Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of attachment regions of hip muscles in CT image using muscle attachment probabilistic atlas constructed from measurements in eight cadavers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient-specific musculoskeletal biomechanical simulation is useful in preoperative surgical planning and postoperative assessment in orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. A difficulty in application of the patient-specific musculoskeletal modeling comes from the fact that the muscle attachment regions are typically invisible in CT and MRI. Our purpose is to develop a method for estimating patient-specific muscle attachment regions from 3D medical images and to validate with cadaver experiments.

Methods

Eight fresh cadaver specimens of the lower extremity were used in the experiments. Before dissection, CT images of all the specimens were acquired and the bone regions in CT images were extracted using an automated segmentation method to reconstruct the bone shape models. During dissection, ten different muscle attachment regions were recorded with an optical motion tracker. Then, these regions obtained from eight cadavers were integrated on an average bone surface via non-rigid registration, and muscle attachment probabilistic atlases (PAs) were constructed. An average muscle attachment region derived from the PA was non-rigidly mapped to the patients bone surface to estimate the patient-specific muscle attachment region.

Results

Average Dice similarity coefficient between the true and estimated attachment areas computed by the proposed method was more than 10% higher than the one computed by a previous method in most cases and the average boundary distance error of the proposed method was 1.1 mm smaller than the previous method on average.

Conclusion

We conducted cadaver experiments to measure the attachment regions of the hip muscles and constructed PAs of the muscle attachment regions. The muscle attachment PA clarified the variations of the location of the muscle attachments and allowed us to estimate the patient-specific attachment area more accurately based on the patient bone shape derived from CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) Method for registration of 3-D shapes. In: Robotics-DL tentative, International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 586-606

  2. Blemker SS, Delp SL (2005) Three-dimensional representation of complex muscle architectures and geometries. Ann Biomed Eng 33(5):661–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Breteler MDK, Spoor CW, Van der Helm FC (1999) Measuring muscle and joint geometry parameters of a shoulder for modeling purposes. J Biomech 32(11):1191–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbone V, Fluit R, Pellikaan P, van der Krogt M, Janssen D, Damsgaard M, Verdonschot N (2015) TLEM 2.0? A comprehensive musculoskeletal geometry dataset for subject-specific modeling of lower extremity. J Biomech 48(5):734–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damsgaard M, Rasmussen J, Christensen ST, Surma E, De Zee M (2006) Analysis of musculoskeletal systems in the AnyBody Modeling System. Simul Model Pract Theory 14(8):1100–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Thelen DG (2007) OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans 54(11):1940–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Delp SL, Ringwelski DA, Carroll NC (1994) Transfer of the rectus femoris: effects of transfer site on moment arms about the knee and hip. J Biomech 27(10):1201–1211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dice LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3):297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Sonka M (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9):1323–1341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Horsman MK, Koopman H, Van der Helm F, Prose LP, Veeger H (2007) Morphological muscle and joint parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the lower extremity. Clin Biomech 22(2):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito Y, Matsushita I, Watanabe H, Kimura T (2012) Anatomic mapping of short external rotators shows the limit of their preservation during total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(6):1690–1695

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaptein B, Van der Helm F (2004) Estimating muscle attachment contours by transforming geometrical bone models. J Biomech 37(3):263–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Marra MA, Vanheule V, Fluit R, Koopman BH, Rasmussen J, Verdonschot N, Andersen MS (2015) A subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty. J biomech eng 137(2):020904

  14. Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J, Zilles K, Pike B (2001) A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356(1412):1293–1322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Otake Y, Yokota F, Takao M, Fukuda N, Sugano N, Sato, Y (2016) Analysis of muscle fiber structure using clinical CT: preliminary analysis using cadaveric images. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 16th annual meeting of the international society for computer assisted orthopaedic surgery, Osaka

  16. Park H, Bland PH, Meyer CR (2003) Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(4):483–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pellikaan P, van der Krogt M, Carbone V, Fluit R, Vigneron L, Van Deun J, Koopman H (2014) Evaluation of a morphing based method to estimate muscle attachment sites of the lower extremity. J Biomech 47(5):1144–1150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piazza SJ, Delp SL (2001) Three-dimensional dynamic simulation of total knee replacement motion during a step-up task. J Biomech Eng 123(6):599–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasmussen J, Damsgaard M, Christensen ST, Surma E (2002) Design optimization with respect to ergonomic properties. Struct Multidiscip Optim 24(2):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinbolt JA, Fox MD, Schwartz MH, Delp SL (2009) Predicting outcomes of rectus femoris transfer surgery. Gait Posture 30(1):100–105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ (1999) Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18(8):712–721

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Styner M, Lee J, Chin B, Chin M, Commowick O, Tran H, Warfield S (2008) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge II—MS lesion segmentation. Midas J 2008:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Papademetris X, Yaniv Z, Ibanez L, Cheng P, Golby AJ (2009) OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 5(4):423–434

  24. Ungi T, Lasso A, Fichtinger G (2016) Open-source platforms for navigated image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal 33:181–186

  25. Van der Helm FC, Veeger H, Pronk G, Van der Woude L, Rozendal R (1992) Geometry parameters for musculoskeletal modelling of the shoulder system. J Biomech 25(2):129–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yokota F, Okada T, Takao M, Sugano N, Tada Y, Tomiyama N, Sato Y (2013) Automated CT segmentation of diseased hip using hierarchical and conditional statistical shape models. Proceeding international conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI 2013), LNCS 8150, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 190–197

  27. Yokota F, Takaya M, Okada T, Takao M, Sato Y (2012) Automated muscle segmentation from 3D CT data of the hip using hierarchical multi-atlas method. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 12th annual meeting of the international society for computer assisted orthopaedic surgery, Seoul

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI 26108004, JST PRESTO 20407, AMED/ETH the strategic Japanese-Swiss cooperative research program, and R21EB020113-01 from National Institutes of Health. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Drs. Ryan Murphy, Stephen Belkoff, Demetries Boston (Johns Hopkins University) to the cadaver experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norio Fukuda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Osaka University Hospital (No. 15538) and Nara Institute of Science and Technology (No. 2016-I-20).

Informed consent

This article does not contain patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuda, N., Otake, Y., Takao, M. et al. Estimation of attachment regions of hip muscles in CT image using muscle attachment probabilistic atlas constructed from measurements in eight cadavers. Int J CARS 12, 733–742 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1519-8

Keywords

Navigation