Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advantages of a two-step procedure for school-based scoliosis screening

Vantaggi di una procedura “a due tappe” per lo screening scolastico della scoliosi

  • Musculoskeletal Radiology/Radiologia Muscolo-Scheletrica
  • Published:
La radiologia medica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To verify if a “two step” school-based scoliosis screening procedure could reduce childhood radiation exposure and, if so, to estimate the subsequent reduction in radiogenic cancer fatalities and in socio-economic burden.

Material and methods

Data from two different scoliosis screening programs (A and B) performed on a total of 8,995 children (age range 9–14) were examined. Children in program A (5,731 children) were screened using a “two-step” procedure in which school physicians performed the first clinical examination and uncertain cases were referred to an orthopaedist. The school physicians were previously instructed by orthopaedists in the recognition of a number of simple clinical signs. Children in program B (3,264 children) were screened using a “one-step” procedure in which the initial clinical examination was performed directly by an orthopedist. In both programs, suspected cases of scoliosis were then ascertained by the orthopaedist with Radiography. To evaluate the lifetime attributable risk of cancer mortality the guidelines of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 were followed. The economic cost of the performed X-ray examination was calculated assuming the current National Health Service’s reimbursement to hospitals of euro 35 per X-Ray exam. The statistic significance of the difference in these estimates between the two programs was assessed using the proportions z-test. The issues of the relative sensitivity and specificity of the two programs were also examined.

Results

In programs A and B, 86 (1.5 %) and 95 (2.91 %) X-ray examinations were performed respectively (z=4.452, p<0.001). Based on these observations, a screening of 10,000 children directly performed by orthopaedists would result in 291 X-ray exams (2.91 %). A screening of the same number of children using a two-step procedure would result in 150 X-ray exams (1.5 %), with a savings of euro 4,935 for the National Health Care System, a reduction of 0.283 Sv of collective dose, and an estimated 50% reduction in the number of radiogenic malignant tumours.

Conclusions

Using a two-step scoliosis screening procedure provides reasonable sensitivity and specificity while reducing costs and radiation exposure to children.

Riassunto

Obiettivo

Verificare se il ricorso ad un metodo di screening scolastico per la scoliosi “a due tappe” riduce l’esposizione a radiazioni ionizzanti e, se è così, determinare la conseguente riduzione del rischio di cancro radio-indotto e del costo economico.

Materiali e metodi

Abbiamo esaminato i dati relativi a due programmi di screening (A e B) attuati su 8995 ragazzi (range di età, 9–14 anni). I ragazzi del gruppo A (5731 ragazzi) sono stati sottoposti ad un programma “a due tappe”. I medici scolastici, dopo essere stati istruiti da ortopedici sulla semeiotica clinica elementare, hanno effettuato la prima valutazione clinica ed hanno inviato allo specialista tutti i casi dubbi. Per i ragazzi del gruppo B (3264 ragazzi) è stato utilizzato un programma “ad una sola tappa”, cioè, la valutazione clinica è stata effettuata direttamente dall’ortopedico. In entrambi i programmi, soltanto l’ortopedico ha richiesto gli esami radiografici. Per valutare il successivo rischio di mortalità per cancro, sono state seguite le linee guida della Pubblicazione 60 della Commissione Internazionale sulla Protezione Radiologica. Per calcolare il costo economico degli esami radiografici effettuati, ci si è basati sull’attuale rimborso del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale agli ospedali che è di 35 euro ad esame. La significatività statistica delle differenze tra i due programmi, è stato calcolata con lo z test per le proporzioni. Inoltre, è stata considerata la sensibilità e specificità dei due metodi.

Risultati

Nei programmi A e B sono stati eseguiti rispettivamente 86 (1,5%) e 95 (2,91%) esami radiografici (z=4,452, p<0,001). Sulla base di queste osservazioni, uno screening di 10000 bambini effettuato direttamente dall’ortopedico, comporterebbe 291 esami radiografici (2,91%). Lo screening di uno stesso numero di ragazzi, utilizzando il programma “a due tappe”, comporterebbe invece 150 esami radiografici con un risparmio di 4935 euro per il Sistema Sanitario Nazionale, una riduzione della dose collettiva di 0,283 Sv ed una riduzione stimata del 50% del numero di tumori maligni radio-indotti.

Conclusioni

Il ricorso al programma di screening “a due tappe” presenta una buona sensibilità e specificità, riduce i costi e, soprattutto, l’esposizione a radiazioni dei ragazzi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References/Bibliografia

  1. Zurita Ortega F, Moreno Lorenzo C, Ruiz Rodríguez L et al (2008) Screening of scoliosis in a school population of 8 to 12 years in the province of Granada (Spain). An Pediatr (Barc) 69:342–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapoor M, Laham SG, Sawyer JR (2008) Children at risk identified in an urban scoliosis school screening program: a new model. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:281–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yawn BP, Yawn RA, Hodge D et al (1999) A population-based study of school scoliosis screening. JAMA 282:1427–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohtsuka Y, Yamagata M, Arai S et al (1988) School screening for scoliosis by the Chiba University Medical School screening program. Results of 1.24 million students over an 8-year period. Spine 13:1251–1257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yawn BP, Yawn RA (2000) The estimated cost of school scoliosis screening. Spine 25:2387–2391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pruijs JE, van der Meer R, Hageman MA et al (1996) The benefits of school screening for scoliosis in the central part of The Netherlands. Eur Spine J 5:374–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kane WJ, Brown JC, Hensinger RN, Keller RB (1978) Scoliosis and school screening for spinal deformity. Am Fam Physician 17:123–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunnoe BA (1990) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Rev 19:35–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maruyama T, Kitagawa T, Takeshita K et al (2003) Conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: can it reduce the incidence of surgical treatment? Pediatr Rehabil 6:215–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rigo M, Reiter CH, Weiss HR (2003) Effect of conservative management on the prevalence of surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Rehabil 6:209–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cassella MC, Hall JE (1991) Current treatment approaches in the nonoperative and operative management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Phys Ther 71:897–909

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. ICRP (1991) Publication 60. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. BEIR (2006) Health risks from exposures to low levels of ionizing radiations: BEIR VII-Phase 2. National Academic Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. EPA (1994) Estimating radiogenic cancer risks: EPA Report 402-R-93-076. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  15. UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Report 2000 to the General Assembly. Volumes I and II. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen J, Jurik AG, Firgaard B, Egund L (2003) Optimization of scoliosis examinations in children Pediatr Radiol 33:752–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Greiner KA (2002) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: radiologic decision-making. Am Fam Physician 65:1817–1822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morgan WF (2003) Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposures to ionizing radiations. I. Radiation induced genomic instability and bystanders effects in vitro. Radiat Res 159:567–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan WF (2003) Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposures to ionizing radiations. II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystanders effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiat Res 159:581–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Coates PJ, Lorimore SA, Lindsay KJ, Wright EG (2003) Tissue-specific p53 responses to ionizing radiation and their genetic modification: the key to tissue-specific tumour susceptibility? J Pathol 201:377–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Little JB (2003) Genomic instability and bystander effects: a historical perspective. Oncogene 22:6978–6987

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Galli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leone, A., Aulisa, A., Perisano, C. et al. Advantages of a two-step procedure for school-based scoliosis screening. Radiol med 115, 238–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0429-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-009-0429-z

Keywords

Parole chiave

Navigation