Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tumor Characteristics and Survival Analysis of Incidental Versus Suspected Gallbladder Carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Over half of all gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is discovered incidentally after cholecystectomy for benign disease. There are scant data comparing presentation and outcome for patients with incidental versus suspected GBC. The goal of this study is to determine the clinical differences between these two entities.

Study Design

Patients with GBC were identified retrospectively from records at academic healthcare institutions in Temuco, Chile; Atlanta, GA; and Rochester, MN between 1984 and 2008. Overall survival was compared for patients with and without preoperative suspicion using Kaplan–Meier curves and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of 571 patients, 128 (22.4 %) had preoperative suspicion of malignancy, and 443 (77.6 %) were discovered incidentally. Incidental tumors were of lower stage, better differentiated, and with lower rates of metastases. Median survival for incidentally discovered GBC was 32.3 versus 5.8 months for suspected GBC (p < 0.0001). In a Cox proportional hazards model controlling for operation extent, T stage, differentiation, and other factors, preoperative suspicion remains a strong risk factor (odds ratio, 2.0; confidence interval, 1.5–2.9; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Tumor characteristics differed significantly between patients with incidentally discovered versus preoperatively suspected GBC. Incidental GBC has a significantly better median survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oddsdottir M, P.T., Hunter JG (2009) Chapter 32. Gallbladder and the Extrahepatic Biliary System (Chapter), in Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery, A.D. Brunicardi FC, Billiar TR, Dunn DL, Hunter JG, Matthews JB, Pollock RE, Editor.

  2. Lohe F, M.G., Schauer C, Angele M, Jauch KW, Schauer RJ, The time of diagnosis impacts surgical management but not the outcome of patients with gallbladder carcinoma. European Journal of Medical Research, 2009. 14: p. 345–351.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frauenschuh D, G.R., Kraas E, How to proceed in patients with carcinoma detected after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 2000. 385: p. 495–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bazoua G, H.N., Lazim T, Do we need histology for a normal-looking gallbladder? Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, 2007. 14: p. 564–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldin RD, R.J., Gallbladder cancer: a morphological and molecular update. Histopathology, 2009. 55: p. 218–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yildirim E, C.O., Gulben K, Berberoglu U, The surgical management of incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Journal of Cancer Surgery, 2005. 31: p. 45–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayahara M, N.T., Nakagawara H, Kitagawa H, Ohta T, Prognostic factors for gallbladder cancer in Japan. Annals of Surgery, 2008. 248(5): p. 807–814.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlik, T.M., et al., Incidence of finding residual disease for incidental gallbladder carcinoma: implications for re-resection. J Gastrointest Surg, 2007. 11(11): p. 1478–86; discussion 1486–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapter 20. Gallbladder, in AJCC Cancer Staging Manual-7th Ed., T.A. Greene FL, Fritz AG, Compton CC, Byrd DR, Edge SB, Editor. 2010, American Joint Committee on Cancer: Chicago, IL.

  10. Chapter 15. Gallbladder., in AJCC Cancer Staging Manual - 6th Ed., P.D. Greene FL, Fleming ID, Fritz AG, Balch CM, Haller DG, Morrow M, Editor. 2002, American Joint Committee on Cancer: Chicago, IL.

  11. Kaplan EL, M.P., Nonparametric estimation for incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1958. 53: p. 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, D., Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1972. B34: p. 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braghetto I, B.J., Csendes A, Chiong H, Compan A, Valladeres H, Rojas J, Gallbladder carcinoma during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it associated with bad prognosis? International Surgery, 1999. 84(4): p. 344–349.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Antonakis P, A.N., Mylonaki D, Leandros E, M Konstadoulakis M, Zografos G, Androulakis G, Incidental finding of gallbladder carcinoma detected during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2003. 29(4): p. 358–360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Randi G, F.S., Vecchia CL, Gallbladder cancer worldwide: Geographical distribution and risk factors. International Journal of Cancer, 2005. 118: p. 1591–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan M. Sarmiento.

Additional information

Grant Support

This study was supported in part by a TL1 grant RR025010 from the Clinical and Translational Science Award Program, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazer, L.M., Losada, H.F., Chaudhry, R.M. et al. Tumor Characteristics and Survival Analysis of Incidental Versus Suspected Gallbladder Carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 16, 1311–1317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1901-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1901-y

Keywords

Navigation