Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT scan range estimation using multiple body parts detection: let PACS learn the CT image content

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to develop an efficient CT scan range estimation method that is based on the analysis of image data itself instead of metadata analysis. This makes it possible to quantitatively compare the scan range of two studies.

Methods

In our study, 3D stacks are first projected to 2D coronal images via a ray casting-like process. Trained 2D body part classifiers are then used to recognize different body parts in the projected image. The detected candidate regions go into a structure grouping process to eliminate false-positive detections. Finally, the scale and position of the patient relative to the projected figure are estimated based on the detected body parts via a structural voting. The start and end lines of the CT scan are projected to a standard human figure. The position readout is normalized so that the bottom of the feet represents 0.0, and the top of the head is 1.0.

Results

Classifiers for 18 body parts were trained using 184 CT scans. The final application was tested on 136 randomly selected heterogeneous CT scans. Ground truth was generated by asking two human observers to mark the start and end positions of each scan on the standard human figure. When compared with the human observers, the mean absolute error of the proposed method is 1.2 % (max: 3.5 %) and 1.6 % (max: 5.4 %) for the start and end positions, respectively.

Conclusion

We proposed a scan range estimation method using multiple body parts detection and relative structure position analysis. In our preliminary tests, the proposed method delivered promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang C, Ritter F, Smedby Ö (2010) Making the PACS workstation a browser of image processing software: a feasibility study using inter-process communication techniques. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(4):411–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seifert S, Kelm M, Moeller M, Mukherjee S, Cavallaro A, Huber M, Comaniciu D (2010) Semantic annotation of medical images. In: SPIE medical imaging, pp 762808–762808

  3. Wang C, Smedby O (2010) Integrating automatic and interactive methods for coronary artery segmentation: let the PACS workstation think ahead. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5(3):275–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sabuncu MR, Yeo BTT, Van Leemput K, Fischl B, Golland P (2010) A generative model for image segmentation based on label fusion. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29(10):1714–1729

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang C, Smedby Ö (2014) Automatic multi-organ segmentation in non-enhanced CT datasets using hierarchical shape priors. In: Proceedings of the 22th international conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), Stockholm

  6. Dalal N, Triggs B (2005) Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2005. CVPR 2005, vol 1, pp 886–893

  7. Viola P, Jones MJ (2004) Robust real-time face detection. Int J Comput Vis 57(2):137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abramson Y, Steux B, Ghorayeb H (2007) Yet even faster (YEF) real-time object detection. Int J Intell Syst Technol Appl 2(2):102–112

    Google Scholar 

  9. Felzenszwalb PF, Girshick RB, McAllester D, Ramanan D (2010) Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(9):1627–1645

  10. Felzenszwalb PF, Huttenlocher DP (2005) Pictorial structures for object recognition. Int J Comput Vis 61(1):55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dollár P, Tu Z, Perona P, Belongie S (2009) Integral channel features. In: BMVC, vol 2, p 5

  12. Criminisi A, Shotton J, Robertson D, Konukoglu E (2011) Regression forests for efficient anatomy detection and localization in CT studies. In: Medical computer vision. Recognition techniques and applications in medical imaging. Springer, pp 106–117

  13. Zheng Y, Barbu A, Georgescu B, Scheuering M, Comaniciu D (2008) Four-chamber heart modeling and automatic segmentation for 3-D cardiac CT volumes using marginal space learning and steerable features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27(11):1668–1681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng Y, Barbu A, Georgescu B, Scheuering M, Comaniciu D (2007) Fast automatic heart chamber segmentation from 3D CT data using marginal space learning and steerable features. In: IEEE 11th international conference on computer vision, 2007. ICCV 2007, pp 1–8

  15. Zhou XS, Peng Z, Zhan Y, Dewan M, Jian B, Krishnan A, Tao Y, Harder M, Grosskopf S, Feuerlein U (2010) Redundancy, redundancy, redundancy: the three keys to highly robust anatomical parsing in medical images. In: Proceedings of the international conference on multimedia information retrieval, New York, NY, USA, pp 175–184

Download references

Conflict of interest

Chunliang Wang and Claes Lundström are both employed by Sectra AB (a company working with PACS development), and the reported study is funded by the company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunliang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Lundström, C. CT scan range estimation using multiple body parts detection: let PACS learn the CT image content. Int J CARS 11, 317–325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1232-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1232-z

Keywords

Navigation