Skip to main content
Log in

Microarray study of mechanism of trichostatin a inducing apoptosis of Molt-4 cells

  • Published:
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Histone deacetylase was overexpressed in a variety of cancers and was closely correlated with oncogenic factors. The histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA) was shown to induce apoptosis in many cancer cells. However, the mechanism of TSA on induction of cancer cells apoptosis is poorly understood. This study was designed to characterize the global gene expression profiles before and after treatment of human leukemia cell line Molt-4 with TSA. Flow cytometry, MTT and DNA ladder were used to observe the effect of TSA on the apoptosis of MOLT-4 cells and normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Microarray, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting were used to detect the difference of gene and protein expressions of Molt-4 cells after incubation of the cells with TSA. The results showed that TSA could induce Molt-4 apoptosis in dose- and time-dependent manners but spared PBMCs. Microarray analysis showed that after incubation with TSA for 9 h, 310 genes were upregulated and 313 genes were deregulated. These genes regulate the growth, differentiation and survival of cells. Among these genes, STAT5A was down-regulated by 80.4% and MYC was down-regulated by 77.3%. It was concluded that TSA has definite growth-inhibiting and apoptosis-inducing effects on Molt-4 cells in time- and dose-dependent manners, with weak cytotoxic effects on PBMCs at the same time. The mechanism of TSA selectively inducing apoptosis and inhibiting growth may be ascribed to the changes of pro-proliferation genes and anti-apoptosis genes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Minucci S, Pelicci PG. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and the promise of epigenetic (and more) treatments for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer, 2006,6(1):38–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. De los Santos M, Zambrano A, Aranda A. Combined effects of retinoic acid and histone deacetylase inhibitors on human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Mol Cancer Ther, 2007,6(4):1425–1432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vlasáková J, Nováková Z, Rossmeislová L, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress IFNalpha-induced up-regulation of promyelocytic leukemia protein. Blood, 2007,109(4):1373–1380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dalgard CL, Van Quill KR, O’Brien JM. Evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors for the therapy of retinoblastoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2008,14(10):3113–3123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Noh EJ, Lim DS, Jeong G, et al. An HDAC inhibitor, trichostatin A, induces a delay at G2/M transition, slippage of spindle checkpoint, and cell death in a transcription-dependent manner. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009,378(3):326–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen WK, Chen Y, Gu JX, et al. Effect of trichostatin A on histone acetylation level and apoptosis in HL-60 cells. J Exp Hematol, 2004,12(3):324–328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou J, Gao Q, Chen G, et al. Novel oncolytic adenovirus selectively targets tumor-associated polo-like kinase 1 and tumor cell viability. Clin Cancer Res, 2005,11(23): 8431–8440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyanaga A, Gemma A, Noro R, et al. Antitumor activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer cells: development of a molecular predictive model. Mol Cancer Ther, 2008,7(7):1923–1930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roy S, Shor AC, Bagui TK, et al. Histone deacetylase 5 represses the transcription of cyclin D3. J Cell Biochem, 2008,104(6):2143–2154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu H, Jove R. The STATs of cancer-new molecular targets come of age. Nat Rev Cancer, 2004,4(2):97–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ihle JN. STATs: signal transducers and activators of transcription. Cell, 1996,84:331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Darnell JE Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science, 1997, 277:1630–1635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rawlings JS, Rosler KM, Harrison DA. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway. J Cell Sci, 2004,117(Pt 8):1281–1283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Defilippi P, Rosso A, Dentelli P, et al. {beta} 1 Integrin and IL-3R coordinately regulate STAT5 activation and anchorage-dependent proliferation. J Cell Biol, 2005,168(7):1099–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastián C, Serra M, Yeramian A, et al. Deacetylase activity is required for STAT5-dependent GM-CSF functional activity in macrophages and differentiation to dendritic cells. J Immunol, 2008,180(9):5898–5906

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wierenga AT, Vellenga E, Schuringa JJ. Maximal STAT5-induced proliferation and self-renewal at intermediate STAT5 activity levels. Mol Cell Biol, 2008,28(21): 6668–6680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harir N, Boudot C, Friedbichler K, et al. Oncogenic kit controls neoplastic mast cell growth through a Stat5/PI3-kinase signaling cascade. Blood, 2008,112(6): 2463–2473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeoli A, Dentelli P, Rosso A, et al. Interleukin-3 promotes expansion of hemopoietic-derived CD45+ angiogenic cells and their arterial commitment via STAT5 activation. Blood, 2008,112(2):350–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hennighausen L, Robinson GW. Interpretation of cytokine signaling through the transcription factors STAT5A and STAT5B. Genes Dev, 2008,22(6):711–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosui A, Kimura A, Yamaji D, et al. Loss of STAT5 causes liver fibrosis and cancer development through increased TGF-ta and STAT3 activation. J Exp Med, 2009,206(4):819–831

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang X, Qiao D, Meyer K, et al. Signal transducers and activators of transcription mediate fibroblast growth factor-induced vascular endothelial morphogenesis. Cancer Res, 2009,69(4):1668–1677

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Freie BW, Eisenman RN. Ratcheting Myc. Cancer Cell, 2008,14(6):425–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Z, Boone D, Hann SR. Nucleophosmin interacts directly with c-Myc and controls c-Myc-induced hyperproliferation and transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008,105(48):18794–18799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Acosta JC, Ferrándiz N, Bretones G, et al. Myc inhibits p27-induced erythroid differentiation of leukemia cells by repressing erythroid master genes without reversing p27-mediated cell cycle arrest. Mol Cell Biol, 2008,28(24):7286–7295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu XL, Fang Y, Lee TC, et al. Retinoblastoma has properties of a cone precursor tumor and depends upon cone-specific MDM2 signaling. Cell, 2009,137(6): 1018–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ceballos E, Munoz-Alonso MJ, Berwanger B, et al. Inhibitory effect of c-Myc on p53-induced apoptosis in leukemia cells. Microarray analysis reveals defective induction of p53 target genes and upregulation of chaperone genes. Oncogene, 2005,24(28):4559–4571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This project was supported by a grant from the State Key Basic Research Program (No. 2002CB513100) and a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. C03020705).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, Z., Han, Z., Xiao, M. et al. Microarray study of mechanism of trichostatin a inducing apoptosis of Molt-4 cells. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. [Med. Sci.] 29, 445–450 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-009-0411-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-009-0411-y

Key words

Navigation