Outpatient Experience of Human Caring Scale (OEHC-Scale): Improvement by Delphi Method

Summary

Based on the outpatient interview and literature review, the initial framework of the outpatient experience of human caring scale was formed with 9 dimensions of outpatient process. The research aim was to improve the scale by Delphi method. Sixteen experts in medical management, human caring or medical education were invited to evaluate the importance of the dimensions and items of the scale and provided some expertise via filling out the Delphi consultation questionnaires twice in the consulting round. In the first round, the recovery rate showing the experts’ positivity was 80%; the coefficient of reliability (Cr) ascertaining the authority of the evaluation was 0.92; the mean and full mark ratios responding the concentration of the evaluation were 2.88–4.94 and 6.25%–93.75% respectively; the coefficients of variation (CV) and the Kendall’s W determining the concordance of the evaluation were 5.06%–52.15% and 0.21–0.24 respectively. In the second round, the recovery rate was 93.75%; the Cr was 0.93; the mean was 3.93–4.93; the full mark ratios were 26.67%–93.33%; the Kendall’s W was 0.14–0.31, the CV was 5.25%–23.61%. Via the two-round Delphi study, the scale that included 10 dimensions and 61 items has been improved. Ten dimensions are pre-hospital medical service, guidance, registration, waiting, diagnosis & treatment, paying, inspection & assay, medicine receiving, therapy/injection/transfusion and global evaluation. It was concluded that Chinese scholars have paid high attention to human caring and outpatient experience. The experts have given high agreements about the dimensions which were established with Chinese outpatient process. The dimensions are different from the similar researches about outpatient experience study. In the future, it is necessary to survey the outpatients to test the construct validity, internal consistency reliability and others of the scale to improve the scale.