Skip to main content
Log in

Tumor Relapse after Pancreatic Cancer Resection is Detected Earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer recurrence is often difficult to detect by conventional imaging. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the diagnosis of recurrent pancreatic cancer.

Methods

One-hundred thirty-eight patients were followed after resection for pancreatic cancer. Sixty-six underwent only CT and were excluded. Seventy-two patients also had FDG-PET. Recurrent patients were divided in two groups: group-1, CT positive and group 2, CT non diagnostic, FDG-PET positive. Characteristics and survival curves of the two groups were compared. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Overall, tumors recurred in 63 of 72 (87.5%) patients; two patients had a second cancer resected, thanks to FDG-PET. Tumor relapse was detected by CT in 35 patients and by FDG-PET in 61. Prognostic factors were similar in groups 1 and 2. Five out of 35 group 1 patients underwent surgery (two R0, two bypass, and one exploratory). Ten out of 28 group 2 patients underwent surgery (four R0, two R2, two bypass, and two exploratory). FDG-PET influenced treatment strategies in 32 of 72 patients (44.4%). Group 2 patients survived longer (P = 0.09), but the difference was not significant. Disease-free survival was similar in groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion

Tumor relapse is detected earlier by FDG-PET than by CT. FDG-PET can help select the best candidates for surgical exploration, although the real benefit is still to be defined. It influences treatment strategies in a significant percentage of patients. An earlier diagnosis did not influence survival due to the lack of effective therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY, Tomlinson JS, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS. Multimodality therapy for pancreatic cancer in the U.S.. Cancer 2007;110:1227–1234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrone CR, Brennan MF, Gonen M, Coit DG, Fong Y, Chung S, Tang L, Klimstra D, Allen PJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the actual 5-year survivors. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:701–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, Smyrk TC, Zhang L, Qin R, Gullerud RE, Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Is cure possible? Ann Surg 2008;247:456–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S. Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg 1997;21:195–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JK, Ha HK, Han DJ, Auh YH. CT analysis of postoperative tumor recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:384–391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T. The Role of paraaortic lymph node involvement on early recurrence and survival after macroscopic curative resection with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:345–352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JS, Yoon DS, Kim KS, Choi JS, Lee WJ, Chi HS, Kim BR. Factors influencing recurrence after curative resection for ampulla of Vater carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2007;95:286–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raut CP, Tseng JF, Sun CC, Wang H, Wolff RA, Crane CH, Hwang R, Vauthey JN, Abdalla EK, Lee JE, Pisters PWT, Evans DB. Impact of resection status on pattern of failure and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;246:52–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinsella TJ, Seo Y, Willis J, Stellato TA, Siegel CT, Harpp D, Willson JK, Gibbons J, Sanabria JR, Hardacre JM, Schulak JP. The impact of resection margin status and postoperative Ca19–9 levels on survival and pattern of recurrence after postoperative high-dose radiotherapy with 5-F-U-based concurrent chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 2008;31:446–453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van den broeck A, Sergeant G, Ectors N, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R, Topal B. Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:600–604. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2008.12.006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menke-Pluymers MB, Klinkenbijl JHG, Tjioe M, Jeekel J. Treatment of locoregional recurrence after intentional curative resection of pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1992;39:429–432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Westerdahl J, Andrén-Sandberg A, Ihse I. Recurrence of exocrine pancreatic cancer—local or hepatic? Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40:384–387.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sunamura M, Egawa S, Shibuya K, Shimamura H, Takeda K, Kobari M, Matsuno S. Therapeutic strategy for the recurrence of pancreatic cancer following pancreatectomy. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1999;100:200–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamm EP, Silverman PM, Charnsangavej C, Evans DB. Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of pancreatic cancer. AJR 2003;180:1311–1320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishigami K, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Tajima T, Asayama Y, Hirakawa M, Kakihara D, Shioyama Y, Nishihara Y, Yamaguchi K, Honda H. Significance of mesenteric lymphadenopathy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinomas: evaluation with serial MDCT studies. Eur J Radiol 2007;61:491–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkowski R, Thoma M, Bruns C, Dühmke E, Heinemann V. Combined chemoradiotherapy for isolated local recurrence after primary resection of pancreatic cancer. JOP 2006;7:34–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horiuchi H, Uchida S, Hisaka T, Ishikawa H, Sakai T, Kawahara R, Kinoshita H, Shirouzu K. A study of recurrent pancreatic cancer with metastatic liver tumors after pancreatectomy. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2005;32:1685–1687.