oh JT. Feasibility of a laparoscopic approach for generalize peritonitis from perforated appendicitis in children. Yonsei Med J 2013; 54: 1478 – 1483

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duron JJ, Hay JM, Msika S, Gaschard D, Domergue J, Gainant A, Fingerhut A. Prevalence and mechanisms of small intestinal obstruction following laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective multicentre study. French Associated for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 2000; 135: 208 – 212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Esposito C, Borzi P, Valia JS, Mekki M, Nouri A, Becmeur F, Allal H, Settimi A, Shier F, Sabin MG, Mastroianni L. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a retrospective comparative study of 2,332 cases. World J Surg 2007; 31: 750 – 755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gasior AC, St Peter SD, Knott EM, Hall M, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL. National trends in approach and outcomes with appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 2264 – 2267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ikeda H, Ishimaru Y, Takayasu H, Okamura K, Kisaki Y, Fujino J. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39: 1680 – 1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jen HC, Shew SB. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: outcomes comparison based on a statewide analysis. J Surg Res 2010; 161: 13 – 17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kapischke M, Pries A, Caliebe A. Short term and long term results after open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy in childhood and adolescence: a subgroup analysis. BMC Pediatr 2013; 13: 154

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kapischke M, Friendrich F, Hedderich J, Schulz T, Caliebe A. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy – quality of life 7 years after surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2011; 396: 69 – 75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaselas C, Molinaro F, Lacreuse I, Becmeur F. Postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: 1581 – 1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li P, Xu Q, Ji Z, Gao Y, Zhang X, Duan Y, Guo Z, Zheng B, Guo X, Wu X. Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open appendectomy in children. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40: 1279 – 1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McKinlay R, Neeleman S, Klein R, Stevens K, Greenfield J, Ghory M, Cosentino C. Intraabdominal abscess following open and laparoscopic appendectomy in the pediatric population. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 730 – 733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meguerditchian AN, Prasil P, Cloutier R, Leclerc S, Peloquin J, Roy G. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: A favourable alternative in simple and complicated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 695 – 698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyano G, Okazaki T, Kato Y, Marusasa T, Takahashi T, Lane GJ, Yamataka A. Open versus laparoscopic treatment for pan-peritonitis secondary to perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 655 – 657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nadler EP, Reblock KK, Qureshi FG, Hackam DJ, Gaines BA, Kane TD. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children with perforated appendicitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006; 16: 159 – 163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nataraja RM, Teague WJ, Galea J, Moore L, Haddad MJ, Tsang T, Khurana S, Clarke SA. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47: 317 – 321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nwokoma NJ, Swindells MG, Pahl K, Mathur AB, Minocha A, Kulkami M, Tsang T. Pediatric advanced appendicitis: open versus laparoscopic approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009; 19: 110 – 113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Oka T, Kurkchubasche AG, Bussey JG, Wesselhoeft CW Jr, Tracy TF Jr, Luks FI. Open and laparoscopic appendectomy are equally safe and acceptable in children. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 242 – 245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rai R, Chui CH, Sai Prasad TR, Low Y, Yap TL, Jacobsen AS. Perforated appendicitis in children: benefits of early laparoscopic surgery. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007; 36: 277 – 280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shalak F, Almuhim SI, Ghantous S, Yazbeck S. Laparoscopic appendectomy: burden or benefit? A single-center experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009; 19: 427 – 429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shen Z, Ye Y, Yin M, Wang S. Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis versus chronic appendicitis. J Invest Surg 2012; 25: 209 – 213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tirabassi MV, Tashjian DB, Moriarty KP, Konefal SH Jr, Courtney RA, Sachs BF. Perforated appendicitis: is laparoscopy safe? JSLS 2004; 8: 147 – 149

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsao KJ, St Peter SD, Valusek PA, Keckler SJ, Sharp S, Holcomb GW 3rd, Snyder CL, Oslie DJ. Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42: 939 – 942

  41. Yagmurlu A, Vernon A, Barnhart DC, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1051 – 1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. York D, Smith A, von Allmen D, Phillips JD. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children after the learning curve. JSLS 2006; 10: 447 452

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Saba AA, Godziachvili V, Mavani AK, et al. Serum levels of interleukin 1 and tumour necrosis factor alpha correlate with peritoneal adhesion grades in humans after major abdominal surgery. Am Surg 1998;64:734-736.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tingstedt B, Isaksson J, Andersson R. Long-term follow up and cost analysis following surgery for small bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions. Br J Surg 2007;94:743-748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zbar RI, Crede WB, McKhann CF, et al. The postoperative incidence of small bowel obstruction following standard, open appendicectomy and cholecystectomy: a six year retrospective cohort study at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Conn Med 1993;57:123-127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Riber C, Soe K, Jorgensen T, et al. Intestinal obstruction after appendectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1125-1128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laparoscopic Surgery, Hinchingbrooke Healthcare Trust, Huntingdon, UK

    Sheraz R. Markar & Adrian Harris

  2. Department of General Surgery, Whittington Hospital, London, UK

    Marta Penna

  3. Department of Laparoscopic and Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Hinchingbrooke Healthcare NHS Trust, Huntingdon, UK

    Sheraz R. Markar

Authors
  1. Sheraz R. Markar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marta Penna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adrian Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheraz R. Markar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Markar, S.R., Penna, M. & Harris, A. Laparoscopic Approach to Appendectomy Reduces the Incidence of Short- and Long-Term Post-operative Bowel Obstruction: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 18, 1683–1692 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2572-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2572-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation