Skip to main content
Log in

Global minimization of difference of quadratic and convex functions over box or binary constraints

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present necessary as well as sufficient conditions for a given feasible point to be a global minimizer of the difference of quadratic and convex functions subject to bounds on the variables. We show that the necessary conditions become necessary and sufficient for global minimizers in the case of a weighted sum of squares minimization problems. We obtain sufficient conditions for global optimality by first constructing quadratic underestimators and then by characterizing global minimizers of the underestimators. We also derive global optimality conditions for the minimization of the difference of quadratic and convex functions over binary constraints. We discuss several numerical examples to illustrate the significance of the optimality conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akrotirianakis I.G. and Floudas C.A. (2004). A new class of improved convex underestimators for twice continuously differentiable constrained NLPs. J. Glob. Optim. 30: 367–390

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Akrotirianakis I.G. and Floudas C.A. (2004). Computational experience with a new class of convex underestimators: box constrained NLP problems. J. Glob. Optim. 29: 249–264

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. An L. and Tao P.D. (2001). A continuous approach for globally solving linearly constrained quadratic zero-one programming problems. Optimization 50: 93–120

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Beck A. and Teboulle M. (2000). Global optimality conditions for quadratic optimization problems with binary constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 11: 179–188

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Tal A. and Nemirovski A. (2000). Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms and Engineering Applications. SIAM-MPS, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cela E. (1998). The Quadratic Assignment Problem: Theory and Algorithms. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahl G. (2000). A note on diagonally dominant matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 317: 217–224

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dür M., Horst R. and Locatelli M. (1998). Necessary and sufficient global optimality conditions for convex maximization revisited. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 217: 637–649

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Floudas C.A. and Pardalos P.M. (2000). Optimization in computational chemistry and molecular biology: Local and global approaches. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Floudas C.A. and Visweswaran V. (1995). Quadratic optimization. In: Horst, R. and Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Handbook of Global Optimization, pp 217–269. Kluwer, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiriart-Urruty J.B. (2001). Global optimality conditions in maximizing a convex quadratic function under convex quadratic constraints. J. Glob. Optim. 21: 445–455

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Huy N.Q., Jeyakumar V. and Lee G.M. (2006). Sufficient global optimality conditions for multi-extremal smooth minimization problems with bounds and linear matrix inequality constraints. ANZIAM J. 47: 439–450

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeyakumar, V., Wu, Z.Y.: Conditions for global optimality of quadratic minimization problems with LMI and bound constraints. Special Issue of the International Conference, SJOM2005, Singapore. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 149–160 (2007)

  14. Jeyakumar V., Rubinov A.M. and Wu Z.Y. (2006). Sufficient global optimality conditions for non-convex quadratic minimization problems with box constraints. J. Glob. Optim. 36: 471–481

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeyakumar, V., Rubinov, A.M., Wu, Z.Y.: Non-convex quadratic minimization problems with quadratic constraints: global optimality conditions. Math. Program. A (2006). 10.1007/s10107-006-0012-5

  16. Junger M., Martin A., Reinelt G. and Weismantel R. (1994). 0/1 optimization and a decomposition approach for the placement of electronic circuits. Math. Program. 63: 257–279

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Mangasarian O.L., Rosen J.B. and Thompson M.E. (2006). Nonconvex piecewise-quadratic underestimation for global optimization. J. Glob. Optim. 34: 475–488

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Marcia R.F., Mitchell J.C. and Rosen J.B. (2005). Iterative convex quadratic approximation for global optimization in protein docking. Comput. Optim. Appl. 32: 285–297

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Pardalos P.M. and Rodgers G.P. (1990). Computational aspects of quadratic zero-one programming. Computing 45: 131–144

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Pınar M.C. (2004). Sufficient global optimality conditions for bivalent quadratic optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 122: 433–440

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Q. Huy.

Additional information

The authors are grateful to the referees for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions which have contributed to the final preparation of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeyakumar, V., Huy, N.Q. Global minimization of difference of quadratic and convex functions over box or binary constraints. Optimization Letters 2, 223–238 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-007-0053-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-007-0053-6

Keywords

Navigation