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inoue K, Kosuge T, Shimada K, Yamamoto J, Takayama T, Ozaki H, Nose H. Repeated radical resection and intraoperative irradiation for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 1995;118:909–911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ibusuki M, Hiraoka T, Kanemitsu K, Takamori H, Tsuji T. Complete remission of pancreatic cancer after multiple resections of locally pancreatic recurrent sites and liver metastasis: report of a case. Surg Today 2008;38:563–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakano H, Asakura T, Koizumi S, Asano T, Watanabe T, Otsubo T, Takizawa K. Second surgery after a pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with periampullary malignancies. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:687–691.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleeff J, Reiser C, Hinz U, Bachmann J, Debus J, Jaeger D, Friess H, Büchler MW. Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2007;245:566–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rose DM, Delbeke D, Beauchamp D, Chapman WC, Sandler MP, Sharp KW, Richards WO, Wright JK, Frexes ME, Pinson CW, Leach SD. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of suspected pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998;229:729–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Franke C, Klapdor R, Meyerhoff K, Schauman M. 18-FDG positron emission tomography of the pancreas: diagnostic benefit in the follow-up of pancreatic carcinoma. Anticancer Res 1999;19:2437–2442.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jadvar H, Fischman AJ. Evaluation of pancreatic carcinoma with FDG PET. Abdom Imaging 2001;26:254–259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruf J, Lopez Hänninen E, Oettle H, Plotkin M, Pelzer U, Stroszczynski C, Felix R, Amthauer H. Detection of recurrent pancreatic cancer: comparison of FDG-PET with CT/MRI. Pancreatology 2005;5:266–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pedrazzoli S, Beger HG, Obertop H, Andrén-Sandberg A, Fernández-Cruz L, Henne-Bruns D, Lüttges J, Neoptolemos JP. A surgical and pathological based classification of resective treatment of pancreatic cancer. Summary of an international workshop on surgical procedures in pancreatic cancer. Dig Surg 1999;16:337–345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. UICC: TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sperti C, Bissoli S, Pasquali C, Frison L, Liessi G, Chierichetti F, Pedrazzoli S. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography enhances computed tomography diagnosis of malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2007;246:932–939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Chierichetti F, Ferronato A, Decet G, Pedrazzoli S. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting survival of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:953–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wakabayashi H, Nishiyama Y, Otani T, Sano T, Yachida S, Okano K, Izuishi K, Suzuki Y. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in surgery for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:64–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeong JH, Jung SH, Costantino JP. Nonparametric inference of median residual life function. Biometrics 2008;64:157–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Verslype C, Van Cutsem E, Dicato M, Cascinu S, Cunningham D, Diaz-Rubio E, Glimelius B, Haller D, Haustermans K, Heinemann V, Hoff P, Johnston PG, Kerr D, Labianca R, Louvet C, Minsky B, Moore M, Nordlinger B, Pedrazzoli S, Roth A, Rothenberg M, Rougier P, Schmoll HJ, Tabernero J, Tempero M, van de Velde C, Van Laethem JL, Zalcberg J. The management of pancreatic cancer. Current expert opinion and recommendations derived from the 8th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer, Barcelona, 2006. Ann Oncol 2007;18(S7):vii1–vii10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Israel O, Kuten A. Early detection of cancer recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT can make a difference in diagnosis and patient care. J Nucl Med 2007;48:28S–35S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sobhani I, Tiret E, Lebtahi R, Aparicio T, Itti E, Montravers F, Vaylet C, Rougier P, André T, Gornet JM, Cherqui D, Delbaldo C, Panis Y, Talbot JN, Meignan M, Le Guludec D. Early detection of recurrence by 18FDG-PET in the follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2008;98:875–880.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun L, Su XH, Guan YS, Pan WM, Luo ZM, Wei JH, Wu H. Clinical role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in post-operative follow-up of gastric cancer: initial results. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4627–4632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Casneuf V, Delrue L, Kelles A, Van Damme N, Van Huysse J, Berrevoet F, De Vos M, Duyck P, Peeters M. Is combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography superior to positron emission tomography or computed tomography alone for diagnosis, staging and restaging of pancreatic lesions? Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2007;70:331–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Liu D, Shields AF, Gareen IF, Hanna L, Stine SH, Coleman RE. Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone in expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Clin Oncology 2008;26:2155–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge Mario Gruppo for the statistical analysis, Tania Lazzarin for helping with the manuscript, and Simona Callegari for helping with data collection. This study was supported in part by grants from the Italian Ministry for the University, Scientific and Technological Research (MURST), project 2005060715_001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Pedrazzoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sperti, C., Pasquali, C., Bissoli, S. et al. Tumor Relapse after Pancreatic Cancer Resection is Detected Earlier by 18-FDG PET than by CT. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 131–140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1010-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1010-8

Keywords

Navigation