Abstract
Introduction
Varicocele is a relatively complex pathology that affects the pampiniform plexus of veins in the spermatic cord. Modern treatment involves both urological/surgical and interventional procedures. Our objective is to compare outcomes of conventional laparoscopic ligation (LL) and occluding balloon embolization (OBE) a percutaneous interventional procedure.
Materials and methods
We treated retrospectively a total of 98 patients, divided in two cohorts; arm A with 48 and arm B with 50 patients. Arm A patients underwent LL, while arm B ones were treated in interventional radiology suite, via OBE method. No comorbidities were reported, especially scrotal ones. Hence, all patients have been asked to respect 3 and 6 months’ follow-up, clinical examination and ultrasonography were performed. Age range of the entire sample: 15–45 years old, with average of 28 years. The study involved two European centers. We performed a comparative analysis (Fisher’s test) of intra-operative time, hospitalization and patient’s postoperative recovery time.
Results and limitations
Outcomes have been in line with the recent literature ones, allowing the occluding balloon embolization a small advantage for quicker operative average time, hospitalization needed and full recovery to normal activities for the patient. Main limitation was the unfeasibility of cost-effectiveness analysis due to national differences, limited sample and lack of complete semen analysis pre- and postoperative.
Conclusion
Both OBE and LL are safe and effective procedures in the treatment of varicocele, conceding OBE a slight advantage in terms of hospital stay and full recovery to normal activity of patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hamada A, Esteves SC, Agarwal A (2016) Varicocele and male infertility, vol 1. SpringerBriefs in reproductive biology. Springer, Berlin, p 1
Naughton CK, Nangia AK, Agarwal A (2001) Pathophysiology of varicoceles in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 7(5):473–481
Abdel-Meguid TA, Al-Sayyad A, Tayib A, Farsi HM (2011) Does varicocele repair improve male infertility? An evidence-based perspective from a randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol 59:455–461
Kantartzi PD, Goulis ChD, Goulis GD, Papadimas I (2007) Male infertility and varicocele: myths and reality. Hippokratia 11(3):99–104
Tu D, Glassberg KI (2010) Surgery illustrated—surgical atlas, laparoscopic varicocelectomy. BJU Int 106:1094–1104
Basile A, Failla G, La Vignera S et al (2014) Left spermatic vein retrograde sclerosis: comparison between sclerosant agent injection through a diagnostic catheter versus through an occluding balloon catheter. Radiol Med 120:483–488
Sarteschi LM, Menchini Fabris GM (2003) Ecografia andrologica. Athena audiovisuals, Modena
Bechara CF, Weakley SM, Kougias P et al (2009) Percutaneous treatment of varicocele with microcoil embolization: comparison of treatment outcome with laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Vascular 17(Suppl 3):S129–S136
Halpern J, Mittal S, Pereira K et al (2016) Percutaneous embolization of varicocele: technique, indications, relative contraindications, and complications. Asian J Androl 18:234–238
Grosso M, Balderi A, Antonietti A et al (2015) Endovascular sclerotherapy for male varicoceles: a retrospective analysis of 1619 patients. Austin J Surg 2(2):1051
Zanghí G, Di Stefano G, Furci M et al (2004) Surgical treatment of varicocele in day-surgery: our experience. G Chir 25(8–9):287–289
Wang J, Xia SJ, Liu ZH et al (2014) Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 17:74
Iaccarino V, Venetucci P (2012) Interventional radiology of male varicocele: current status. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 35:1263–12802
Kroese ACJ, de Lange NM, Collins J, Evers JLH (2012) Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:10
Pieri S, Agresti P, Fiocca G et al (2006) Phlebographic classification of anatomic variants in the right internal spermatic vein confluence. Radiol Med 111:551–561
Gioppo A, Melchiorre F, Azzeroni R et al (2014) Analysis of radiation dose in varicocele embolization using a last generation C-arm: which risk for hereditary line? https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2014/c-2178
Gazzera C, Rampado O, Savio L et al (2006) Radiological treatment of male varicocele: technical, clinical, seminal and dosimetric aspects. Radiol Med 111:551–561
Verstandig AG, Shamieh B, Shraibman V, Raveh D (2015) Radiation dose reduction in fluoroscopic procedures: left varicocele embolization as a model. Eur Radiol 25:1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3556-4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Motta, A., Caltabiano, G., Pizzarelli, M. et al. Varicocele, conventional laparoscopic ligation versus occluding balloon embolization. Radiol med 124, 438–443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0968-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-018-0968-2